Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2003 Oct;12(5):330–336. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.5.330

Medical school attended as a predictor of medical malpractice claims

T Waters 1, F Lefevre 1, P Budetti 1
PMCID: PMC1743759  PMID: 14532363

Abstract

Objectives: Following earlier research which showed that certain types of physicians are more likely to be sued for malpractice, this study explored (1) whether graduates of certain medical schools have consistently higher rates of lawsuits against them, (2) if the rates of lawsuits against physicians are associated with their school of graduation, and (3) whether the characteristics of the medical school explain any differences found.

Design: Retrospective analysis of malpractice claims data from three states merged with physician data from the AMA Masterfile (n=30 288).

Study subjects: All US medical schools with at least 5% of graduates practising in three study states (n=89).

Main outcome measures: Proportion of graduates from a medical school for a particular decade sued for medical malpractice between 1990 and 1997 and odds ratio for lawsuits against physicians from high and low outlier schools; correlations between the lawsuit rates of successive cohorts of graduates of specific medical schools.

Results: Medical schools that are outliers for malpractice lawsuits against their graduates in one decade are likely to retain their outlier status in the subsequent decade. In addition, outlier status of a physician's medical school in the decade before his or her graduation is predictive of that physician's malpractice claims experience (p<0.01). All correlations of cohorts were relatively high and all were statistically significant at p<0.001. Comparison of outlier and non-outlier schools showed that some differences exist in school ownership (p<0.05), years since established (p<0.05), and mean number of residents and fellows (p<0.01).

Conclusions: Consistent differences in malpractice experience exist among medical schools. Further research exploring alternative explanations for these differences needs to be conducted.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (167.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernat E. Liability risks in gynaecology and obstetrics under German and Austrian law. Med Law. 1995;14(5-6):413–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bosch X. Patients' group to publish names of negligent doctors. BMJ. 2000 Sep 9;321(7261):587A–587A. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caplan L. R. Stroke treatment: promising but still struggling. JAMA. 1998 Apr 22;279(16):1304–1306. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.16.1304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caplan R. A., Vistica M. F., Posner K. L., Cheney F. W. Adverse anesthetic outcomes arising from gas delivery equipment: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 1997 Oct;87(4):741–748. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199710000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coyte P. C., Dewees D. N., Trebilcock M. J. Canadian medical malpractice liability: an empirical analysis of recent trends. J Health Econ. 1991 Jul;10(2):143–168. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(91)90002-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fileni A., Magnavita N. Denunce di responsabilità civile contro i radiologi. Analisi del quinquennio 1993-1997. Radiol Med. 1998 May;95(5):506–510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gild W. M. Risk management in cardiac anesthesia: the ASA Closed Claims Project perspective. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1994 Feb;8(1 Suppl 1):3–6. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(94)90608-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hickson G. B., Clayton E. W., Githens P. B., Sloan F. A. Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following perinatal injuries. JAMA. 1992 Mar 11;267(10):1359–1363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Israeli A., Altholz J. An international practitioner data bank as a quality tool. Int J Qual Health Care. 1997 Oct;9(5):323–325. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/9.5.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kmietowicz Z. International charity offers health as well as loans. BMJ. 2000 Sep 9;321(7261):592–592. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7261.592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kumar P., Basu D. Substance abuse by medical students and doctors. J Indian Med Assoc. 2000 Aug;98(8):447–452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lefevre F. V., Waters T. M., Budetti P. P. A survey of physician training programs in risk management and communication skills for malpractice prevention. J Law Med Ethics. 2000 Fall;28(3):258–266. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00669.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Localio A. R., Lawthers A. G., Brennan T. A., Laird N. M., Hebert L. E., Peterson L. M., Newhouse J. P., Weiler P. C., Hiatt H. H. Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jul 25;325(4):245–251. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199107253250405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nakajima K., Keyes C., Kuroyanagi T., Tatara K. Medical malpractice and legal resolution systems in Japan. JAMA. 2001 Mar 28;285(12):1632–1640. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.12.1632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Novack D. H., Volk G., Drossman D. A., Lipkin M., Jr Medical interviewing and interpersonal skills teaching in US medical schools. Progress, problems, and promise. JAMA. 1993 Apr 28;269(16):2101–2105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Richmond C. Cost of malpractice protection on rise in UK, too. CMAJ. 1997 Oct 1;157(7):940–941. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sauceda González L. F., Tinoco Jaramillo G., Morales Ramírez J. J. Demandas contra ginecoobstetras en la Comisión Nacional de Arbitraje Médico. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2001 Dec;69:487–491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sloan F. A., Mergenhagen P. M., Burfield W. B., Bovbjerg R. R., Hassan M. Medical malpractice experience of physicians. Predictable or haphazard? JAMA. 1989 Dec 15;262(23):3291–3297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Taragin M. I., Sonnenberg F. A., Karns M. E., Trout R., Shapiro S., Carson J. L. Does physician performance explain interspecialty differences in malpractice claim rates? Med Care. 1994 Jul;32(7):661–667. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199407000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Teres D., Lemeshow S. As American as apple pie and APACHE. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation. Crit Care Med. 1998 Aug;26(8):1297–1298. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199808000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Towse A., Danzon P. Medical negligence and the NHS: an economic analysis. Health Econ. 1999 Mar;8(2):93–101. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199903)8:2<93::aid-hec419>3.0.co;2-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilkerson L., Irby D. M. Strategies for improving teaching practices: a comprehensive approach to faculty development. Acad Med. 1998 Apr;73(4):387–396. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199804000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilson L. L., Fulton M. Risk management: how doctors, hospitals and MDOs can limit the costs of malpractice litigation. Med J Aust. 2000 Jan 17;172(2):77–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES