Skip to main content
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2004 Jun;13(3):186–190. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.006882

Improving prescribing using a rule based prescribing system

C Anton 1, P Nightingale 1, D Adu 1, G Lipkin 1, R Ferner 1
PMCID: PMC1743832  PMID: 15175488

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that the prescribing behaviour of doctors would improve after having experience with a computerised rule based prescribing system.

Design: A prospective observational study of changes in prescribing habits resulting from the use of a computerised prescribing system in (1) a cohort of experienced users compared with a new cohort, and (2) a single cohort at the beginning and after 3 weeks of computer aided prescribing.

Setting: 64 bed renal unit in a teaching hospital.

Intervention: Routine use of a computerised prescribing system by doctors and nurses on a renal unit from 1 July to 31 August 2001.

Main outcome measures: Number of warning messages generated by the system; proportion of warning messages overridden; comparison between doctors of different grades; comparison by doctors' familiarity with the system.

Results: A total of 51 612 records relating to 5995 prescriptions made by 103 users, of whom 42 were doctors, were analysed. The prescriptions generated 15 853 messages, of which 6592 were warning messages indicating prescribing errors or problems. Doctors new to the system generated fewer warning messages after using the system for 3 weeks (0.81 warning messages per prescription v 0.42 after 3 weeks, p = 0.03). Doctors with more experience of the system were less likely to generate a warning message (Spearman's ρ = –0.90, p = 0.04) but were more likely to disregard one (Spearman's ρ = –1, p<0.01). Senior doctors were more likely than junior doctors to ignore a warning message.

Conclusions: Doctors are influenced by the experience of using a computerised prescribing system. When judged by the number of warning messages generated per prescription, their prescribing improves with time and number of prescriptions written. Consultants and registrars are more likely to use their clinical judgement to override warning messages regarding prescribed drugs.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (85.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anton Christopher, Cox Anthony Richard, Ferner Robin Esmond. Using trade names: sometimes it helps. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Dec 9;162(22):2636–2637. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.22.2636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates D. W., Leape L. L., Cullen D. J., Laird N., Petersen L. A., Teich J. M., Burdick E., Hickey M., Kleefield S., Shea B. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1311–1316. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dean Bryony, Schachter Mike, Vincent Charles, Barber Nick. Causes of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a prospective study. Lancet. 2002 Apr 20;359(9315):1373–1378. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08350-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Glassman Peter A., Simon Barbara, Belperio Pamela, Lanto Andrew. Improving recognition of drug interactions: benefits and barriers to using automated drug alerts. Med Care. 2002 Dec;40(12):1161–1171. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200212000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Leape L. L., Bates D. W., Cullen D. J., Cooper J., Demonaco H. J., Gallivan T., Hallisey R., Ives J., Laird N., Laffel G. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995 Jul 5;274(1):35–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Magnus D., Rodgers S., Avery A. J. GPs' views on computerized drug interaction alerts: questionnaire survey. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2002 Oct;27(5):377–382. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2002.00434.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Meyer T. A. Improving the quality of the order-writing process for inpatient orders and outpatient prescriptions. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2000 Dec 15;57 (Suppl 4):S18–S22. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/57.suppl_4.S18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nightingale P. G., Adu D., Richards N. T., Peters M. Implementation of rules based computerised bedside prescribing and administration: intervention study. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):750–753. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rodríguez-Vera F. Javier, Marín Y., Sánchez A., Borrachero C., Pujol E. Illegible handwriting in medical records. J R Soc Med. 2002 Nov;95(11):545–546. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.95.11.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES