Skip to main content
Postgraduate Medical Journal logoLink to Postgraduate Medical Journal
. 2005 Jul;81(957):467–469. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.027516

Measuring the quality of referral letters about patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms

M Jiwa 1, M Coleman 1, R McKinley 1
PMCID: PMC1743314  PMID: 15998825

Abstract

Background: General practitioners state the reason for referring patients in referral letters. The paucity of information in these letters has been the source of criticism from specialist colleagues.

Objective: To invite general practitioners to set standards for referral letters to gastroenterologists and to apply these standards to actual referral letters to one specialist gastroenterology unit.

Methods: A scoring schedule was designed based on the responses to a questionnaire survey of a large sample of all general practitioners in one locality. Altogether 350 consecutive letters to a district general hospital about patients referred for an upper gastrointestinal specialist opinion were subsequently scored using the schedule.

Results: 102 practitioners responded to the survey. Their responses imply that colleagues assess and record findings on 18 potential features of upper bowel disease. In practice most referral letters address fewer than six features of upper bowel disease. The mean number of positive features of upper gastrointestinal disease reported in each letter was one.

Conclusions: This study reported a failure to meet "peer defined" standards for the content of referral letters set by colleagues in one locality. Referral letters serve many purposes, however, encouraging full documentation of specific clinical findings may serve to increase the pre-referral assessments performed in practice.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (59.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berg M., Goorman E. The contextual nature of medical information. Int J Med Inform. 1999 Dec;56(1-3):51–60. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(99)00041-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowling A., Redfern J. The process of outpatient referral and care: the experiences and views of patients, their general practitioners, and specialists. Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Feb;50(451):116–120. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell Bruce, Vanslembroek Katalijne, Whitehead Emma, van de Wauwer Caroline, Eifell Ronald, Wyatt Michael, Campbell John. Views of doctors on clinical correspondence: questionnaire survey and audit of content of letters. BMJ. 2004 May 1;328(7447):1060–1061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38058.801968.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Graham P. H., Wilson G. Letters from the radiation oncologist: do referring doctors give a damn? Australas Radiol. 1998 Aug;42(3):222–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1998.tb00498.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Heikkinen M., Pikkarainen P., Eskelinen M., Julkunen R. GPs' ability to diagnose dyspepsia based only on physical examination and patient history. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2000 Jun;18(2):99–104. doi: 10.1080/028134300750018981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hodge J. A., Jacob A., Ford M. J., Munro J. F. Medical clinic referral letters. Do they say what they mean? Do they mean what they say? Scott Med J. 1992 Dec;37(6):179–180. doi: 10.1177/003693309203700606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jenkins R. M. Quality of general practitioner referrals to outpatient departments: assessment by specialists and a general practitioner. Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Mar;43(368):111–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones J., Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ. 1995 Aug 5;311(7001):376–380. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Little Paul, Dorward Martina, Warner Greg, Stephens Katharine, Senior Jane, Moore Michael. Importance of patient pressure and perceived pressure and perceived medical need for investigations, referral, and prescribing in primary care: nested observational study. BMJ. 2004 Feb 13;328(7437):444–444. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38013.644086.7C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mead G. E., Cunnington A. L., Faulkner S., Russell K. J., Ford M. J. Can general practitioner referral letters for acute medical admissions be improved? Health Bull (Edinb) 1999 Jul;57(4):257–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. van Bommel M. J., Numans M. E., de Wit N. J., Stalman W. A. Consultations and referrals for dyspepsia in general practice--a one year database survey. Postgrad Med J. 2001 Aug;77(910):514–518. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.910.514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Postgraduate Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES