Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 2000 Dec;9(4):203–209. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.4.203

Voluntary reporting system in anaesthesia: is there a link between undesirable and critical events?

P Boelle 1, P Garnerin 1, F Clergue 1, J Sicard 1, F Bonnet 1
PMCID: PMC1743544  PMID: 11101704

Abstract

P Garnerin, quality manager and F Clergue, department head and professor

J-F Sicard, anaesthetist and F Bonnet, department head and professor

Background—Reporting systems in anaesthesia have generally focused on critical events (including death) to trigger investigations of latent and active errors. The decrease in the rate of these critical events calls for a broader definition of significant anaesthetic events, such as hypotension and bradycardia, to monitor anaesthetic care. The association between merely undesirable events and critical events has not been established and needs to be investigated by voluntary reporting systems.

Objectives—To establish whether undesirable anaesthetic events are correlated with critical events in anaesthetic voluntary reporting systems.

Methods—As part of a quality improvement project, a systematic reporting system was implemented for monitoring 32 events during elective surgery in our hospital in 1996. The events were classified according to severity (critical/undesirable) and nature (process/outcome) and control charts and logistic regression were used to analyse the data.

Results—During a period of 30 months 22% of the 6439 procedures were associated with anaesthetic events, 15% of which were critical and 31% process related. A strong association was found between critical outcome events and critical process events (OR 11.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.4 to 27.8)), undesirable outcome events (OR 4.8 (95% CI 2.0 to 11.8)), and undesirable process events (OR 4.8 (95% CI 1.3 to 13.4)). For other classes of events, risk factors were related to the course of anaesthesia (duration, occurrence of other events) and included factors determined during the pre-anaesthetic visit (risk of haemorrhage, difficult intubation or allergic reaction).

Conclusion—Undesirable events are associated with more severe events and with pre-anaesthetic risk factors. The way in which information on significant events can be used is discussed, including better use of preoperative information, reduction in the collection of redundant information, and more structured reporting.

(Quality in Health Care 2000;9:203–209)

Key Words: reporting system; correlation analysis; quality assessment; adverse events; anaesthesia

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (145.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blumenthal D. Making medical errors into "medical treasures''. JAMA. 1994 Dec 21;272(23):1867–1868. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boëlle P. Y., Garnerin P., Valleron A. J. A sequential procedure to test the progressive decrease of rare adverse events. Comput Biol Med. 1996 Nov;26(6):513–523. doi: 10.1016/s0010-4825(96)00032-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen M. M., Duncan P. G., Pope W. D., Biehl D., Tweed W. A., MacWilliam L., Merchant R. N. The Canadian four-centre study of anaesthetic outcomes: II. Can outcomes be used to assess the quality of anaesthesia care? Can J Anaesth. 1992 May;39(5 Pt 1):430–439. doi: 10.1007/BF03008706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooper J. B. Is voluntary reporting of critical events effective for quality assurance? Anesthesiology. 1996 Nov;85(5):961–964. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199611000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cooper J. B., Newbower R. S., Kitz R. J. An analysis of major errors and equipment failures in anesthesia management: considerations for prevention and detection. Anesthesiology. 1984 Jan;60(1):34–42. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198401000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fasting S., Gisvold S. E. Data recording of problems during anaesthesia: presentation of a well-functioning and simple system. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996 Nov;40(10):1173–1183. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1996.tb05547.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hawkins J. L., Koonin L. M., Palmer S. K., Gibbs C. P. Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979-1990. Anesthesiology. 1997 Feb;86(2):277–284. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199702000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jayasuriya J. P., Anandaciva S. Compliance with an incident report scheme in anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1995 Oct;50(10):846–849. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05848.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lagasse R. S., Steinberg E. S., Katz R. I., Saubermann A. J. Defining quality of perioperative care by statistical process control of adverse outcomes. Anesthesiology. 1995 May;82(5):1181–1188. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199505000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mallampati S. R., Gatt S. P., Gugino L. D., Desai S. P., Waraksa B., Freiberger D., Liu P. L. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985 Jul;32(4):429–434. doi: 10.1007/BF03011357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. O'Connor G. T. Every system is designed to get the results it gets. BMJ. 1997 Oct 11;315(7113):897–898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7113.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sanborn K. V., Castro J., Kuroda M., Thys D. M. Detection of intraoperative incidents by electronic scanning of computerized anesthesia records. Comparison with voluntary reporting. Anesthesiology. 1996 Nov;85(5):977–987. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199611000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Short T. G., O'Regan A., Lew J., Oh T. E. Critical incident reporting in an anaesthetic department quality assurance programme. Anaesthesia. 1993 Jan;48(1):3–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb06781.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Warden J. C., Borton C. L., Horan B. F. Mortality associated with anaesthesia in New South Wales, 1984-1990. Med J Aust. 1994 Nov 21;161(10):585–593. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1994.tb127636.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Webb R. K., Currie M., Morgan C. A., Williamson J. A., Mackay P., Russell W. J., Runciman W. B. The Australian Incident Monitoring Study: an analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993 Oct;21(5):520–528. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9302100507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilson M. E., Spiegelhalter D., Robertson J. A., Lesser P. Predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1988 Aug;61(2):211–216. doi: 10.1093/bja/61.2.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yamamoto K., Tsubokawa T., Shibata K., Ohmura S., Nitta S., Kobayashi T. Predicting difficult intubation with indirect laryngoscopy. Anesthesiology. 1997 Feb;86(2):316–321. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199702000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES