Skip to main content
PMC home page
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2002 Mar;11(1):9–14. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.1.9

Implementing clinical governance in English primary care groups/trusts: reconciling quality improvement and quality assurance

S Campbell 1, R Sheaff 1, B Sibbald 1, M Marshall 1, S Pickard 1, L Gask 1, S Halliwell 1, A Rogers 1, M Roland 1
PMCID: PMC1743564  PMID: 12078380

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the concept of clinical governance being advocated by primary care groups/trusts (PCG/Ts), approaches being used to implement clinical governance, and potential barriers to its successful implementation in primary care.

Design: Qualitative case studies using semi-structured interviews and documentation review.

Setting: Twelve purposively sampled PCG/Ts in England.

Participants: Fifty senior staff including chief executives, clinical governance leads, mental health leads, and lay board members.

Main outcome measures: Participants' perceptions of the role of clinical governance in PCG/Ts.

Results: PCG/Ts recognise that the successful implementation of clinical governance in general practice will require cultural as well as organisational changes, and the support of practices. They are focusing their energies on supporting practices and getting them involved in quality improvement activities. These activities include, but move beyond, conventional approaches to quality assessment (audit, incentives) to incorporate approaches which emphasise corporate and shared learning. PCG/Ts are also engaged in setting up systems for monitoring quality and for dealing with poor performance. Barriers include structural barriers (weak contractual levers to influence general practices), resource barriers (perceived lack of staff or money), and cultural barriers (suspicion by practice staff or problems overcoming the perceived blame culture associated with quality assessment).

Conclusion: PCG/Ts are focusing on setting up systems for implementing clinical governance which seek to emphasise developmental and supportive approaches which will engage health professionals. Progress is intentionally incremental but formidable challenges lie ahead, not least reconciling the dual role of supporting practices while monitoring (and dealing with poor) performance.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (99.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allery L. A., Owen P. A., Robling M. R. Why general practitioners and consultants change their clinical practice: a critical incident study. BMJ. 1997 Mar 22;314(7084):870–874. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7084.870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berwick D. M. A primer on leading the improvement of systems. BMJ. 1996 Mar 9;312(7031):619–622. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7031.619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blumenthal D., Kilo C. M. A report card on continuous quality improvement. Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):625-48, 511. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buetow S. A., Roland M. Clinical governance: bridging the gap between managerial and clinical approaches to quality of care. Qual Health Care. 1999 Sep;8(3):184–190. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.3.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell S., Roland M., Wilkin D. Primary care groups: Improving the quality of care through clinical governance. BMJ. 2001 Jun 30;322(7302):1580–1582. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7302.1580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cantillon P., Jones R. Does continuing medical education in general practice make a difference? BMJ. 1999 May 8;318(7193):1276–1279. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davies H. T., Nutley S. M. Developing learning organisations in the new NHS. BMJ. 2000 Apr 8;320(7240):998–1001. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7240.998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Leape L. L., Berwick D. M. Safe health care: are we up to it? BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):725–726. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Moss F., Garside P., Dawson S. Organisational change: the key to quality improvement. Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec;7 (Suppl):S1–S2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moss F., Palmberg M., Plsek P., Schellekens W. Quality improvement around the world: how much we can learn from each other. Qual Health Care. 2000 Mar;9(1):63–66. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.1.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schuster M. A., McGlynn E. A., Brook R. H. How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):517-63, 509. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Seddon M. E., Marshall M. N., Campbell S. M., Roland M. O. Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10(3):152–158. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100152... [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sheldon T. A. It ain't what you do but the way that you do it. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2001 Jan;6(1):3–5. doi: 10.1258/1355819011927125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shortell S. M., Bennett C. L., Byck G. R. Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress. Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):593-624, 510. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shortell S. M., Jones R. H., Rademaker A. W., Gillies R. R., Dranove D. S., Hughes E. F., Budetti P. P., Reynolds K. S., Huang C. F. Assessing the impact of total quality management and organizational culture on multiple outcomes of care for coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. Med Care. 2000 Feb;38(2):207–217. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200002000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith L. F., Harris D. Clinical governance--a new label for old ingredients: quality or quantity? Br J Gen Pract. 1999 May;49(442):339–340. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Thomson R. Quality to the fore in health policy--at last. But the NHS mustn't encourage quality improvement with punitive approaches. BMJ. 1998 Jul 11;317(7151):95–96. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7151.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weingart S. N., Wilson R. M., Gibberd R. W., Harrison B. Epidemiology of medical error. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):774–777. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES