Skip to main content
PMC home page
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2002 Jun;11(2):131–136. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.131

Patients' Evaluation of the Quality of Diabetes Care (PEQD): development and validation of a new instrument

F Pouwer, F Snoek
PMCID: PMC1743604  PMID: 12448804

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a brief measure of patients' evaluation of the quality of diabetes care and to study predictors of consumers' rating of the quality of diabetes care.

Design: A prospective design.

Subjects: 176 adults with type 1 (39%) or type 2 (61%) diabetes.

Main measures: Demographic variables, HbA1c, number of diabetes complications, satisfaction with diabetes care, diabetes related distress, and fear of hypoglycaemia were assessed by self-report. In addition, satisfaction with diabetes care and evaluations about quality of the care were measured at 16 month follow up. Statistical analysis comprised principal component analyses, Cronbach's alpha, t tests, Pearson's correlation, and linear regression analyses.

Results: Results in the literature were used to develop the 14 items of the Patients' Evaluation of the Quality of Diabetes Care (PEQD) scale, assessing the most important aspects of the quality of diabetes care as delivered by the specialist in internal medicine (internist) and the diabetes nurse specialist (DNS). Two principal components analyses (internist/DNS) both yielded one 14 item factor with a high internal consistency. Satisfaction with diabetes care, fewer diabetes related complications, fewer treatment related problems, and a low level of worries about hypoglycaemia were predictors of a more positive evaluation of diabetes care delivered by the internist. Sociodemographic variables were not related to the patients' evaluations of the quality of diabetes care.

Conclusions: The PEQD comprises different aspects of quality of diabetes care and can be regarded as a suitable instrument for evaluating patients' judgements about the quality of their care.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (113.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Casparie A. F., van der Waal M. A. Differences in preferences between diabetic patients and diabetologists regarding quality of care: a matter of continuity and efficiency of care? Diabet Med. 1995 Sep;12(9):828–832. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb02087.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cleary P. D., Edgman-Levitan S. Health care quality. Incorporating consumer perspectives. JAMA. 1997 Nov 19;278(19):1608–1612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cox D. J., Irvine A., Gonder-Frederick L., Nowacek G., Butterfield J. Fear of hypoglycemia: quantification, validation, and utilization. Diabetes Care. 1987 Sep-Oct;10(5):617–621. doi: 10.2337/diacare.10.5.617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deckert T., Poulsen J. E., Larsen M. Prognosis of diabetics with diabetes onset before the age of thirty-one. II. Factors influencing the prognosis. Diabetologia. 1978 Jun;14(6):371–377. doi: 10.1007/BF01228131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hall J. A., Dornan M. C. Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(7):811–818. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90205-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hall J. A., Dornan M. C. What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(9):935–939. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90284-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hammersley M. S., Holland M. R., Walford S., Thorn P. A. What happens to defaulters from a diabetic clinic? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Nov 9;291(6505):1330–1332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6505.1330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jacobson A. M., Adler A. G., Derby L., Anderson B. J., Wolfsdorf J. I. Clinic attendance and glycemic control. Study of contrasting groups of patients with IDDM. Diabetes Care. 1991 Jul;14(7):599–601. doi: 10.2337/diacare.14.7.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kinmonth A. L., Murphy E., Marteau T. Diabetes and its care--what do patients expect? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Aug;39(325):324–327. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lewis J. R. Patient views on quality care in general practice: literature review. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Sep;39(5):655–670. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pouwer F., Snoek F. J., van der Ploeg H. M., Adèr H. J., Heine R. J. Monitoring of psychological well-being in outpatients with diabetes: effects on mood, HbA(1c), and the patient's evaluation of the quality of diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2001 Nov;24(11):1929–1935. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.11.1929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pouwer F., Snoek F. J., van der Ploeg H. M., Adèr H. J., Heine R. J. The well-being questionnaire: evidence for a three-factor structure with 12 items (W-BQ12). Psychol Med. 2000 Mar;30(2):455–462. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700001719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pouwer F., Snoek F. J., van der Ploeg H. M., Heine R. J., Brand A. N. A comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Well-being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Qual Life Res. 1998 Jan;7(1):33–38. doi: 10.1023/a:1008832821181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pouwer F., van der Ploeg H. M., Adèr H. J., Heine R. J., Snoek F. J. The 12-item well-being questionnaire. An evaluation of its validity and reliability in Dutch people with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999 Dec;22(12):2004–2010. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.12.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Snoek F. J., Pouwer F., Welch G. W., Polonsky W. H. Diabetes-related emotional distress in Dutch and U.S. diabetic patients: cross-cultural validity of the problem areas in diabetes scale. Diabetes Care. 2000 Sep;23(9):1305–1309. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vuori H. Patient satisfaction--does it matter? Qual Assur Health Care. 1991;3(3):183–189. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/3.3.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ware J. E., Jr, Hays R. D. Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. Med Care. 1988 Apr;26(4):393–402. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198804000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Welch G. W., Jacobson A. M., Polonsky W. H. The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. An evaluation of its clinical utility. Diabetes Care. 1997 May;20(5):760–766. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.5.760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wensing M., Grol R., Asberg J., van Montfort P., van Weel C., Felling A. Does the health status of chronically ill patients predict their judgements of the quality of general practice care? Qual Life Res. 1997 May;6(4):293–299. doi: 10.1023/a:1018405207552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? Soc Sci Med. 1994 Feb;38(4):509–516. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90247-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES