Abstract
Background: A series of government initatives in the UK have included strategies to improve the quality of services received by patients, including fundholding, the development of National Service Frameworks, clinical governance, and Personal Medical Services (PMS). PMS represents a new contractual arrangement between government and general practitioners (GPs) which provides new investment in return for more detailed specification of processes and outcomes of care.
Objectives: To evaluate the effects of PMS on the quality of primary mental health care between 1998 and 2001.
Design: Multiple longitudinal case studies. Semi-structured interviews with key staff within practices (GPs, nurses, practice managers) and outside (health authority and primary care group/trust managers).
Sample: Six first wave PMS sites which had specifically planned to improve their mental health care.
Results: Improvements in mental health care were found in some PMS practices and not in others. Five mechanisms associated with successful quality improvement in mental health were identified: clear goals, effective teamwork within the practice, routine use of protocols and audits, additional resources, and effective collaboration with community and secondary care. Sites where these factors were not present struggled to meet their objectives.
Conclusion: The five mechanisms which resulted in improved mental health care were facilitated by the new contractual arrangements in PMS. The new contracts were not a necessary part of these changes, but they enabled sites with an identified interest and motivation to make the changes. The contractual changes were not in themselves sufficient to improve care.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (126.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Berwick D. M. A primer on leading the improvement of systems. BMJ. 1996 Mar 9;312(7031):619–622. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7031.619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bickman L., Salzer M. S. Measuring quality in mental health services. Eval Rev. 1997 Jun;21(3):285–291. doi: 10.1177/0193841X9702100301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell S. M., Hann M., Hacker J., Burns C., Oliver D., Thapar A., Mead N., Safran D. G., Roland M. O. Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study. BMJ. 2001 Oct 6;323(7316):784–787. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7316.784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Croudace Tim, Evans Jonathan, Harrison Glynn, Sharp Deborah J., Wilkinson Ellen, McCann Gemma, Spence Mathew, Crilly Catherine, Brindle Lucy. Impact of the ICD-10 Primary Health Care (PHC) diagnostic and management guidelines for mental disorders on detection and outcome in primary care. Cluster randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;182:20–30. doi: 10.1192/bjp.182.1.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferlie E. B., Shortell S. M. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):281–315. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Firth-Cozens J. Celebrating teamwork. Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec;7 (Suppl):S3–S7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grol Richard, Grimshaw Jeremy. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003 Oct 11;362(9391):1225–1230. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kendrick T. Why can't GPs follow guidelines on depression? We must question the basis of the guidelines themselves. BMJ. 2000 Jan 22;320(7229):200–201. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7229.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Littlejohns P., Cluzeau F., Bale R., Grimshaw J., Feder G., Moran S. The quantity and quality of clinical practice guidelines for the management of depression in primary care in the UK. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Mar;49(440):205–210. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peveler R., Kendrick T. Treatment delivery and guidelines in primary care. Br Med Bull. 2001;57:193–206. doi: 10.1093/bmb/57.1.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shield T., Campbell S., Rogers A., Worrall A., Chew-Graham C., Gask L. Quality indicators for primary care mental health services. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr;12(2):100–106. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stark S., Stronach I., Warne T. Teamwork in mental health: rhetoric and reality. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2002 Aug;9(4):411–418. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2850.2002.00496.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson C., Kinmonth A. L., Stevens L., Peveler R. C., Stevens A., Ostler K. J., Pickering R. M., Baker N. G., Henson A., Preece J. Effects of a clinical-practice guideline and practice-based education on detection and outcome of depression in primary care: Hampshire Depression Project randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000 Jan 15;355(9199):185–191. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)03171-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tyrer P. The National Service Framework: a scaffold for mental health. Implementation is key to determining whether it's a support or a gallows. BMJ. 1999 Oct 16;319(7216):1017–1018. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7216.1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Upton M. W., Evans M., Goldberg D. P., Sharp D. J. Evaluation of ICD-10 PHC mental health guidelines in detecting and managing depression within primary care. Br J Psychiatry. 1999 Nov;175:476–482. doi: 10.1192/bjp.175.5.476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiles R., Robison J. Teamwork in primary care: the views and experiences of nurses, midwives and health visitors. J Adv Nurs. 1994 Aug;20(2):324–330. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20020324.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]