Abstract
Objectives—To develop and evaluate an information service in which a "clinical informaticist" (a GP with training in evidence-based medicine) provided evidence-based answers to questions posed by GPs and nurse practitioners.
Design—Descriptive pilot study with systematic recording of the process involved in searching for and critically appraising literature. Evaluation by questionnaire and semi-structured interview.
Setting—General practice.
Participants—34 clinicians from two London primary care groups (Fulham and Hammersmith).
Main outcome measures—Number and origin of questions; process and time involved in producing summaries; satisfaction with the service.
Results—All 100 clinicians in two primary care groups were approached. Thirty four agreed to participate, of whom 22 asked 60 questions over 10 months. Participants were highly satisfied with the summaries they received. For one third of questions the clinicians stated they would change practice in the index patient, and for 55% the participants stated they would change practice in other patients. Answering questions thoroughly was time consuming (median 130 minutes). The median turnaround time was 9 days; 82% of questions were answered within the timeframe specified by the questioner. Without the informaticist, one third of questions would not have been pursued.
Conclusion—The clinical informaticist service increased access to evidence for busy clinicians. Satisfaction was high among users and clinicians stated that changes in practice would occur. However, uptake of the service was lower than expected (22% of those offered the service). Further research is needed into how this method of increasing access to evidence compares with other strategies, and whether it results in improved health outcomes for patients.
Key Words: clinical informaticist; evidence-based medicine; information services
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (163.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barrie A. R., Ward A. M. Questioning behaviour in general practice: a pragmatic study. BMJ. 1997 Dec 6;315(7121):1512–1515. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7121.1512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brassey J., Elwyn G., Price C., Kinnersley P. Just in time information for clinicians: a questionnaire evaluation of the ATTRACT project. BMJ. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):529–530. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chambliss M. L., Conley J. Answering clinical questions. J Fam Pract. 1996 Aug;43(2):140–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clarke J., Wentz R. Pragmatic approach is effective in evidence based health care. BMJ. 2000 Sep 2;321(7260):566–567. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Covell D. G., Uman G. C., Manning P. R. Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med. 1985 Oct;103(4):596–599. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-4-596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davidoff F., Florance V. The informationist: a new health profession? Ann Intern Med. 2000 Jun 20;132(12):996–998. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-12-200006200-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ely J. W., Osheroff J. A., Ebell M. H., Bergus G. R., Levy B. T., Chambliss M. L., Evans E. R. Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care. BMJ. 1999 Aug 7;319(7206):358–361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7206.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fahey T. Applying the results of clinical trials to patients to general practice: perceived problems, strengths, assumptions, and challenges for the future. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Apr;48(429):1173–1178. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gorman P. N., Helfand M. Information seeking in primary care: how physicians choose which clinical questions to pursue and which to leave unanswered. Med Decis Making. 1995 Apr-Jun;15(2):113–119. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guyatt G. H., Meade M. O., Jaeschke R. Z., Cook D. J., Haynes R. B. Practitioners of evidence based care. Not all clinicians need to appraise evidence from scratch but all need some skills. BMJ. 2000 Apr 8;320(7240):954–955. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7240.954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayward J. A., Wearne S. M., Middleton P. F., Silagy C. A., Weller D. P., Doust J. A. Providing evidence-based answers to clinical questions. A pilot information service for general practitioners. Med J Aust. 1999 Nov 15;171(10):547–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McColl A., Smith H., White P., Field J. General practitioner's perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1998 Jan 31;316(7128):361–365. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7128.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osheroff J. A., Forsythe D. E., Buchanan B. G., Bankowitz R. A., Blumenfeld B. H., Miller R. A. Physicians' information needs: analysis of questions posed during clinical teaching. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Apr 1;114(7):576–581. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-7-576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prescott K., Lloyd M., Douglas H. R., Haines A., Humphrey C., Rosenthal J., Watt I. Promoting clinically effective practice: general practitioners' awareness of sources of research evidence. Fam Pract. 1997 Aug;14(4):320–323. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.4.320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swinglehurst D. A., Pierce M. Questioning in general practice--a tool for change. Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Sep;50(458):747–750. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wood F., Palmer J., Ellis D., Simpson S., Bacigalupo R. Information in primary health care. Health Libr Rev. 1995 Dec;12(4):295–308. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2532.1995.1240295.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]