Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 2000 Dec;9(4):210–215. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.4.210

Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services

S Grogan 1, M Conner 1, P Norman 1, D Willits 1, I Porter 1
PMCID: PMC1743536  PMID: 11101705

Abstract

M Conner, senior lecturer

P Norman, senior lecturer

D Willits, general practitioner

I Porter, research and development head

Background—In order that patient satisfaction may be assessed in a meaningful way, measures that are valid and reliable are required. This study was undertaken to assess the construct validity and internal reliability of the previously developed Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ).

Method—A total of 1390 patients from five practices in the North of England, the Midlands, and Scotland completed the questionnaire. Responses were checked for construct validity (including confirmatory factor analysis to check the factor structure of the scale) and internal reliability.

Results—Confirmatory factor analysis showed that items loaded on the appropriate factors in a five factor model (doctors, nurses, access, appointments, and facilities). Scores on the specific subscales showed highly significant positive correlations with general satisfaction subscale scores suggesting construct validity. Also, the prediction (derived from past research) that older people would be more satisfied with the service was borne out by the results (F (4, 1312) = 57.10; p<0.0001), providing further construct validation. The five specific subscales (doctors, nurses, access, appointments, and facilities), the general satisfaction subscale, and the questionnaire as a whole were found to have high internal reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.74–0.95).

Conclusion—The results suggest that the PSQ is a valid and internally reliable tool for assessing patient satisfaction with general practitioner services.

(Quality in Health Care 2000;9:210–215)

Key Words: patient satisfaction; general practitioner services; questionnaire construction; construct validity; reliability

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (157.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avis M., Bond M., Arthur A. Satisfying solutions? A review of some unresolved issues in the measurement of patient satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 1995 Aug;22(2):316–322. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22020316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker R. Development of a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction with consultations in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Dec;40(341):487–490. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker R., Preston C., Cheater F., Hearnshaw H. Measuring patients' attitudes to care across the primary/secondary interface: the development of the patient career diary. Qual Health Care. 1999 Sep;8(3):154–160. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.3.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker R., Streatfield J. What type of general practice do patients prefer? Exploration of practice characteristics influencing patient satisfaction. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Dec;45(401):654–659. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker R. The reliability and criterion validity of a measure of patients' satisfaction with their general practice. Fam Pract. 1991 Jun;8(2):171–177. doi: 10.1093/fampra/8.2.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grogan S., Conner M., Willits D., Norman P. Development of a questionnaire to measure patients' satisfaction with general practitioners' services. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Oct;45(399):525–529. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harris L. E., Swindle R. W., Mungai S. M., Weinberger M., Tierney W. M. Measuring patient satisfaction for quality improvement. Med Care. 1999 Dec;37(12):1207–1213. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199912000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kinnersley P., Anderson E., Parry K., Clement J., Archard L., Turton P., Stainthorpe A., Fraser A., Butler C. C., Rogers C. Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting "same day" consultations in primary care. BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1043–1048. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Loblaw D. A., Bezjak A., Bunston T. Development and testing of a visit-specific patient satisfaction questionnaire: the Princess Margaret Hospital Satisfaction With Doctor Questionnaire. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jun;17(6):1931–1938. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Paddock L. E., Veloski J., Chatterton M. L., Gevirtz F. O., Nash D. B. Development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction with diabetes disease management. Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul;23(7):951–956. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sitzia J., Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Dec;45(12):1829–1843. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00128-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Trout A., Magnusson A. R., Hedges J. R. Patient satisfaction investigations and the emergency department: what does the literature say? Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Jun;7(6):695–709. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02050.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Woodward C. A., Ostbye T., Craighead J., Gold G., Wenghofer E. F. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care in independent health facilities: developing and assessing a tool to enhance public accountability. Am J Med Qual. 2000 May-Jun;15(3):94–105. doi: 10.1177/106286060001500303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES