Abstract
Background and objective: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically demanding endoscopic procedure that varies from a simple diagnostic to a highly complex therapeutic procedure. Simple outcome measures such as success and complication rates do not reflect the competence of the operator or endoscopy unit, as case mix is not taken into account. A grading scale to assess the technical difficulty of ERCP can improve the objectivity of outcome data.
Methods: A I to IV technical difficulty grading scale was constructed and applied prospectively to all ERCPs over a 12 month period at a single centre. The procedures were performed by two senior trainees and two experienced consultants (trainers). The grading scale was validated for construct validity and inter-rater reliability at the end of the study using the χ2 test and κ statistics.
Results: There were 305 ERCPs in 259 patients over the 12 months study period (males: 112, females: 147, age range 17–97, mean 70.3 years). There was overall success in 244 (80%) procedures with complications in 13 (4%): bleeding in five (1.6%), cholangitis in one (0.3%), pancreatitis in five (1.6%), and perforation in two (0.7%). Success rate was highest for grade I, 49/55 (89%), compared with grade IV procedures, 8/11 (73%). There was a significant linear trend towards a lower success rate from grade I to IV (p=0.021) for trainees, but not for trainers. Complications were low in grade I, II, and III procedures, 12/295(4%), compared with grade IV procedures, 1/11(9%). The inter-rater reliability for the grading scale was good with a substantial agreement between the raters (κ=0.68, p<0.001).
Conclusion: Success and complications of ERCP by trainees are influenced by the technical difficulty of the procedure. Outcome data incorporating a grading scale can give accurate information when auditing the qualitative outcomes. This can provide a platform for structured objective evaluation.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (116.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baillie John. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: the gastroenterologist's perspective. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jun;55(7 Suppl):S13–S15. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.124750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cotton P. B., Lehman G., Vennes J., Geenen J. E., Russell R. C., Meyers W. C., Liguory C., Nickl N. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 May-Jun;37(3):383–393. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70740-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fleischer D. E., Van de Mierop F., Eisen G. M., al-Kawas F. H., Benjamin S. B., Lewis J. H., Nguyen C. C., Avigan M., Tio T. L., Kidwell J. A. A new system for defining endoscopic complications emphasizing the measure of importance. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Feb;45(2):128–133. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70234-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jowell P. S., Baillie J., Branch M. S., Affronti J., Browning C. L., Bute B. P. Quantitative assessment of procedural competence. A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Intern Med. 1996 Dec 15;125(12):983–989. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-12-199612150-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lobo D. N., Balfour T. W., Iftikhar S. Y. Periampullary diverticula: consequences of failed ERCP. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998 Sep;80(5):326–331. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loperfido S., Angelini G., Benedetti G., Chilovi F., Costan F., De Berardinis F., De Bernardin M., Ederle A., Fina P., Fratton A. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Jul;48(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70121-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palazzo Laurent, O'toole Dermot. EUS in common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Oct;56(4 Suppl):S49–S57. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70086-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rabenstein T., Schneider H. T., Nicklas M., Ruppert T., Katalinic A., Hahn E. G., Ell C. Impact of skill and experience of the endoscopist on the outcome of endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Nov;50(5):628–636. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)80010-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schutz S. M., Abbott R. M. Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 May;51(5):535–539. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70285-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanner A. R. ERCP: present practice in a single region. Suggested standards for monitoring performance. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996 Feb;8(2):145–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]