Skip to main content
Postgraduate Medical Journal logoLink to Postgraduate Medical Journal
. 2001 Jun;77(908):395–398. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.908.395

Silent myocardial ischaemia in patients with proved coronary artery disease: a comparison of diabetic and non-diabetic patients

C Ditchburn 1, J Hall 1, M de Belder 1, A Davies 1, W Kelly 1, R Bilous 1
PMCID: PMC1742075  PMID: 11375455

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To determine whether diabetic patients with coronary artery disease are more likely to experience silent myocardial ischaemia than subjects without diabetes.
SUBJECTS—Patients undergoing coronary angiography at a regional cardiothoracic unit, identified as having diabetes from the local district diabetic register/database.
DESIGN—The coronary angiograms and exercise treadmill tests of 100 diabetic and 100 non-diabetic patients who all had significant coronary artery disease and maximal effort exercise tests were reviewed. Patients were individually matched for age group, gender, severity of coronary artery disease, and indication for treadmill test.
OUTCOME MEASURES—Significant coronary artery disease was defined as a stenosis of greater than 50% diameter in at least one of the major coronary artery segments. Exercise tests were graded as positive if the electrocardiographic (ECG) recording showed planar or downsloping ST segment depression of ⩾1 mm in more than two leads at 80 ms post J-point or if there was a blood pressure fall ⩾10 mm Hg after an initial rise. A negative exercise test was defined as one in which the subject experienced no pain, had no ECG changes after maximal effort and had a normal blood pressure response. Subjects who did not experience any form of typical angina-type pain during a positive exercise test were defined as having an episode of silent ischaemia. Patients with symptomatic ischaemia were those who experienced typical angina-type pain with accompanying ST segment changes. Patients with a negative exercise test were defined as having "undetermined ischaemia". This category included all those without ECG evidence of myocardial ischaemia during the exercise test (with or without accompanying chest pain).
RESULTS—In the diabetic patients, 34% had ECG evidence of silent ischaemia on treadmill testing compared with only 19% of the non-diabetic controls (p<0.02).
CONCLUSIONS—This study shows that diabetic patients with proved coronary artery disease have a higher risk of developing silent myocardial ischaemia during exercise than non-diabetic patients.


Keywords: coronary heart disease; ischaemia; diabetes; prevalence

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (103.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahluwalia G., Jain P., Chugh S. K., Wasir H. S., Kaul U. Silent myocardial ischemia in diabetics with normal autonomic function. Int J Cardiol. 1995 Feb;48(2):147–153. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(94)02233-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Koistinen M. J. Prevalence of asymptomatic myocardial ischaemia in diabetic subjects. BMJ. 1990 Jul 14;301(6743):92–95. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6743.92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mulcahy D., Keegan J., Crean P., Quyyumi A., Shapiro L., Wright C., Fox K. Silent myocardial ischaemia in chronic stable angina: a study of its frequency and characteristics in 150 patients. Br Heart J. 1988 Nov;60(5):417–423. doi: 10.1136/hrt.60.5.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Murray D. P., O'Brien T., Mulrooney R., O'Sullivan D. J. Autonomic dysfunction and silent myocardial ischaemia on exercise testing in diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 1990 Aug;7(7):580–584. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1990.tb01452.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nyman I., Larsson H., Wallentin L. Prevention of serious cardiac events by low-dose aspirin in patients with silent myocardial ischaemia. The Research Group on Instability in Coronary Artery Disease in Southeast Sweden. Lancet. 1992 Aug 29;340(8818):497–501. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91706-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Quyyumi A. A., Wright C. M., Mockus L. J., Fox K. M. How important is a history of chest pain in determining the degree of ischaemia in patients with angina pectoris? Br Heart J. 1985 Jul;54(1):22–26. doi: 10.1136/hrt.54.1.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rutter M. K., Marshall S. M., McComb J. M. Coronary artery disease and diabetes. Heart. 1997 Dec;78(6):527–528. doi: 10.1136/hrt.78.6.527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sayer J. W., Timmis A. D. Investigation of coronary artery disease in diabetes: is screening of asymptomatic patients necessary? Heart. 1997 Dec;78(6):525–526. doi: 10.1136/hrt.78.6.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sharma S. N., Bajaj R., Kaul U., Wasir H. S. Silent myocardial ischaemia in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. Indian Heart J. 1989 May-Jun;41(3):158–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. de Belder M., Skehan D., Pumphrey C., Khan B., Evans S., Rothman M., Mills P. Identification of a high risk subgroup of patients with silent ischaemia after myocardial infarction: a group for early therapeutic revascularisation? Br Heart J. 1990 Mar;63(3):145–150. doi: 10.1136/hrt.63.3.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Postgraduate Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES