Skip to main content
Postgraduate Medical Journal logoLink to Postgraduate Medical Journal
. 2000 Aug;76(898):496–499. doi: 10.1136/pmj.76.898.496

Management of spontaneous pneumothorax—a Welsh survey

J Yeoh 1, S Ansari 1, I Campbell 1
PMCID: PMC1741707  PMID: 10908379

Abstract

The authors sought to determine to what degree current practice by hospital physicians and accident and emergency (A&E) departments in Wales conformed to the British Thoracic Society's guidelines for the management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Questionnaires were posted to all consultants involved in emergency medical admissions in Wales (149 consultant physicians and 23 A&E consultants) of whom 101 (59%) replied. Only 45% used the classification, "small, moderate, or complete" to describe the size of pneumothorax. Just 44% would do as recommended by the British Thoracic Society and discharge an asymptomatic patient with a primary pneumothorax and 34% would discharge a patient with a primary pneumothorax after successful aspiration. Only 20% were prepared to try aspiration initially for a secondary pneumothorax with a complete lung collapse. Thirty four per cent would follow the recommendation to remove a chest drain without prior clamping of the tube 24 hours after bubbling had stopped. In the event of a persistent air leak 69% would refer patients or seek a specialist opinion. Physicians with an interest in respiratory medicine tolerated persistent air leaks for significantly longer than did non-respiratory physicians (median of 7 v 5 days, p=0.001). The survey indicates that fewer than expected consultant physicians and A&E consultants in Wales manage spontaneous pneumothoraces in the way recommended by the guidelines. Physicians with an interest in respiratory medicine tended to comply with these guidelines more than general physicians with interests other than respiratory medicine or A&E consultants but the trend was not significant at the 5% level. It is felt that the guidelines should be disseminated more widely, ensuring that emergency admissions units and A&E departments have copies on display or easily accessible, and that they could be expanded to cover other aspects such as timing for surgery.


Keywords: pneumothorax; non-compliance with guidelines

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (88.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrivet P., Djedaini K., Teboul J. L., Brochard L., Dreyfuss D. Spontaneous pneumothorax. Comparison of thoracic drainage vs immediate or delayed needle aspiration. Chest. 1995 Aug;108(2):335–339. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.2.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Archer G. J., Hamilton A. A., Upadhyay R., Finlay M., Grace P. M. Results of simple aspiration of pneumothoraces. Br J Dis Chest. 1985 Apr;79(2):177–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davis J. W., Mackersie R. C., Hoyt D. B., Garcia J. Randomized study of algorithms for discontinuing tube thoracostomy drainage. J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Nov;179(5):553–557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Harriss D. R., Graham T. R. Management of intercostal drains. Br J Hosp Med. 1991 Jun;45(6):383–386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harvey J., Prescott R. J. Simple aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for spontaneous pneumothorax in patients with normal lungs. British Thoracic Society Research Committee. BMJ. 1994 Nov 19;309(6965):1338–1339. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6965.1338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hyde J., Sykes T., Graham T. Reducing morbidity from chest drains. BMJ. 1997 Mar 29;314(7085):914–915. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7085.914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mathur R., Cullen J., Kinnear W. J., Johnston I. D. Time course of resolution of persistent air leak in spontaneous pneumothorax. Respir Med. 1995 Feb;89(2):129–132. doi: 10.1016/0954-6111(95)90195-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Melton L. J., 3rd, Hepper N. G., Offord K. P. Incidence of spontaneous pneumothorax in Olmsted County, Minnesota: 1950 to 1974. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979 Dec;120(6):1379–1382. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1979.120.6.1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Merget R., Dierkes A., Rueckmann A., Bergmann E. M., Schultze-Werninghaus G. Absence of relationship between degree of nonspecific and specific bronchial responsiveness in occupational asthma due to platinum salts. Eur Respir J. 1996 Feb;9(2):211–216. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09020211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miller A. C., Harvey J. E. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Standards of Care Committee, British Thoracic Society. BMJ. 1993 Jul 10;307(6896):114–116. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6896.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ormerod L. P., Bentley C. The management of pulmonary tuberculosis notified in England and Wales in 1993. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1997 Nov-Dec;31(6):662–665. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Raja O. G., Lalor A. J. Simple aspiration of spontaneous pneumothorax. Br J Dis Chest. 1981 Apr;75(2):207–208. doi: 10.1016/0007-0971(81)90055-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rhea J. T., DeLuca S. A., Greene R. E. Determining the size of pneumothorax in the upright patient. Radiology. 1982 Sep;144(4):733–736. doi: 10.1148/radiology.144.4.7111716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. So S. Y., Yu D. Y. Catheter drainage of spontaneous pneumothorax: suction or no suction, early or late removal? Thorax. 1982 Jan;37(1):46–48. doi: 10.1136/thx.37.1.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Postgraduate Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES