Skip to main content
Postgraduate Medical Journal logoLink to Postgraduate Medical Journal
. 2000 Jun;76(896):337–339. doi: 10.1136/pmj.76.896.337

Permanent pacemaker insertion in a district general hospital: indications, patient characteristics, and complications

A Eltrafi 1, P Currie 1, J Silas 1
PMCID: PMC1741607  PMID: 10824046

Abstract

This report reviews the experience of permanent pacemaker insertion in a district general hospital (catchment population of 350 000) and makes a comparison with the national database and other hospitals in the UK.
METHODS—The records of all patients receiving a permanent pacemaker in the inclusive period January 1996 to December 1998 were reviewed. Data collected included number of patients paced each year, age, sex, indications, and complications.
RESULTS—In the three years reviewed 200 patients received new permanent pacemakers, a rate of 190 per million population per year, which is similar to the national implantation rate of permanent pacemakers but lower than that of most European countries (see discussion). The majority of patients paced were elderly (75% were above the age of 70 years).
 Atrioventricular block (including complete heart block, 45%, and Mobitz type 2 block, 12.5%) was the commonest indication for permanent pacemaker insertion, followed by sick sinus syndrome (25%) and these findings are comparable to those reported previously. However, carotid sinus syndrome was responsible for 16% of the patients paced and this was higher than that reported in the national database (6.5%). Only 1% of the pacemaker modes used was inappropriate and the complication rate was low at 3%.
CONCLUSIONS—This report confirms that permanent pacemaker insertion can be effectively and safely provided locally for the increasingly ageing population. The implantation rate both locally and nationally is still much lower than that of some countries in Europe.


Keywords: permanent pacemaker; atrioventricular block; sick sinus syndrome; carotid sinus syndrome

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (88.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alpert M. A., Curtis J. J., Sanfelippo J. F., Flaker G. C., Walls J. T., Mukerji V., Villarreal D., Katti S. K., Madigan N. P., Krol R. B. Comparative survival after permanent ventricular and dual chamber pacing for patients with chronic high degree atrioventricular block with and without preexistent congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Apr;7(4):925–932. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80358-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein A. D., Camm A. J., Fletcher R. D., Gold R. D., Rickards A. F., Smyth N. P., Spielman S. R., Sutton R. The NASPE/BPEG generic pacemaker code for antibradyarrhythmia and adaptive-rate pacing and antitachyarrhythmia devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1987 Jul;10(4 Pt 1):794–799. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1987.tb06035.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brignole M., Menozzi C., Lolli G., Oddone D., Gianfranchi L., Bertulla A. Validation of a method for choice of pacing mode in carotid sinus syndrome with or without sinus bradycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Feb;14(2 Pt 1):196–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb05090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dey A. B., Bexton R. S., Tyman M. M., Charles R. G., Kenny R. A. The impact of a dedicated "syncope and falls" clinic on pacing practice in northeastern England. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Mar;20(3 Pt 2):815–817. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb03910.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doherty J. G., Dawson F., Kerr F. Permanent pacemaker practice at a Scottish district general hospital between 1987 and 1993. Br Heart J. 1995 May;73(5):475–478. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.5.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Payne G. E., Skehan J. D. Issues in cardiac pacing: can agism be justified? Br Heart J. 1994 Aug;72(2):102–103. doi: 10.1136/hrt.72.2.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rasmussen K. Chronic sinus node disease: natural course and indications for pacing. Eur Heart J. 1981 Dec;2(6):455–459. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ray S. G., Connelly D. T., Hughes M., Bellamy C. M., Charles R. G. Stability of the DDD pacing mode in patients 80 years of age and older. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 Jul;17(7):1218–1221. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01488.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rickards A. F. Where's the block? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Mar 10;288(6419):737–738. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6419.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shaw D. B., Holman R. R., Gowers J. I. Survival in sinoatrial disorder (sick-sinus syndrome). Br Med J. 1980 Jan 19;280(6208):139–141. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6208.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Postgraduate Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES