Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2005 Nov;62(11):750–760. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.013102

Air samples versus biomarkers for epidemiology

Y Lin 1, L Kupper 1, S Rappaport 1
PMCID: PMC1740917  PMID: 16234400

Abstract

Background: It has been speculated on theoretical grounds that biomarkers are superior surrogates for chemical exposures to air samples in epidemiology studies.

Methods and Results: Biomarkers were classified according to their position in the exposure-disease continuum—that is, parent compound, reactive intermediate, stable metabolite, macromolecular adduct, or measure of cellular damage. Because airborne exposures and these different biomarkers are time series that vary within and between persons in a population, they are all prone to measurement error effects when used as surrogates for true chemical exposures. It was shown that the attenuation bias in the estimated slope characterising a log exposure-log disease relation should decrease as the within- to between-person variance ratio of a given set of air or biomarker measurements decreases. To gauge the magnitudes of these variance ratios, a database of 12 077 repeated observations was constructed from 127 datasets, including air and biological measurements from either occupational or environmental settings. The within- and between-person variance components (in log scale, after controlling for fixed effects of time) and the corresponding variance ratios for each set of air and biomarker measurements were estimated. It was shown that estimated variance ratios of biomarkers decreased in the order short term (residence time ⩽2 days) > intermediate term (2 days < residence time ⩽2 months) > long term biomarkers (residence time >2 months). Overall, biomarkers had smaller variance ratios than air measurements, particularly in environmental settings. This suggests that a typical biomarker would provide a less biasing surrogate for exposure than would a typical air measurement.

Conclusion: Epidemiologists are encouraged to consider the magnitudes of variance ratios, along with other factors related to practicality and cost, in choosing among candidate surrogate measures of exposure.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (313.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Angerer J., Bader M., Krämer A. Ambient and biochemical effect monitoring of workers exposed to ethylene oxide. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998 Feb;71(1):14–18. doi: 10.1007/s004200050244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartsch H. Studies on biomarkers in cancer etiology and prevention: a summary and challenge of 20 years of interdisciplinary research. Mutat Res. 2000 Apr;462(2-3):255–279. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5742(00)00008-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernacki E. J., Zygowicz E., Sunderman F. W., Jr Fluctuations of nickel concentrations in urine of electroplating workers. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1980 Jan-Feb;10(1):33–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Binková B., Lewtas J., Misková I., Lenícek J., Srám R. DNA adducts and personal air monitoring of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in an environmentally exposed population. Carcinogenesis. 1995 May;16(5):1037–1046. doi: 10.1093/carcin/16.5.1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brugnone F., Perbellini L., Faccini G. B., Pasini F., Bartolucci G. B., DeRosa E. Ethylene oxide exposure. Biological monitoring by analysis of alveolar air and blood. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1986;58(2):105–112. doi: 10.1007/BF00380761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cherrie J. W. The beginning of the science underpinning occupational hygiene. Ann Occup Hyg. 2003 Apr;47(3):179–185. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meg030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cochran W. G. The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. Biometrics. 1968 Jun;24(2):295–313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cope R. F., Pancamo B. P., Rinehart W. E., Ter Haar G. L. Personnel monitoring for tetraalkyl lead in the workplace. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1979 May;40(5):372–379. doi: 10.1080/15298667991429714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Droz P. O. Pharmacokinetic modeling as a tool for biological monitoring. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1993;65(1 Suppl):S53–S59. doi: 10.1007/BF00381308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Duell T., Lengfelder E., Fink R., Giesen R., Bauchinger M. Effect of activated oxygen species in human lymphocytes. Mutat Res. 1995 Jan;336(1):29–38. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(94)00041-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Egeghy P. P., Tornero-Velez R., Rappaport S. M. Environmental and biological monitoring of benzene during self-service automobile refueling. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Dec;108(12):1195–1202. doi: 10.1289/ehp.001081195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Egeghy Peter P., Nylander-French Leena, Gwin Kristin K., Hertz-Picciotto Irva, Rappaport Stephen M. Self-collected breath sampling for monitoring low-level benzene exposures among automobile mechanics. Ann Occup Hyg. 2002 Jul;46(5):489–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gammon M. D., Wolff M. S., Neugut A. I., Terry M. B., Papadopoulos K., Levin B., Wang Q., Santella R. M. Temporal variation in chlorinated hydrocarbons in healthy women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997 May;6(5):327–332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Granath F., Rohlén O., Göransson C., Hansson L., Magnusson A. L., Törnqvist M. Relationship between dose in vivo of ethylene oxide and exposure to ethene studied in exposed workers. Hum Exp Toxicol. 1996 Oct;15(10):826–833. doi: 10.1177/096032719601501006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hecht S. S., Ye M., Carmella S. G., Fredrickson A., Adgate J. L., Greaves I. A., Church T. R., Ryan A. D., Mongin S. J., Sexton K. Metabolites of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen in the urine of elementary school-aged children. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 Nov;10(11):1109–1116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoel D. G., Kaplan N. L., Anderson M. W. Implication of nonlinear kinetics on risk estimation in carcinogenesis. Science. 1983 Mar 4;219(4588):1032–1037. doi: 10.1126/science.6823565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Horvath E., Pongracz K., Rappaport S., Bodell W. J. 32P-post-labeling detection of DNA adducts in mononuclear cells of workers occupationally exposed to styrene. Carcinogenesis. 1994 Jul;15(7):1309–1315. doi: 10.1093/carcin/15.7.1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Klemans W., Vleminckx C., Schriewer L., Joris I., Lijsen N., Maes A., Ottogali M., Pays A., Planard C., Rigaux G. Cytogenetic biomonitoring of a population of children allegedly exposed to environmental pollutants. Phase 2: Results of a three-year longitudinal study. Mutat Res. 1995 Apr;342(3-4):147–156. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(95)90024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kromhout H., Symanski E., Rappaport S. M. A comprehensive evaluation of within- and between-worker components of occupational exposure to chemical agents. Ann Occup Hyg. 1993 Jun;37(3):253–270. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/37.3.253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liljelind I., Rappaport S., Eriksson K., Andersson J., Bergdahl I. A., Sunesson A-L, Järvholm B. Exposure assessment of monoterpenes and styrene: a comparison of air sampling and biomonitoring. Occup Environ Med. 2003 Aug;60(8):599–603. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.8.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lindstedt G., Gottberg I., Holmgren B., Jonsson T., Karlsson G. Individual mercury exposure of chloralkali workers and its relation to blood and urinary mercury levels. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1979 Mar;5(1):59–69. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Morinello E. J., Ham A. J., Ranasinghe A., Sangaiah R., Swenberg J. A. Simultaneous quantitation of N(2),3-ethenoguanine and 1,N(2)-ethenoguanine with an immunoaffinity/gas chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry assay. Chem Res Toxicol. 2001 Mar;14(3):327–334. doi: 10.1021/tx0002076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mutti A. Biological monitoring in occupational and environmental toxicology. Toxicol Lett. 1999 Sep 5;108(2-3):77–89. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(99)00076-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rappaport S. M. Assessment of long-term exposures to toxic substances in air. Ann Occup Hyg. 1991 Feb;35(1):61–121. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/35.1.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rappaport S. M. Biological considerations in assessing exposures to genotoxic and carcinogenic agents. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1993;65(1 Suppl):S29–S35. doi: 10.1007/BF00381304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rappaport S. M. Biological monitoring and standard setting in the USA: a critical appraisal. Toxicol Lett. 1995 May;77(1-3):171–182. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03288-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rappaport S. M. Smoothing of exposure variability at the receptor: implications for health standards. Ann Occup Hyg. 1985;29(2):201–214. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/29.2.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rappaport S. M., Symanski E., Yager J. W., Kupper L. L. The relationship between environmental monitoring and biological markers in exposure assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Apr;103 (Suppl 3):49–53. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rappaport S. M., Yeowell-O'Connell K., Bodell W., Yager J. W., Symanski E. An investigation of multiple biomarkers among workers exposed to styrene and styrene-7,8-oxide. Cancer Res. 1996 Dec 1;56(23):5410–5416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rappaport Stephen M., Kupper Lawrence L. Variability of environmental exposures to volatile organic compounds. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2004 Jan;14(1):92–107. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rappaport Stephen M., Waidyanatha Suramya, Qu Qingshan, Shore Roy, Jin Ximei, Cohen Beverly, Chen Lung-Chi, Melikian Assieh A., Li Guilan, Yin Songnian. Albumin adducts of benzene oxide and 1,4-benzoquinone as measures of human benzene metabolism. Cancer Res. 2002 Mar 1;62(5):1330–1337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rothman N., Stewart W. F., Schulte P. A. Incorporating biomarkers into cancer epidemiology: a matrix of biomarker and study design categories. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995 Jun;4(4):301–311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sabbioni Gabriele, Jones Christopher R. Biomonitoring of arylamines and nitroarenes. Biomarkers. 2002 Sep-Oct;7(5):347–421. doi: 10.1080/13547500210147253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Siwińska E., Mielzyńska D., Smolik E., Bubak A., Kwapuliński J. Evaluation of intra- and interindividual variation of urinary 1-hydroxypyrene, a biomarker of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Sci Total Environ. 1998 Jun 30;217(1-2):175–183. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00186-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sorsa M., Anderson D. Monitoring of occupational exposure to cytostatic anticancer agents. Mutat Res. 1996 Aug 17;355(1-2):253–261. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(96)00031-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stengel B., Watier L., Chouquet C., Cénée S., Philippon C., Hémon D. Influence of renal biomarker variability on the design and interpretation of occupational or environmental studies. Toxicol Lett. 1999 May 20;106(1):69–77. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(99)00020-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Symanski E., Kupper L. L., Kromhout H., Rappaport S. M. An investigation of systematic changes in occupational exposure. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1996 Aug;57(8):724–735. doi: 10.1080/15428119691014585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Symanski Elaine, Greeson Nicole M. H. Assessment of variability in biomonitoring data using a large database of biological measures of exposure. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va) 2002 Jul-Aug;63(4):390–401. doi: 10.1080/15428110208984727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tates A. D., Boogaard P. J., Darroudi F., Natarajan A. T., Caubo M. E., van Sittert N. J. Biological effect monitoring in industrial workers following incidental exposure to high concentrations of ethylene oxide. Mutat Res. 1995 Jun;329(1):63–77. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(95)00018-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Testa A., Ranaldi R., Carpineto L., Pacchierotti F., Tirindelli D., Fabiani L., Giuliani A. R., Urso M., Rossini A., Materazzo F. Cytogenetic biomonitoring of workers from laboratories of clinical analyses occupationally exposed to chemicals. Mutat Res. 2002 Sep 26;520(1-2):73–82. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(02)00169-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tielemans E., Kupper L. L., Kromhout H., Heederik D., Houba R. Individual-based and group-based occupational exposure assessment: some equations to evaluate different strategies. Ann Occup Hyg. 1998 Feb;42(2):115–119. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4878(97)00051-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tola S., Kilpiö J., Virtamo M., Haapa K. Urinary chromium as an indicator of the exposure of welders to chromium. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1977 Dec;3(4):192–202. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tornero-Velez R., Symanski E., Kromhout H., Yu R. C., Rappaport S. M. Compliance versus risk in assessing occupational exposures. Risk Anal. 1997 Jun;17(3):279–292. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00866.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tossavainen A., Nurminen M., Mutanen P., Tola S. Application of mathematical modelling for assessing the biological half-times of chromium and nickel in field studies. Br J Ind Med. 1980 Aug;37(3):285–291. doi: 10.1136/oem.37.3.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Vodicka P., Tvrdik T., Osterman-Golkar S., Vodicková L., Peterková K., Soucek P., Sarmanová J., Farmer P. B., Granath F., Lambert B. An evaluation of styrene genotoxicity using several biomarkers in a 3-year follow-up study of hand-lamination workers. Mutat Res. 1999 Sep 30;445(2):205–224. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(99)00127-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Web-only appendices]
oenvmed_62_11_750__index.html (993B, html)
oenvmed_62_11_750__1.pdf (1,020.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES