Abstract
Background: Learning from mistakes is key to maintaining and improving the quality of care in the NHS. This study investigates the willingness of healthcare professionals to report the mistakes of others.
Methods: The questionnaire used in this research included nine short scenarios describing either a violation of a protocol, compliance with a protocol, or improvisation (where no protocol exists). By developing different versions of the questionnaire, each scenario was presented with a good, poor, or bad outcome for the patient. The participants (n=315) were doctors, nurses, and midwives from three English NHS trusts who volunteered to take part in the study and represented 53% of those originally contacted. Participants were asked to indicate how likely they were to report the incident described in each scenario to a senior member of staff.
Results: The findings of this study suggest that healthcare professionals, particularly doctors, are reluctant to report adverse events to a superior. The results show that healthcare professionals, as might be expected, are most likely to report an incident to a colleague when things go wrong (F(2,520) = 82.01, p<0.001). The reporting of incidents to a senior member of staff is also more likely, irrespective of outcome for the patient, when the incident involves the violation of a protocol (F(2,520) = 198.77, p<0.001. It appears that, although the reporting of an incident to a senior member of staff is generally not very likely, particularly among doctors, it is most likely when the incident represents the violation of a protocol with a bad outcome.
Conclusions: An alternative means of organisational learning that relies on the identification of system (latent) failures before, rather than after, an adverse event is proposed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (100.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barach P., Small S. D. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):759–763. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grol R. National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Sep;40(338):361–364. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawton R., Parker D. Procedures and the professional: the case of the British NHS. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Feb;48(3):353–361. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00345-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang B. A. Error in medicine: legal impediments to U.S. reform. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1999 Feb;24(1):27–58. doi: 10.1215/03616878-24-1-27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stanhope N., Crowley-Murphy M., Vincent C., O'Connor A. M., Taylor-Adams S. E. An evaluation of adverse incident reporting. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Feb;5(1):5–12. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00146.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tunis S. R., Hayward R. S., Wilson M. C., Rubin H. R., Bass E. B., Johnston M., Steinberg E. P. Internists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jun 1;120(11):956–963. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-11-199406010-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vincent C., Taylor-Adams S., Stanhope N. Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. BMJ. 1998 Apr 11;316(7138):1154–1157. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7138.1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walker S. B., Lowe M. J. Nurses' views on reporting medication incidents. Int J Nurs Pract. 1998 Jun;4(2):97–102. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-172x.1998.00058.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weingart S. N., Ship A. N., Aronson M. D. Confidential clinician-reported surveillance of adverse events among medical inpatients. J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Jul;15(7):470–477. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.06269.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]