Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to assess how well completed the new consent forms are for patients undergoing renal transplantation.
Methodology: 100 patients were randomly selected from the 160 who had a renal transplantation, at a single centre in the UK, over an 18 month period. The notes were located and the consent forms scrutinised.
Findings: Seven sets of notes could not be traced and 10 did not contain a relevant consent form. Forty eight per cent of completed forms mentioned the source of organ while 8% mentioned on which side the operation was to be performed. Twelve risks and complications were identified as being relevant to this procedure but no single form mentioned all 12. In most cases a senior member of the surgical team obtained consent.
Implications: The demonstrated variability in the amount of detail on consent forms lends weight to the call for the use of procedure specific forms. While such variability does not necessarily equate with not gaining valid, informed consent, this form, at present, serves as the only record of what has been discussed with the patient. These findings should encourage all surgeons to complete the forms themselves, be as detailed as possible, and ensure that the form is filed in the patients' notes.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (49.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Langdon I. J., Hardin R., Learmonth I. D. Informed consent for total hip arthroplasty: does a written information sheet improve recall by patients? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Nov;84(6):404–408. doi: 10.1308/003588402760978201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mayberry M. K., Mayberry J. F. Towards better informed consent in endoscopy: a study of information and consent processes in gastroscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001 Dec;13(12):1467–1476. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200112000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McLaren A., Morris-Stiff G., Casey J. Issues of consent in renal transplantation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001 Sep;83(5):343–346. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rudge Chris J., Fuggle Susan V., Burbidge Kerri M. Geographic disparities in access to organ transplantation in the United Kingdom. Transplantation. 2003 Nov 15;76(9):1395–1398. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000090436.01712.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soot L. C., Moneta G. L., Edwards J. M. Vascular surgery and the Internet: a poor source of patient-oriented information. J Vasc Surg. 1999 Jul;30(1):84–91. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70179-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sunil S., Austin R., Sinha S. Issues of consent in renal transplantation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003 Mar;85(2):144–145. doi: 10.1308/003588403321220090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tattersall Martin H. N., Butow Phyllis N. Consultation audio tapes: an underused cancer patient information aid and clinical research tool. Lancet Oncol. 2002 Jul;3(7):431–437. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(02)00790-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Webber W. B., Summers A. N., Rinehart G. C. Computer-based multimedia in plastic surgery education. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 May;93(6):1290–1300. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199405000-00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]