Skip to main content
PMC home page
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 2001 Mar;10(1):17–22. doi: 10.1136/qhc.10.1.17

Development of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire: dimensions, validity, and internal reliability

L Smith 1
PMCID: PMC1743424  PMID: 11239139

Abstract

Background—No published quantitative instrument exists to measure maternal satisfaction with the quality of different models of labour care in the UK.

Methods—A quantitative psychometric multidimensional maternal satisfaction questionnaire, the Women's Views of Birth Labour Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ), was developed using principal components analysis with varimax rotation of successive versions. Internal reliability and content and construct validity were assessed.

Results—Of 300 women sent the first version (WOMBLSQ1), 120 (40%) replied; of 300 sent WOMBLSQ2, 188 (62.7%) replied; of 500 women sent WOMBLSQ3, 319 (63.8%) replied; and of 2400 women sent WOMBLSQ4, 1683 (70.1%) replied. The latter two versions consisted of 10 dimensions in addition to general satisfaction. These were (Cronbach's alpha): professional support in labour (0.91), expectations of labour (0.90), home assessment in early labour (0.90), holding the baby (0.87), support from husband/partner (0.83), pain relief in labour (0.83), pain relief immediately after labour (0.65), knowing labour carers (0.82), labour environment (0.80), and control in labour (0.62). There were moderate correlations (range 0.16–0.73) between individual dimensions and the general satisfaction scale (0.75). Scores on individual dimensions were significantly related to a range of clinical and demographic variables.

Conclusion—This multidimensional labour satisfaction instrument has good validity and internal reliability. It could be used to assess care in labour across different models of maternity care, or as a prelude to in depth exploration of specific areas of concern. Its external reliability and transferability to care outside the South West region needs further evaluation, particularly in terms of ethnicity and social class.

Key Words: Women's Views of Birth Labour Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ); labour; questionnaire

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (129.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker R. Development of a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction with consultations in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Dec;40(341):487–490. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker R. The reliability and criterion validity of a measure of patients' satisfaction with their general practice. Fam Pract. 1991 Jun;8(2):171–177. doi: 10.1093/fampra/8.2.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakketeig L. S. Only a minor part of cerebral palsy cases begin in labour. But still room for controversial childbirth issues in court. BMJ. 1999 Oct 16;319(7216):1016–1017. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7216.1016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carr-Hill R. A. The measurement of patient satisfaction. J Public Health Med. 1992 Sep;14(3):236–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang K. Dimensions and indicators of patients' perceived nursing care quality in the hospital setting. J Nurs Care Qual. 1997 Aug;11(6):26–37. doi: 10.1097/00001786-199708000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flint C., Poulengeris P., Grant A. The 'Know Your Midwife' scheme--a randomised trial of continuity of care by a team of midwives. Midwifery. 1989 Mar;5(1):11–16. doi: 10.1016/s0266-6138(89)80059-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grogan S., Conner M., Willits D., Norman P. Development of a questionnaire to measure patients' satisfaction with general practitioners' services. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Oct;45(399):525–529. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hall J. A., Dornan M. C. Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction levels. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(6):637–644. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90012-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hall J. A., Dornan M. C. What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(9):935–939. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90284-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kojo-Austin H., Malin M., Hemminki E. Women's satisfaction with maternity health care services in Finland. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Sep;37(5):633–638. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90102-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kowalski K., Gottschalk J., Greer B., Bowes W. A., Jr Team nursing coverage of prenatal-intrapartum patients at a university hospital. An innovation in obstetric nursing. Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Jul;50(1):116–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lewis J. R. Patient views on quality care in general practice: literature review. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Sep;39(5):655–670. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Locker D., Dunt D. Theoretical and methodological issues in sociological studies of consumer satisfaction with medical care. Soc Sci Med. 1978 Jul;12(4A):283–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mahon P. Y. An analysis of the concept 'patient satisfaction' as it relates to contemporary nursing care. J Adv Nurs. 1996 Dec;24(6):1241–1248. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb01031.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McKinley R. K., Manku-Scott T., Hastings A. M., French D. P., Baker R. Reliability and validity of a new measure of patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care in the United Kingdom: development of a patient questionnaire. BMJ. 1997 Jan 18;314(7075):193–198. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7075.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Poulton B. C. Use of the consultation satisfaction questionnaire to examine patients' satisfaction with general practitioners and community nurses: reliability, replicability and discriminant validity. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Jan;46(402):26–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Powers K. A., McCloskey C. R. The childbearing experience: a prototype for the study of continuity of care. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 1981 Jan-Feb;5(1):53–66. doi: 10.3109/01460868109105383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smith L. F. The WOMB (Women's views of birth) antenatal satisfaction questionnaire: development, dimensions, internal reliability, and validity. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Dec;49(449):971–975. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith L. F. Views of pregnant women on the involvement of general practitioners in maternity care. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Feb;46(403):101–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Séguin L., Therrien R., Champagne F., Larouche D. The components of women's satisfaction with maternity care. Birth. 1989 Sep;16(3):109–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1989.tb00878.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? Soc Sci Med. 1994 Feb;38(4):509–516. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90247-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Williams S. J., Calnan M. Key determinants of consumer satisfaction with general practice. Fam Pract. 1991 Sep;8(3):237–242. doi: 10.1093/fampra/8.3.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Williams S. J., Calnan M. Key determinants of consumer satisfaction with general practice. Fam Pract. 1991 Sep;8(3):237–242. doi: 10.1093/fampra/8.3.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES