Skip to main content
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 2001 Sep;10(3):159–165. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100159..

Pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate the use of patient held records for the continuing care of patients with cancer

J Williams 1, W Cheung 1, N Chetwynd 1, D Cohen 1, S El-Sharkawi 1, I Finlay 1, B Lervy 1, M Longo 1, K Malinovszky 1
PMCID: PMC1743428  PMID: 11533423

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the use of a multidisciplinary record held by patients with cancer in the community.

Design—Pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Setting—The environs of Swansea in south west Wales.

Participants—501 patients under the care of the Department of Oncology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea.

Intervention—A patient held record used by the patient and healthcare professionals.

Main outcome measures—Health related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) measured at entry into the study and at 6 months; patients' views at 6 months; healthcare professionals' views collected after the completion of patient follow up; NHS resource and booklet use.

Results—1148 patients were eligible for the study; 501 were recruited (44%) and 344 completed the study (172 in each group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in change in quality of life or NHS resource use. The patient held record did not have an impact on communication but was significantly helpful to patients in preparing for appointments, reducing difficulties in monitoring their own progress, and helping them to feel more in control (p<0.05). Fifty three percent of patients would have preferred not to have a patient held record. There was a low level of use of the record by healthcare professionals but most of those who remembered using it indicated that they would prefer patients to have it.

Conclusions—The patient held record is valued by some patients and professionals but has no significant impact on the quality of life of patients or NHS resource use. It has a positive impact on quality by helping patients feel more in control and prepare for meetings with healthcare staff. Patients who find it useful tend to be younger and have more professionals involved in their care. It is recommended that it should be made available to patients on request and used by them according to need.

Key Words: cancer; patient held records; patients' views; professional views

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (167.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Briggs A., Gray A. The distribution of health care costs and their statistical analysis for economic evaluation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998 Oct;3(4):233–245. doi: 10.1177/135581969800300410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Drury M., Yudkin P., Harcourt J., Fitzpatrick R., Jones L., Alcock C., Minton M. Patients with cancer holding their own records: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Feb;50(451):105–110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Finlay I. G., Wyatt P. Randomised cross-over study of patient-held records in oncology and palliative care. Lancet. 1999 Feb 13;353(9152):558–559. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)05814-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Finlay I., Jones N., Wyatt P., Neil J. Use of an unstructured patient-held record in palliative care. Palliat Med. 1998 Sep;12(5):397–398. doi: 10.1191/026921698666540505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fisher B., Britten N. Patient access to records: expectations of hospital doctors and experiences of cancer patients. Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Feb;43(367):52–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gilhooly M. L., McGhee S. M. Medical records: practicalities and principles of patient possession. J Med Ethics. 1991 Sep;17(3):138–143. doi: 10.1136/jme.17.3.138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hickman M., Drummond N., Grimshaw J. A taxonomy of shared care for chronic disease. J Public Health Med. 1994 Dec;16(4):447–454. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a043026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liaw S. T. Patient and general practitioner perceptions of patient-held health records. Fam Pract. 1993 Dec;10(4):406–415. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.4.406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Roberts R. O., Bergstralh E. J., Schmidt L., Jacobsen S. J. Comparison of self-reported and medical record health care utilization measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Sep;49(9):989–995. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00143-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schwartz D., Lellouch J. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J Chronic Dis. 1967 Aug;20(8):637–648. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(67)90041-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stevens M. M. "Shuttle sheet": a patient-held medical record for pediatric oncology families. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1992;20(4):330–335. doi: 10.1002/mpo.2950200412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES