Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Postgraduate Medical Journal logoLink to Postgraduate Medical Journal
. 2001 Aug;77(910):514–518. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.910.514

Consultations and referrals for dyspepsia in general practice—a one year database survey

M J J van Bommel 1, M Numans 1, N J de Wit 1, W Stalman 1
PMCID: PMC1742094  PMID: 11470932

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—Dyspepsia usually presents first in primary care. There are many reasons for referral including urgent problems (for example, haematemesis and melaena), treatment failure, or to exclude serious pathology. Referral will change the population characteristics of primary and secondary care dyspeptics. Many of the guidelines for primary care dyspepsia, however, are based on secondary care research on these referred patients. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of dyspepsia in general practice, the characteristics of patients presenting with dyspepsia in primary care, and the clinical and non-clinical determinants of referral in these patients.
DESIGN—Cross sectional survey of the consultation records of patients presenting with dyspepsia in primary care during a one year period.
METHODS—Dyspeptic patients who consulted their general practitioner (GP) in 1997 were selected on the basis of International Classification of Primary Care codes using a computer search among 20 sentinel practices affiliated with the Utrecht Network of General Practitioners. Cross tables and logistic regression analysis were carried out to reveal patient characteristics and determinants of referral.
RESULTS—The prevalence of dyspepsia presenting in primary care in 1997 was 3.4% (1740/48958). These patients were usually not referred during the first consultation. Men, elderly patients, and patients with a previous history of dyspepsia were referred to secondary care more frequently than other dyspeptic patients. Patients diagnosed with both irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia were at risk of being referred most.
CONCLUSION—Dyspepsia is a frequently occurring complaint in primary care and patients are usually treated by their GP. Besides clinically relevant reasons for referral, dyspeptic patients with irritable bowel syndrome seem to be more "at risk" of being referred to secondary care than other dyspeptic patients. The differences between primary and secondary care dyspeptic patients should be taken into account when interpreting research for guideline purposes. Further research is needed to clarify the background of the relation between irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia and its influence on referral.


Keywords: dyspepsia; irritable bowel syndrome; referral; general practice

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (128.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agréus L., Svärdsudd K., Nyrén O., Tibblin G. Irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia in the general population: overlap and lack of stability over time. Gastroenterology. 1995 Sep;109(3):671–680. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90373-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bytzer P. Diagnosing dyspepsia: any controversies left? Gastroenterology. 1996 Jan;110(1):302–306. doi: 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.agast960302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bytzer P., Hansen J. M., Havelund T., Malchow-Møller A., Schaffalitzky de Muckadell O. B. Predicting endoscopic diagnosis in the dyspeptic patient: the value of clinical judgement. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996 Apr;8(4):359–363. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199604000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colin-Jones D. G. Dyspepsia update. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1995;210:32–35. doi: 10.3109/00365529509090266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Evans P. R., Bak Y. T., Shuter B., Hoschl R., Kellow J. E. Gastroparesis and small bowel dysmotility in irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Oct;42(10):2087–2093. doi: 10.1023/a:1018874602790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grol R., Thomas S., Roberts R. Development and implementation of guidelines for family practice: lessons from The Netherlands. J Fam Pract. 1995 May;40(5):435–439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Heaton K. W., O'Donnell L. J., Braddon F. E., Mountford R. A., Hughes A. O., Cripps P. J. Symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome in a British urban community: consulters and nonconsulters. Gastroenterology. 1992 Jun;102(6):1962–1967. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)90320-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heikkinen M., Pikkarainen P., Takala J., Julkunen R. General practitioners' approach to dyspepsia. Survey of consultation frequencies, treatment, and investigations. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1996 Jul;31(7):648–653. doi: 10.3109/00365529609009144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heikkinen M., Pikkarainen P., Takala J., Räsänen H., Julkunen R. Etiology of dyspepsia: four hundred unselected consecutive patients in general practice. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995 Jun;30(6):519–523. doi: 10.3109/00365529509089783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hungin A. P., Thomas P. R., Bramble M. G., Corbett W. A., Idle N., Contractor B. R., Berridge D. C., Cann G. What happens to patients following open access gastroscopy? An outcome study from general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Nov;44(388):519–521. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jones R. H., Lydeard S. E., Hobbs F. D., Kenkre J. E., Williams E. I., Jones S. J., Repper J. A., Caldow J. L., Dunwoodie W. M., Bottomley J. M. Dyspepsia in England and Scotland. Gut. 1990 Apr;31(4):401–405. doi: 10.1136/gut.31.4.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones R., Lydeard S. Irritable bowel syndrome in the general population. BMJ. 1992 Jan 11;304(6819):87–90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6819.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kurata J. H., Nogawa A. N., Chen Y. K., Parker C. E. Dyspepsia in primary care: perceived causes, reasons for improvement, and satisfaction with care. J Fam Pract. 1997 Mar;44(3):281–288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mearin F., Malagelada J. R. Gastroparesis and dyspepsia in patients with diabetes mellitus. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995 Aug;7(8):717–723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Penston J. G., Pounder R. E. A survey of dyspepsia in Great Britain. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1996 Feb;10(1):83–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1996.tb00180.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Richter J. E. Dyspepsia: organic causes and differential characteristics from functional dyspepsia. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1991;182:11–16. doi: 10.3109/00365529109109531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Talley N. J., Boyce P. M., Jones M. Predictors of health care seeking for irritable bowel syndrome: a population based study. Gut. 1997 Sep;41(3):394–398. doi: 10.1136/gut.41.3.394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Talley N. J., Weaver A. L., Tesmer D. L., Zinsmeister A. R. Lack of discriminant value of dyspepsia subgroups in patients referred for upper endoscopy. Gastroenterology. 1993 Nov;105(5):1378–1386. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90142-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Waldron I., Jacobs J. A. Effects of multiple roles on women's health--evidence from a national longitudinal study. Women Health. 1989;15(1):3–19. doi: 10.1300/J013v15n01_02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Warndorff D. K., Knottnerus J. A., Huijnen L. G., Starmans R. How well do general practitioners manage dyspepsia? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Dec;39(329):499–502. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. den Hartog G., Mulder C. J., Thies J. E., Wiersma T. G. The constipated stomach. An underdiagnosed problem in patients with abdominal pain? Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1998;225:41–46. doi: 10.1080/003655298750027218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Postgraduate Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES