Abstract
Background: Co-morbidity, or the presence of more than one clinical condition, is gaining increased attention in epidemiological and health services research. However, the clinical relevance of co-morbidity has yet to be defined. In general practice, few studies have been conducted into co-morbidity, either at a single health care encounter, an episode of care, or for a defined time period.
Aims: To describe the major co-morbidity cluster profiles recorded by general practitioners. Another aim of this study is to describe the common clusters of co-prescribing.
Methods and results: Twelve month data from patients attending 156 GPs from 95 practices around a six month period of January to June 2003 were analysed. This represented 840 961 encounters from about 200 000 individual patients at these participating practices. Co-morbidity and co-prescribing cluster profiles are represented by problems managed and reasons for prescribing for the top 10 presentations and top 10 prescribed drugs in the study period.
Conclusions: By analysing the 10 most prevalent problems and 10 most prevalent drugs prescribed in consultations in a community sample, other co-morbidities that are particular to general practice, for example hypertension and lipid disorders, can be uncovered. Whether these clusters are causally related or occur by chance requires further analysis.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (68.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Britten N., Jenkins L., Barber N., Bradley C., Stevenson F. Developing a measure for the appropriateness of prescribing in general practice. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Aug;12(4):246–250. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.4.246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlson M. E., Pompei P., Ales K. L., MacKenzie C. R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deyo R. A., Cherkin D. C., Ciol M. A. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;45(6):613–619. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elixhauser A., Steiner C., Harris D. R., Coffey R. M. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998 Jan;36(1):8–27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gettman Matthew T., Boelter Christopher W., Cheville John C., Zincke Horst, Bryant Sandra C., Blute Michael L. Charlson co-morbidity index as a predictor of outcome after surgery for renal cell carcinoma with renal vein, vena cava or right atrium extension. J Urol. 2003 Apr;169(4):1282–1286. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000049093.03392.cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gijsen R., Hoeymans N., Schellevis F. G., Ruwaard D., Satariano W. A., van den Bos G. A. Causes and consequences of comorbidity: a review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Jul;54(7):661–674. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00363-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macleod Una, Mitchell Elizabeth, Black Margaret, Spence Gerald. Comorbidity and socioeconomic deprivation: an observational study of the prevalence of comorbidity in general practice. Eur J Gen Pract. 2004 Mar;10(1):24–26. doi: 10.3109/13814780409094223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melartin Tarja K., Rytsälä Heikki J., Leskelä Ulla S., Lestelä-Mielonen Paula S., Sokero T. Petteri, Isometsä Erkki T. Current comorbidity of psychiatric disorders among DSM-IV major depressive disorder patients in psychiatric care in the Vantaa Depression Study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;63(2):126–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sayer Geoffrey P., McGeechan Kevin, Kemp Andrew, Bhasale Alice, Horn Fiona, Hendrie Leigh, Swan Lisa, Scahill Sharon. The General Practice Research Network: the capabilities of an electronic patient management system for longitudinal patient data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003 Sep;12(6):483–489. doi: 10.1002/pds.834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schellevis F. G., van der Velden J., van de Lisdonk E., van Eijk J. T., van Weel C. Comorbidity of chronic diseases in general practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 May;46(5):469–473. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90024-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schellevis F. G., van der Velden J., van de Lisdonk E., van Eijk J. T., van Weel C. Comorbidity of chronic diseases in general practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 May;46(5):469–473. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90024-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneeweiss S., Maclure M. Use of comorbidity scores for control of confounding in studies using administrative databases. Int J Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;29(5):891–898. doi: 10.1093/ije/29.5.891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schultz R. Cardiovascular disease & depression. Aust Fam Physician. 2001 Mar;30(3):219–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Starfield Barbara, Lemke Klaus W., Bernhardt Terence, Foldes Steven S., Forrest Christopher B., Weiner Jonathan P. Comorbidity: implications for the importance of primary care in 'case' management. Ann Fam Med. 2003 May-Jun;1(1):8–14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Starfield Barbara, Lemke Klaus W., Bernhardt Terence, Foldes Steven S., Forrest Christopher B., Weiner Jonathan P. Comorbidity: implications for the importance of primary care in 'case' management. Ann Fam Med. 2003 May-Jun;1(1):8–14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Starfield Barbara, Lemke Klaus W., Bernhardt Terence, Foldes Steven S., Forrest Christopher B., Weiner Jonathan P. Comorbidity: implications for the importance of primary care in 'case' management. Ann Fam Med. 2003 May-Jun;1(1):8–14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]