Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Postgraduate Medical Journal logoLink to Postgraduate Medical Journal
. 2001 Mar;77(905):181–184. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.905.181

Evaluation of local invasion by oesophageal carcinoma—a prospective study of prone computed tomography scanning

J Wayman 1, S Chakraverty 1, S Griffin 1, G Doyle 1, M Keir 1, W Simpson 1
PMCID: PMC1741949  PMID: 11222826

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the value of prone computed tomography compared with the traditional supine position, in the assessment of invasion of adjacent mediastinal structures by oesophageal cancer. A prospective, single blind case-case comparative study of signs of local tumour invasion was conducted. Sixty nine consecutive patients undergoing computed tomography for preoperative staging of oesophageal carcinoma were studied. Computed tomography scanning of the thorax was performed in the standard supine followed by prone position; in 39 patients the computed tomography findings were correlated with the surgical findings. Four established radiological signs used to assess mediastinal invasion were scored in each case.
Based on the radiological scoring system, there was a significant down staging in the probability of aortic invasion in 12 of the 69 cases (p<0.05). A similar improvement in accuracy was seen in the cases undergoing surgery; of the 38 cases who did not have aortic invasion at operation, 10 cases were scored as high for aortic invasion on the supine scans compared with only three on the prone position (p<0.05). Prone scanning was not of significant additional value in the assessment of major airway or pericardial invasion.
Modification of the computed tomography protocol to include scanning in the prone position will improve the accuracy of the preoperative staging of patients with oesophageal malignancy and reduce the chance of overstaging disease. Especially in centres where endoscopic ultrasound is not available, our modification may reduce the chance of denying patients potentially curative operations.


Keywords: computed tomography; neoplasm staging; oesophageal neoplasm; local invasion

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (134.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ball W. S., Wicks J. D., Mettler F. A., Jr Prone-supine change in organ position: CT demonstration. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980 Oct;135(4):815–820. doi: 10.2214/ajr.135.4.815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Doyle G. J., Simpson W. Technical report: prone scanning in the CT assessment of oesophageal carcinoma. Clin Radiol. 1994 Mar;49(3):209–210. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81779-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Griffin S. M., Robertson C. S. Non-surgical treatment of cancer of the oesophagus. Br J Surg. 1993 Apr;80(4):412–413. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mannell A., Becker P. J. Evaluation of the results of oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 1991 Jan;78(1):36–40. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Picus D., Balfe D. M., Koehler R. E., Roper C. L., Owen J. W. Computed tomography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma. Radiology. 1983 Feb;146(2):433–438. doi: 10.1148/radiology.146.2.6849089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rankin S. The role of computerized tomography in the staging of oesophageal cancer. Clin Radiol. 1990 Sep;42(3):152–153. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81921-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Skinner D. B., Little A. G., Ferguson M. K., Soriano A., Staszak V. M. Selection of operation for esophageal cancer based on staging. Ann Surg. 1986 Oct;204(4):391–401. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198610000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Takashima S., Takeuchi N., Shiozaki H., Kobayashi K., Morimoto S., Ikezoe J., Tomiyama N., Harada K., Shogen K., Kozuka T. Carcinoma of the esophagus: CT vs MR imaging in determining resectability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Feb;156(2):297–302. doi: 10.2214/ajr.156.2.1898802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tio T. L., Coene P. P., den Hartog Jager F. C., Tytgat G. N. Preoperative TNM classification of esophageal carcinoma by endosonography. Hepatogastroenterology. 1990 Aug;37(4):376–381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vilgrain V., Mompoint D., Palazzo L., Menu Y., Gayet B., Ollier P., Nahum H., Fekete F. Staging of esophageal carcinoma: comparison of results with endoscopic sonography and CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Aug;155(2):277–281. doi: 10.2214/ajr.155.2.2115251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Postgraduate Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES