Abstract
Background: Local observation has suggested that placing limb leads on the torso when recording the standard 12-lead resting electrocardiogram (ECG) has become commonplace. This non-standard modification has the important advantages of ease and speed of application, and in an emergency may be applied with minimal undressing. Limb movement artefact is also reduced. It is believed that ECGs obtained with torso electrodes are interchangeable with standard ECGs and any minor electrocardiographic variations do not affect diagnostic interpretation.
Study design: The study compared 12-lead ECGs in 100 patients during routine electrocardiography, one being taken in the approved way and one taken with modified limb electrodes.
Results: It was found that the use of torso leads produced important amplitude and waveform changes associated with a more vertical and rightward shift of the QRS frontal axis, particularly in those with abnormal standard ECGs. Such changes generated important ECG abnormalities in 36% of patients with normal standard ECGs, suggesting "heart disease of electrocardiographic origin". In those with abnormal standard ECGs, moving the limb leads to the torso made eight possible myocardial infarcts appear and five inferior infarcts disappeared. Twelve others developed clinically important T wave or QRS frontal axis changes.
Conclusions: It is vital that ECGs should be acquired in the standard way unless there are particular reasons for not doing so, and that any modification of electrode placement must be reported on the ECG itself. Marking the ECG "torso-positioned limb leads" or "non-standard" should alert the clinician to its limitations for clinical or investigative purposes, as any lead adaptation may modify the tracing and could result in misinterpretation.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (159.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Diamond D., Griffith D. H., Greenberg M. L., Carleton R. A. Torso mounted electrocardiographic electrodes for routine clinical electrocardiography. J Electrocardiol. 1979 Oct;12(4):403–406. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(79)80010-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edenbrandt L., Pahlm O., Sörnmo L. An accurate exercise lead system for bicycle ergometer tests. Eur Heart J. 1989 Mar;10(3):268–272. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fesmire F. M., Smith E. E. Continuous 12-lead electrocardiograph monitoring in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 1993 Jan;11(1):54–60. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(93)90061-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kleiner J. P., Nelson W. P., Boland M. J. The 12-lead electrocardiogram in exercise testing. A misleading baseline? Arch Intern Med. 1978 Oct;138(10):1572–1573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mason R. E., Likar I. A new system of multiple-lead exercise electrocardiography. Am Heart J. 1966 Feb;71(2):196–205. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(66)90182-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Papouchado M., Walker P. R., James M. A., Clarke L. M. Fundamental differences between the standard 12-lead electrocardiograph and the modified (Mason-Likar) exercise lead system. Eur Heart J. 1987 Jul;8(7):725–733. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/8.7.725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rautaharju P. M., Prineas R. J., Crow R. S., Seale D., Furberg C. The effect of modified limb electrode positions on electrocardiographic wave amplitudes. J Electrocardiol. 1980 Apr;13(2):109–113. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(80)80040-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sevilla D. C., Dohrmann M. L., Somelofski C. A., Wawrzynski R. P., Wagner N. B., Wagner G. S. Invalidation of the resting electrocardiogram obtained via exercise electrode sites as a standard 12-lead recording. Am J Cardiol. 1989 Jan 1;63(1):35–39. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)91072-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takuma K., Hori S., Sasaki J., Shinozawa Y., Yoshikawa T., Handa S., Horikawa M., Aikawa N. An alternative limb lead system for electrocardiographs in emergency patients. Am J Emerg Med. 1995 Sep;13(5):514–517. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90160-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]