Skip to main content
PMC home page
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2004 Apr;13(2):121–126. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.008029

Learning from malpractice claims about negligent, adverse events in primary care in the United States

R Phillips 1, L Bartholomew 1, S Dovey 1, G Fryer 1, T Miyoshi 1, L Green 1
PMCID: PMC1743812  PMID: 15069219

Abstract

Background: The epidemiology, risks, and outcomes of errors in primary care are poorly understood. Malpractice claims brought for negligent adverse events offer a useful insight into errors in primary care.

Methods: Physician Insurers Association of America malpractice claims data (1985–2000) were analyzed for proportions of negligent claims by primary care specialty, setting, severity, health condition, and attributed cause. We also calculated risks of a claim for condition-specific negligent events relative to the prevalence of those conditions in primary care.

Results: Of 49 345 primary care claims, 26 126 (53%) were peer reviewed and 5921 (23%) were assessed as negligent; 68% of claims were for negligent events in outpatient settings. No single condition accounted for more than 5% of all negligent claims, but the underlying causes were more clustered with "diagnosis error" making up one third of claims. The ratios of condition-specific negligent event claims relative to the frequency of those conditions in primary care revealed a significantly disproportionate risk for a number of conditions (for example, appendicitis was 25 times more likely to generate a claim for negligence than breast cancer).

Conclusions: Claims data identify conditions and processes where primary health care in the United States is prone to go awry. The burden of severe outcomes and death from malpractice claims made against primary care physicians was greater in primary care outpatient settings than in hospitals. Although these data enhance information about error related negligent events in primary care, particularly when combined with other primary care data, there are many operating limitations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (230.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dovey S. M., Meyers D. S., Phillips R. L., Jr, Green L. A., Fryer G. E., Galliher J. M., Kappus J., Grob P. A preliminary taxonomy of medical errors in family practice. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep;11(3):233–238. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.3.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Elder Nancy C., Dovey Susan M. Classification of medical errors and preventable adverse events in primary care: a synthesis of the literature. J Fam Pract. 2002 Nov;51(11):927–932. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fenn Paul. Counting the cost of medical negligence. BMJ. 2002 Aug 3;325(7358):233–234. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7358.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Green L. A., Fryer G. E., Jr, Yawn B. P., Lanier D., Dovey S. M. The ecology of medical care revisited. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jun 28;344(26):2021–2025. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200106283442611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hayward R. A., Hofer T. P. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. JAMA. 2001 Jul 25;286(4):415–420. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.4.415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kravitz R. L., Rolph J. E., McGuigan K. Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool. I. Epidemiology of error in four specialties. JAMA. 1991 Oct 16;266(15):2087–2092. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Makeham Meredith A. B., Dovey Susan M., County Mary, Kidd Michael R. An international taxonomy for errors in general practice: a pilot study. Med J Aust. 2002 Jul 15;177(2):68–72. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04668.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maughan P. J. Medical negligence and the law. Br J Surg. 2001 Jul;88(7):899–900. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mechanic D., McAlpine D. D., Rosenthal M. Are patients' office visits with physicians getting shorter? N Engl J Med. 2001 Jan 18;344(3):198–204. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101183440307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meredith V., Cook C. B., Penman A. Use of the Physician Insurers Association of America database as a surveillance tool for diabetes-related malpractice claims in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 1998 Jul;21(7):1096–1100. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.7.1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):768–770. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rothschild Jeffrey M., Federico Frank A., Gandhi Tejal K., Kaushal Rainu, Williams Deborah H., Bates David W. Analysis of medication-related malpractice claims: causes, preventability, and costs. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Nov 25;162(21):2414–2420. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.21.2414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rubin G. Medical errors. Terminology of "error" is important. BMJ. 2001 Jun 9;322(7299):1422–1422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Thomas E. J., Brennan T. A. Incidence and types of preventable adverse events in elderly patients: population based review of medical records. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):741–744. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thomas E. J., Studdert D. M., Burstin H. R., Orav E. J., Zeena T., Williams E. J., Howard K. M., Weiler P. C., Brennan T. A. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care. 2000 Mar;38(3):261–271. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200003000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Toxic cascades: a comprehensive way to think about medical errors. Am Fam Physician. 2001 Mar 1;63(5):847–847. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vincent C., Young M., Phillips A. Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet. 1994 Jun 25;343(8913):1609–1613. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)93062-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vincent Charles. Understanding and responding to adverse events. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 13;348(11):1051–1056. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr020760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. WHITE K. L., WILLIAMS T. F., GREENBERG B. G. The ecology of medical care. N Engl J Med. 1961 Nov 2;265:885–892. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196111022651805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES