Abstract
Background: Although day care laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) has been shown to be safe in centres with adequate infrastructure for day care surgery, its feasibility and safety in developing countries has never been studied. Because of differences in the quality of health care delivery, western guidelines for day care surgery cannot be universally applied to developing countries.
Patients and methods: Patients less than 65 years who were graded I and II on the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score, irrespective of their educational status, living within 20 km, and willing to make their own arrangements for a return to hospital in case of problems were selected for DCLC. Follow up was done by patients calling the hospital the morning after surgery.
Results: 50% of the eligibility criteria were new; 313/383 patients were suitable for DCLC. The commonest cause for rejection was that the patient lived out of the defined area (50%). Altogether 92% were discharged within eight hours of surgery. The reasons for failure to discharge were the presence of abdominal drains in four (2%), nausea and vomiting in nine (3%), and conversion to open surgery in five (2%). Ten patients (3%) were readmitted; of these only two (<1%) had complications needing re-exploration. Analysis of results showed that the inclusion and discharge criteria were valid and that the readmission and complication rates as well as the ease and accuracy of follow up were comparable to published data. DCLC reduced waiting times and increased patient turnover and may have a positive impact on resident training.
Conclusions: DCLC is safe, feasible, and has potential benefits for health care delivery in developing countries. Each surgical service needs to develop their own guidelines based on local patient demography.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (63.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Böckler D., Geoghegan J., Klein M., Weissmann Q., Turan M., Meyer L., Scheele J. Implications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for surgical residency training. JSLS. 1999 Jan-Mar;3(1):19–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fiorillo M. A., Davidson P. G., Fiorillo M., D'Anna J. A., Jr, Sithian N., Silich R. J. 149 ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc. 1996 Jan;10(1):52–56. doi: 10.1007/s004649910013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fleisher L. A., Yee K., Lillemoe K. D., Talamini M. A., Yeo C. J., Heath R., Bass E., Snyder D. S., Parker S. D. Is outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe and cost-effective? A model to study transition of care. Anesthesiology. 1999 Jun;90(6):1746–1755. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199906000-00033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kleinpell R. M. Improving telephone follow-up after ambulatory surgery. J Perianesth Nurs. 1997 Oct;12(5):336–340. doi: 10.1016/s1089-9472(97)80052-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lillemoe K. D., Lin J. W., Talamini M. A., Yeo C. J., Snyder D. S., Parker S. D. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a "true" outpatient procedure: initial experience in 130 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999 Jan-Feb;3(1):44–49. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80007-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mandhan P., Shah A., Khan A. W., Muniruddin, Hasan N. Outpatient pediatric surgery in a developing country. J Pak Med Assoc. 2000 Jul;50(7):220–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Margovsky A. Unplanned admissions in day-case surgery as a clinical indicator for quality assurance. Aust N Z J Surg. 2000 Mar;70(3):216–220. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01789.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell R. B., Pereira K. D., Friedman N. R., Lazar R. H. Outpatient adenotonsillectomy. Is it safe in children younger than 3 years? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Jul;123(7):681–683. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900070019003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mjåland O., Raeder J., Aasboe V., Trondsen E., Buanes T. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997 Jul;84(7):958–961. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800840714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Namias N., McKenney M. G., Sleeman D., Hutson D. G. Trends in resident experience in open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997 Jun;7(3):245–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pollard J. B., Olson L. Early outpatient preoperative anesthesia assessment: does it help to reduce operating room cancellations? Anesth Analg. 1999 Aug;89(2):502–505. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199908000-00048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prasad A., Foley R. J. Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a safe and cost effective procedure. Eur J Surg. 1996 Jan;162(1):43–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramanujam T. M., Uma G., Usha V., Ramanathan S., Sujaritha R. Advantages and limitations of day surgery in children in a developing country. Pediatr Surg Int. 1998 Sep;13(7):512–514. doi: 10.1007/s003830050386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schloss M. D., Tan A. K., Schloss B., Tewfik T. L. Outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy: complications and recommendations. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1994 Aug;30(2):115–122. doi: 10.1016/0165-5876(94)90194-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schol F. P., GO P. M., Gouma D. J., Kootstra G. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a surgical training programme. Eur J Surg. 1996 Mar;162(3):193–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shaper N. J., Harrison M., Bates T. Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on surgical training. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996 Jan;78(1):39–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith R., Kolyn D., Pace R. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB Surg. 1994;7(4):261–264. doi: 10.1155/1994/70629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stephenson B. M., Callander C., Sage M., Vellacott K. D. Feasibility of 'day case' laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993 Jul;75(4):249–251. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Twersky R., Fishman D., Homel P. What happens after discharge? Return hospital visits after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1997 Feb;84(2):319–324. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199702000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
