Skip to main content
PMC home page
Postgraduate Medical Journal logoLink to Postgraduate Medical Journal
. 2002 Jun;78(920):322–326. doi: 10.1136/pmj.78.920.322

Stroke care: how do we measure quality?

K Walsh 1, P Gompertz 1, A Rudd 1
PMCID: PMC1742374  PMID: 12151683

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review the methods used to measure quality of stroke care. Relevant articles were searched for on Medline using the following key words: stroke, quality, outcome of care, process of care, structure of care. Articles that examined how to measure the quality of stroke care and that examined difficulties in the measurement of care outcomes, processes, and structures were selected. Selected articles were reviewed to summarise methods used to measure quality of stroke care and the primary outcome measures of the studies were extracted. Conclusions were drawn about the best ways to measure the quality of stroke care. Practical problems in using outcome measures to monitor quality of care include the consequences of case mix and difficulties in risk adjustment. Clinicians may use process measures to understand differences in outcome. Once a process of care has been linked to an outcome measure, this care process should be measured. The national sentinel audit for stroke is an audit tool used to examine the quality of the processes of stroke care.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (88.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alexander M. P. Stroke rehabilitation outcome. A potential use of predictive variables to establish levels of care. Stroke. 1994 Jan;25(1):128–134. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.1.128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson C. Baseline measures and outcome predictions. Neuroepidemiology. 1994;13(6):283–289. doi: 10.1159/000110392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson C., Laubscher S., Burns R. Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients. Stroke. 1996 Oct;27(10):1812–1816. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.10.1812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bamford J., Sandercock P., Dennis M., Warlow C., Jones L., McPherson K., Vessey M., Fowler G., Molyneux A., Hughes T. A prospective study of acute cerebrovascular disease in the community: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project 1981-86. 1. Methodology, demography and incident cases of first-ever stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988 Nov;51(11):1373–1380. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.51.11.1373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berwick D. M. Toward an applied technology for quality measurement in health care. Med Decis Making. 1988 Oct-Dec;8(4):253–258. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8800800405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonita R. Epidemiology of stroke. Lancet. 1992 Feb 8;339(8789):342–344. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91658-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bounds J. V., Wiebers D. O., Whisnant J. P., Okazaki H. Mechanisms and timing of deaths from cerebral infarction. Stroke. 1981 Jul-Aug;12(4):474–477. doi: 10.1161/01.str.12.4.474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carpenter L. M. Is the study worth doing? Lancet. 1993 Jul 24;342(8865):221–223. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92304-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chan K. W., Walker A. M., Yood R. A. An equilibrium model of drug utilization. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Jan;46(1):113–121. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90016-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davenport R. J., Dennis M. S., Warlow C. P. Effect of correcting outcome data for case mix: an example from stroke medicine. BMJ. 1996 Jun 15;312(7045):1503–1505. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7045.1503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Jul;44(3 Suppl):166–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dubois R. W., Rogers W. H., Moxley J. H., 3rd, Draper D., Brook R. H. Hospital inpatient mortality. Is it a predictor of quality? N Engl J Med. 1987 Dec 24;317(26):1674–1680. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198712243172626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fink A., Yano E. M., Brook R. H. The condition of the literature on differences in hospital mortality. Med Care. 1989 Apr;27(4):315–336. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198904000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Freed M. M., Wainapel S. F. Predictors of stroke outcome. Am Fam Physician. 1983 Nov;28(5):119–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gompertz P. H., Irwin P., Morris R., Lowe D., Rutledge Z., Rudd A. G., Pearson M. G. Reliability and validity of the Intercollegiate Stroke Audit Package. J Eval Clin Pract. 2001 Feb;7(1):1–11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00274.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gompertz P., Dennis M., Hopkins A., Ebrahim S. Development and reliability of the Royal College of Physicians stroke audit form. UK Stroke Audit Group. Age Ageing. 1994 Sep;23(5):378–383. doi: 10.1093/ageing/23.5.378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gompertz P., Pound P., Briffa J., Ebrahim S. How useful are non-random comparisons of outcomes and quality of care in purchasing hospital stroke services? Age Ageing. 1995 Mar;24(2):137–141. doi: 10.1093/ageing/24.2.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gulliford M. C., Petruckevitch A., Burney P. G. Hospital case notes and medical audit: evaluation of non-response. BMJ. 1991 May 11;302(6785):1128–1129. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6785.1128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Haines A., Jones R. Implementing findings of research. BMJ. 1994 Jun 4;308(6942):1488–1492. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6942.1488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hammermeister K. E., Shroyer A. L., Sethi G. K., Grover F. L. Why it is important to demonstrate linkages between outcomes of care and processes and structures of care. Med Care. 1995 Oct;33(10 Suppl):OS5–O16. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199510001-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hankey G. J., Dennis M. S., Slattery J. M., Warlow C. P. Why is the outcome of transient ischaemic attacks different in different groups of patients? BMJ. 1993 Apr 24;306(6885):1107–1111. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6885.1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hopkins A. Clinical audit: time for a reappraisal? J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1996 Sep-Oct;30(5):415–425. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Irwin P., Rudd A. Casemix and process indicators of outcome in stroke. The Royal College of Physicians minimum data set for stroke. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1998 Sep-Oct;32(5):442–444. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jessee W. F., Schranz C. M. Medicare mortality rates and hospital quality: are they related? Qual Assur Health Care. 1990;2(2):137–144. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/2.2.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jørgensen H. S., Nakayama H., Raaschou H. O., Vive-Larsen J., Støier M., Olsen T. S. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 May;76(5):406–412. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80568-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kahn K. L., Rogers W. H., Rubenstein L. V., Sherwood M. J., Reinisch E. J., Keeler E. B., Draper D., Kosecoff J., Brook R. H. Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system. JAMA. 1990 Oct 17;264(15):1969–1973. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kessner D. M., Kalk C. E., Singer J. Assessing health quality--the case for tracers. N Engl J Med. 1973 Jan 25;288(4):189–194. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197301252880406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kramer A. M., Coleman E. A. Stroke rehabilitation in nursing homes: how do we measure quality? Clin Geriatr Med. 1999 Nov;15(4):869–884. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee A. J., Huber J. H., Stason W. B. Factors contributing to practice variation in post-stroke rehabilitation. Health Serv Res. 1997 Jun;32(2):197–227. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lohr K. N. Outcome measurement: concepts and questions. Inquiry. 1988 Spring;25(1):37–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lohr K. N., Schroeder S. A. A strategy for quality assurance in Medicare. N Engl J Med. 1990 Mar 8;322(10):707–712. doi: 10.1056/nejm199003083221031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mant J., Hicks N. Detecting differences in quality of care: the sensitivity of measures of process and outcome in treating acute myocardial infarction. BMJ. 1995 Sep 23;311(7008):793–796. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7008.793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nobrega F. T., Morrow G. W., Smoldt R. K., Offord K. P. Quality assessment in hypertension: analysis of process and outcome methods. N Engl J Med. 1977 Jan 20;296(3):145–148. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197701202960305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. O'Rourke S., MacHale S., Signorini D., Dennis M. Detecting psychiatric morbidity after stroke: comparison of the GHQ and the HAD Scale. Stroke. 1998 May;29(5):980–985. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.5.980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Orchard C. Comparing healthcare outcomes. BMJ. 1994 Jun 4;308(6942):1493–1496. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6942.1493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Parsonnet V., Dean D., Bernstein A. D. A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease. Circulation. 1989 Jun;79(6 Pt 2):I3–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Poloniecki J. Half of all doctors are below average. BMJ. 1998 Jun 6;316(7146):1734–1736. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7146.1734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Poloniecki J., Valencia O., Littlejohns P. Cumulative risk adjusted mortality chart for detecting changes in death rate: observational study of heart surgery. BMJ. 1998 Jun 6;316(7146):1697–1700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7146.1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Powell J., Pandyan A. D., Granat M., Cameron M., Stott D. J. Electrical stimulation of wrist extensors in poststroke hemiplegia. Stroke. 1999 Jul;30(7):1384–1389. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.7.1384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ring H., Tshuva M., Ronen R., Dynia A., Eldar R. Quality of care on a stroke rehabilitation ward: the use of urinary incontinence as tracer. Int J Rehabil Res. 1998 Jun;21(2):241–245. doi: 10.1097/00004356-199806000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rubenstein L. V., Kahn K. L., Reinisch E. J., Sherwood M. J., Rogers W. H., Kamberg C., Draper D., Brook R. H. Changes in quality of care for five diseases measured by implicit review, 1981 to 1986. JAMA. 1990 Oct 17;264(15):1974–1979. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rudd A. G., Irwin P., Rutledge Z., Lowe D., Wade D., Morris R., Pearson M. G. The national sentinel audit for stroke: a tool for raising standards of care. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1999 Sep-Oct;33(5):460–464. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Scholte op Reimer W. J., de Haan R. J., Limburg M., van den Bos G. A. Patients' satisfaction with care after stroke: relation with characteristics of patients and care. Qual Health Care. 1996 Sep;5(3):144–150. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.3.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shah S., Vanclay F., Cooper B. Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1990 Feb;21(2):241–246. doi: 10.1161/01.str.21.2.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sheldon T. A., Borowitz M. Changing the measure of quality in the NHS: from purchasing activity to purchasing protocols. Qual Health Care. 1993 Sep;2(3):149–150. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.3.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Silver F. L., Norris J. W., Lewis A. J., Hachinski V. C. Early mortality following stroke: a prospective review. Stroke. 1984 May-Jun;15(3):492–496. doi: 10.1161/01.str.15.3.492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wen S. W., Hernandez R., Naylor C. D. Pitfalls in nonrandomized outcomes studies. The case of incidental appendectomy with open cholecystectomy. JAMA. 1995 Dec 6;274(21):1687–1691. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.21.1687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Postgraduate Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES