Skip to main content
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2005 Jul;62(7):473–477. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.015024

Appropriate use of personal protective equipment among healthcare workers in public sector hospitals and primary healthcare polyclinics during the SARS outbreak in Singapore

S Chia 1, D Koh 1, C Fones 1, F Qian 1, V Ng 1, B Tan 1, K Wong 1, W Chew 1, H Tang 1, W Ng 1, Z Muttakin 1, S Emmanuel 1, N Fong 1, G Koh 1, M Lim 1
PMCID: PMC1741057  PMID: 15961624

Abstract

Background: Singapore was affected by an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) from 25 February to 31 May 2003, with 238 probable cases and 33 deaths.

Aims: To study usage of personal protective equipment (PPE) among three groups of healthcare workers (HCWs: doctors, nurses, and administrative staff), to determine if the appropriate PPE were used by the different groups and to examine the factors that may determine inappropriate use.

Methods: A self-administered questionnaire survey of 14 554 HCWs in nine healthcare settings, which included tertiary care hospitals, community hospitals, and polyclinics, was carried out in May–July 2003. Only doctors, nurses, and clerical staff were selected for subsequent analysis.

Results: A total of 10 236 valid questionnaires were returned (70.3% response); 873 doctors, 4404 nurses, and 921 clerical staff were studied. A total of 32.5% of doctors, 48.7% of nurses, and 77.1% of the administrative staff agreed that paper and/or surgical masks were "useful in protecting from contracting SARS". Among this group, 23.6% of doctors and 42.3% of nurses reported working with SARS patients. The view that a paper and/or surgical mask was adequate protection against SARS was held by 33.3% of doctors and 55.9% of nurses working at the A&E unit, 30.5% of doctors and 49.4% of nurses from medical wards, and 27.5% of doctors and 37.1% of nurses from intensive care units. Factors which predicted for agreement that paper and/or surgical masks were protective against SARS, included HCW's job title, reported contact with SARS patients, area of work, and Impact Events Scale scores.

Conclusion: A variety of factors determine appropriate use of personal protective equipment by HCWs in the face of a major SARS outbreak.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (73.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abdullah Abu S. M., Tomlinson Brian, Cockram Clive S., Thomas G. Neil. Lessons from the severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak in Hong Kong. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Sep;9(9):1042–1045. doi: 10.3201/eid0909.030366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dwosh Hy A., Hong Harry H. L., Austgarden Douglas, Herman Stanley, Schabas Richard. Identification and containment of an outbreak of SARS in a community hospital. CMAJ. 2003 May 27;168(11):1415–1420. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fisher Dale A., Chew Madeleine H. L., Lim Yean-Teng, Tambyah Paul A. Preventing local transmission of SARS: lessons from Singapore. Med J Aust. 2003 Jun 2;178(11):555–558. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05358.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ho Alice S., Sung Joseph J. Y., Chan-Yeung Moira. An outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome among hospital workers in a community hospital in Hong Kong. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Oct 7;139(7):564–567. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-7-200310070-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Horowitz M., Wilner N., Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med. 1979 May;41(3):209–218. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hsu Li-Yang, Lee Cheng-Chuan, Green Justin A., Ang Brenda, Paton Nicholas I., Lee Lawrence, Villacian Jorge S., Lim Poh-Lian, Earnest Arul, Leo Yee-Sin. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Singapore: clinical features of index patient and initial contacts. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Jun;9(6):713–717. doi: 10.3201/eid0906.030264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Koh David, Lim Meng-Kin, Chia Sin-Eng. SARS: health care work can be hazardous to health. Occup Med (Lond) 2003 Jun;53(4):241–243. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqg090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Loeb Mark, McGeer Allison, Henry Bonnie, Ofner Marianna, Rose David, Hlywka Tammy, Levie Joanne, McQueen Jane, Smith Stephanie, Moss Lorraine. SARS among critical care nurses, Toronto. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Feb;10(2):251–255. doi: 10.3201/eid1002.030838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Low Donald E., McGeer Allison. SARS--one year later. N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 18;349(25):2381–2382. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp038203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Seto W. H., Tsang D., Yung R. W. H., Ching T. Y., Ng T. K., Ho M., Ho L. M., Peiris J. S. M., Advisors of Expert SARS group of Hospital Authority Effectiveness of precautions against droplets and contact in prevention of nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Lancet. 2003 May 3;361(9368):1519–1520. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13168-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sundin Eva C., Horowitz Mardi J. Impact of Event Scale: psychometric properties. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Mar;180:205–209. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.3.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES