Skip to main content
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2002 Mar;11(1):19–24. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.1.19

Implementing a new drug record system: a qualitative study of difficulties perceived by physicians and nurses

S Andersen 1
PMCID: PMC1743569  PMID: 12078363

Abstract

Objectives: To identify organisational difficulties faced by physicians and nurses when using drug prescribing sheets for recording both drug prescriptions and drug administration.

Design: Qualitative interview study.

Setting: Two general internal medicine wards.

Participants: Seven physicians and eight nurses.

Main outcome measures: Difficulties explicitly identified by the participants during the interviews.

Results: The implementation of procedures conflicted with existing structure, culture, and routines. Insufficient competence within the system to use the drug prescribing sheets created resistance and made people down the line create their own interpretations and solutions to the problems they faced. A total of nine problems were identified: (1) insufficient knowledge and uncertainty about procedures, (2) ignorance of sources of error, (3) unclear responsibilities, (4) low community spirit, (5) insufficient communication, (6) clinician autonomy and low acceptance of change, (7) strong professional identity, (8) low priority task, and (9) logistical problems.

Conclusions: Unawareness of procedures, insufficient dissemination of knowledge, and insufficient cooperation and scepticism among those who put drug handling into practice is likely to have an impact on the quality of health care. The identification of these obstacles may help managers to improve the quality of the drug handling process on internal medicine wards and make it possible to select a framework for changing the clinical behaviour of doctors and nurses.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (150.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen S. E., Fog D. Skriftlig dokumentation af medicinordinationer. Overensstemmelse imellem laegejournal og Medicinkardex. Ugeskr Laeger. 1998 Jun 29;160(27):4059–4062. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barr D. A. The effects of organizational structure on primary care outcomes under managed care. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Mar 1;122(5):353–359. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-5-199503010-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates D. W., Cullen D. J., Laird N., Petersen L. A., Small S. D., Servi D., Laffel G., Sweitzer B. J., Shea B. F., Hallisey R. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995 Jul 5;274(1):29–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates D. W. Medication errors. How common are they and what can be done to prevent them? Drug Saf. 1996 Nov;15(5):303–310. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199615050-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergman U., Norlin A., Wiholm B. E. Inadequacies in hospital drug handling. Acta Med Scand. 1979;205(1-2):79–85. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1979.tb06007.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CROOKS J., CLARK C. G., CAIE H. B., MAWSON W. B. PRESCRIBING AND ADMINISTRATION OF DRUGS IN HOSPITAL. Lancet. 1965 Feb 13;1(7381):373–378. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(65)91800-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crooks J., Weir R. D., Coull D. C., McNab J. W., Calder G., Barnett J. W., Caie H. B. Evaluation of a method of prescribing drugs in hospital, and a new method of recording their administration. Lancet. 1967 Mar 25;1(7491):668–671. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)92557-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies H. T., Nutley S. M. Developing learning organisations in the new NHS. BMJ. 2000 Apr 8;320(7240):998–1001. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7240.998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies H. T., Nutley S. M., Mannion R. Organisational culture and quality of health care. Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;9(2):111–119. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.2.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Donaldson L. J., Gray J. A. Clinical governance: a quality duty for health organisations. Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec;7 (Suppl):S37–S44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fitzpatrick R., Boulton M. Qualitative methods for assessing health care. Qual Health Care. 1994 Jun;3(2):107–113. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.2.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Garside P. Organisational context for quality: lessons from the fields of organisational development and change management. Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec;7 (Suppl):S8–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grol R. Personal paper. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ. 1997 Aug 16;315(7105):418–421. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7105.418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Haines A., Donald A. Making better use of research findings. BMJ. 1998 Jul 4;317(7150):72–75. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7150.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hill P. A., Wigmore H. M. Measurement and control of drug-administration incidents. Lancet. 1967 Mar 25;1(7491):671–674. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)92558-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Håberg M. Kvalitetssikring i sykehus. Evaluering av gammelt og nytt ordineringssystem ved Sentralsjukehuset i Rogaland høsten 1990/våren 1991 og 1992. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1992 Aug 10;112(18):2378–2382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Koeck C. Time for organisational development in healthcare organisations. Improving quality for patients means changing the organisation. BMJ. 1998 Nov 7;317(7168):1267–1268. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Leape L. L., Bates D. W., Cullen D. J., Cooper J., Demonaco H. J., Gallivan T., Hallisey R., Ives J., Laird N., Laffel G. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995 Jul 5;274(1):35–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Leape L. L. Error in medicine. JAMA. 1994 Dec 21;272(23):1851–1857. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Malterud K. Shared understanding of the qualitative research process. Guidelines for the medical researcher. Fam Pract. 1993 Jun;10(2):201–206. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.2.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Oxman A. D., Thomson M. A., Davis D. A., Haynes R. B. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ. 1995 Nov 15;153(10):1423–1431. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Patton M. Q. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1189–1208. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pope C., Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):42–45. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Robertson N., Baker R., Hearnshaw H. Changing the clinical behavior of doctors: a psychological framework. Qual Health Care. 1996 Mar;5(1):51–54. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sanner J. Konflikt mellan läkare och sköterskor om läkemedelslistor. Var god stör ej--läkemedelsdokumentation pågår. Lakartidningen. 1998 Jun 3;95(23):2728–2732. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schousboe L. P., Tandrup O. Ordentlige medicinoptegnelser. Ugeskr Laeger. 1999 Aug 2;161(31):4389–4392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schulz R., Schulz C. Management practices, physician autonomy, and satisfaction. Evidence from mental health institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany. Med Care. 1988 Aug;26(8):750–763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Senderovitz T., Christophersen A. B., Christensen H. R., Kampmann J. P. Uoverensstemmelse mellem journal og medicinkardex på to store afdelinger i København. Ugeskr Laeger. 1998 Jun 29;160(27):4055–4058. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Siple J. F., Joseph C. L. Medication discrepancies on admission to a nursing home. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992 Feb;49(2):397–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Watt J. A., Dorricott N., Stewart R. A., Daw D. P. Methods of recording prescriptions in hospital and their effects on transcribed drug lists. Br J Psychiatry. 1973 Jan;122(566):65–70. doi: 10.1192/bjp.122.1.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Weingart S. N., Wilson R. M., Gibberd R. W., Harrison B. Epidemiology of medical error. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):774–777. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Weitzman E. A. Analyzing qualitative data with computer software. Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1241–1263. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wyatt J. C., Wright P. Design should help use of patients' data. Lancet. 1998 Oct 24;352(9137):1375–1378. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08306-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES