Skip to main content
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2002 Sep;11(3):224–229. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.3.224

Setting priorities for patient safety

W Runciman 1, M Edmonds 1, M Pradhan 1
PMCID: PMC1743639  PMID: 12486985

Abstract

Background: Current "flags" for adverse events (AEs) are biased towards those with serious outcomes, potentially leading to failure to address mundane common problems.

Aim: To provide a basis for setting priorities to improve patient safety by ranking adverse events by resource consumption as well as by outcome. This was done by classifying a set of AEs, according to how they may be prevented, into "Principal Natural Categories" (PNCs).

Setting: AEs associated with a representative sample of admissions to Australian acute care hospitals.

Design: AEs were classified into PNCs which were ranked by overall frequency, an index of resource consumption (a function of mean extended hospital stay and the number of cases in each PNC), and severity of outcome.

Results: The 1712 AEs analysed fell into 581 PNCs; only 28% had more than two cases. Most resource use (60%) was by AEs which led to minor disabilities, 36% was by those which led to major disabilities, and 4% by those associated with death. Most of the events with serious outcomes fell into fewer than 50 PNCs; only seven of these PNCs had more than six cases resulting in serious outcomes.

Conclusions: If interventions for AEs are triggered only by serious outcomes by, for example, using recommended risk scoring methods, most problems would not be addressed, particularly the large number of mundane problems which consume the majority of resources. Both serious and mundane problems should be addressed. Most types of events occur too infrequently to be characterised at a hospital level and require large scale (preferably national) collections of incidents and events.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (163.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bagian J. P., Lee C., Gosbee J., DeRosier J., Stalhandske E., Eldridge N., Williams R., Burkhardt M. Developing and deploying a patient safety program in a large health care delivery system: you can't fix what you don't know about. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Oct;27(10):522–532. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27046-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates D. W., Spell N., Cullen D. J., Burdick E., Laird N., Petersen L. A., Small S. D., Sweitzer B. J., Leape L. L. The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1997 Jan 22;277(4):307–311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Leape L. L., Brennan T. A., Laird N., Lawthers A. G., Localio A. R., Barnes B. A., Hebert L., Newhouse J. P., Weiler P. C., Hiatt H. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 7;324(6):377–384. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102073240605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rigby K., Clark R. B., Runciman W. B. Adverse events in health care: setting priorities based on economic evaluation. J Qual Clin Pract. 1999 Mar;19(1):7–12. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00301.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Runciman W. B., Helps S. C., Sexton E. J., Malpass A. A classification for incidents and accidents in the health-care system. J Qual Clin Pract. 1998 Sep;18(3):199–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Runciman W. B. Lessons from the Australian Patient Safety Foundation: setting up a national patient safety surveillance system--is this the right model? Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep;11(3):246–251. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.3.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Runciman W. B., Webb R. K., Helps S. C., Thomas E. J., Sexton E. J., Studdert D. M., Brennan T. A. A comparison of iatrogenic injury studies in Australia and the USA. II: Reviewer behaviour and quality of care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Oct;12(5):379–388. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/12.5.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Thomas E. J., Studdert D. M., Newhouse J. P., Zbar B. I., Howard K. M., Williams E. J., Brennan T. A. Costs of medical injuries in Utah and Colorado. Inquiry. 1999 Fall;36(3):255–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vincent C. A. Research into medical accidents: a case of negligence? BMJ. 1989 Nov 4;299(6708):1150–1153. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6708.1150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wilson R. M., Runciman W. B., Gibberd R. W., Harrison B. T., Newby L., Hamilton J. D. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust. 1995 Nov 6;163(9):458–471. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1995.tb124691.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Web-only Table]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES