Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2005 Sep;62(9):633–641. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.015396

An assessment of dermal exposure to semi-synthetic metal working fluids by different methods to group workers for an epidemiological study on dermatitis

de Joo B van Wendel 1, E Bierman 1, D Brouwer 1, J Spithoven 1, H Kromhout 1
PMCID: PMC1741081  PMID: 16109820

Abstract

Background: Assessment of exposure assessment to metal working fluids (MWF) has almost exclusively focused on inhalation exposure.

Aims: To assess levels of, and factors affecting, dermal and inhalation exposure to semi-synthetic MWF, and to identify suitable dermal exposure grouping schemes among metal workers for an epidemiological survey on dermatitis of hands, forearms, and head.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in four metal working machining departments of a truck manufacturing plant, estimating dermal and inhalation exposure levels to semi-synthetic metal working fluids (SMWF) in machine operators. Dermal exposure levels to SMWF were estimated by three different methods for dermal exposure assessment (VITAE, surrogate skin pad method, and a semi-quantitative dermal exposure assessment method (DREAM)).

Results: The identified factors affecting dermal exposure were similar for the three methods, although differences were found for estimated variability in dermal exposure levels between groups, within groups (among workers), and from day to day. With the VITAE method differences in exposure levels were detected between workers that were not detected with the surrogate skin pad method, and only partly with the DREAM method.

Conclusions: Considering the additional effort and costs that use of the VITAE method entailed, the observational semi-quantitative DREAM method appeared to be more efficient for grouping of dermal exposure levels for the epidemiological study on dermatitis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (130.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abrams L., Seixas N., Robins T., Burge H., Muilenberg M., Franzblau A. Characterization of metalworking fluid exposure indices for a study of acute respiratory effects. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2000 Jun;15(6):492–502. doi: 10.1080/104732200301287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bierman E. P., Brouwer D. H., Van Hemmen J. J. Implementation and evaluation of the fluorescent tracer technique in greenhouse exposure studies. Ann Occup Hyg. 1998 Oct;42(7):467–475. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4878(98)00059-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cherrie J. W., Brouwer D. H., Roff M., Vermeulen R., Kromhout H. Use of qualitative and quantitative fluorescence techniques to assess dermal exposure. Ann Occup Hyg. 2000 Oct;44(7):519–522. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eisen E. A., Bardin J., Gore R., Woskie S. R., Hallock M. F., Monson R. R. Exposure-response models based on extended follow-up of a cohort mortality study in the automobile industry. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001 Aug;27(4):240–249. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eisen E. A., Smith T. J., Kriebel D., Woskie S. R., Myers D. J., Kennedy S. M., Shalat S., Monson R. R. Respiratory health of automobile workers and exposures to metal-working fluid aerosols: lung spirometry. Am J Ind Med. 2001 May;39(5):443–453. doi: 10.1002/ajim.1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fenske R. A., Leffingwell J. T., Spear R. C. A video imaging technique for assessing dermal exposure. I. Instrument design and testing. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986 Dec;47(12):764–770. doi: 10.1080/15298668691390629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fenske R. A., Wong S. M., Leffingwell J. T., Spear R. C. A video imaging technique for assessing dermal exposure. II. Fluorescent tracer testing. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986 Dec;47(12):771–775. doi: 10.1080/15298668691390638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Greaves I. A., Eisen E. A., Smith T. J., Pothier L. J., Kriebel D., Woskie S. R., Kennedy S. M., Shalat S., Monson R. R. Respiratory health of automobile workers exposed to metal-working fluid aerosols: respiratory symptoms. Am J Ind Med. 1997 Nov;32(5):450–459. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199711)32:5<450::aid-ajim4>3.0.co;2-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hodgson M. J., Bracker A., Yang C., Storey E., Jarvis B. J., Milton D., Lummus Z., Bernstein D., Cole S. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis in a metal-working environment. Am J Ind Med. 2001 Jun;39(6):616–628. doi: 10.1002/ajim.1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kromhout H., Heederik D. Occupational epidemiology in the rubber industry: implications of exposure variability. Am J Ind Med. 1995 Feb;27(2):171–185. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700270203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kromhout H., Vermeulen R. Temporal, personal and spatial variability in dermal exposure. Ann Occup Hyg. 2001 Jun;45(4):257–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Brien D. M., Piacitelli G. M., Sieber W. K., Hughes R. T., Catalano J. D. An evaluation of short-term exposures to metalworking fluids in small machine shops. AIHAJ. 2001 May-Jun;62(3):342–348. doi: 10.1080/15298660108984636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Piacitelli G. M., Sieber W. K., O'Brien D. M., Hughes R. T., Glaser R. A., Catalano J. D. Metalworking fluid exposures in small machine shops: an overview. AIHAJ. 2001 May-Jun;62(3):356–370. doi: 10.1080/15298660108984638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Roff Martin, Bagon David A., Chambers Helen, Dilworth E. Martin, Warren Nicholas. Dermal exposure to electroplating fluids and metalworking fluids in the UK. Ann Occup Hyg. 2004 Apr;48(3):209–217. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meh029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Silverstein M., Park R., Marmor M., Maizlish N., Mirer F. Mortality among bearing plant workers exposed to metalworking fluids and abrasives. J Occup Med. 1988 Sep;30(9):706–714. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Simpson A. T., Groves J. A., Unwin J., Piney M. Mineral oil metal working fluids (MWFs)-development of practical criteria for mist sampling. Ann Occup Hyg. 2000 May;44(3):165–172. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4878(99)00085-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Soutar A., Semple S., Aitken R. J., Robertson A. Use of patches and whole body sampling for the assessment of dermal exposure. Ann Occup Hyg. 2000 Oct;44(7):511–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sprince N. L., Palmer J. A., Popendorf W., Thorne P. S., Selim M. I., Zwerling C., Miller E. R. Dermatitis among automobile production machine operators exposed to metal-working fluids. Am J Ind Med. 1996 Oct;30(4):421–429. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199610)30:4<421::AID-AJIM7>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sullivan P, Eisen E, Kreibel D, Woskie S, Wegman D. A nested case-control study of stomach cancer mortality among automobile machinists exposed to metalworking fluid. Ann Epidemiol. 2000 Oct 1;10(7):480–481. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00120-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Van-Wendel-de-Joode Berna, Brouwer Derk H., Vermeulen Roel, Van Hemmen Joop J., Heederik Dick, Kromhout Hans. DREAM: a method for semi-quantitative dermal exposure assessment. Ann Occup Hyg. 2003 Jan;47(1):71–87. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meg012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vermeulen Roel, Stewart Patricia, Kromhout Hans. Dermal exposure assessment in occupational epidemiologic research. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002 Dec;28(6):371–385. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wassenius O., Järvholm B., Engström T., Lillienberg L., Meding B. Variability in the skin exposure of machine operators exposed to cutting fluids. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998 Apr;24(2):125–129. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Woskie S. R., Virji M. A., Kriebel D., Sama S. R., Eberiel D., Milton D. K., Hammond S. K., Moure-Eraso R. Exposure assessment for a field investigation of the acute respiratory effects of metalworking fluids. I. Summary of findings. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1996 Dec;57(12):1154–1162. doi: 10.1080/15428119691014279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. de Boer E. M., van Ketel W. G., Bruynzeel D. P. Dermatoses in metal workers. (I). Irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1989 Mar;20(3):212–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1989.tb04658.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. de Boer E. M., van Ketel W. G., Bruynzeel D. P. Dermatoses in metal workers. (II). Allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1989 Apr;20(4):280–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1989.tb03146.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. van Wendel de Joode B., Vermeulen R., van Hemmen J. J., Fransman W., Kromhout H. Accuracy of a semiquantitative method for Dermal Exposure Assessment (DREAM). Occup Environ Med. 2005 Sep;62(9):623–632. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.018564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. van Wendel de Joode Berna, van Hemmen Joop J., Meijster Tim, Major Vicky, London Leslie, Kromhout Hans. Reliability of a semi-quantitative method for dermal exposure assessment (DREAM). J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2005 Jan;15(1):111–120. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES