Skip to main content
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2004 Jun;13(3):203–205. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.3.203

Effect of a scoring system and protocol for sedation on duration of patients' need for ventilator support in a surgical intensive care unit*

G Brattebo 1, D Hofoss 1, H Flaatten 1, A Muri 1, S Gjerde 1, P Plsek 1
PMCID: PMC1743842  PMID: 15175491

Abstract



Problem: Need for improved sedation strategy for adults receiving ventilator support.

Design: Observational study of effect of introduction of guidelines to improve the doctors' and nurses' performance. The project was a prospective improvement and was part of a national quality improvement collaborative.

Background and setting: A general mixed surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital; all doctors and nurses in the unit; all adult patients (>18 years) treated by intermittent positive pressure ventilation for more than 24 hours.

Key measures for improvement: Reduction in patients' mean time on a ventilator and length of stay in intensive care over a period of 11 months; anonymous reporting of critical incidents; staff perceptions of ease and of consequences of changes.

Strategies for change: Multiple measures (protocol development, educational presentations, written guidelines, posters, flyers, emails, personal discussions, and continuous feedback) were tested, rapidly assessed, and adopted if beneficial.

Effects of change: Mean ventilator time decreased by 2.1 days (95% confidence interval 0.7 to 3.6 days) from 7.4 days before intervention to 5.3 days after. Mean stay decreased by 1.0 day (–0.9 to 2.9 days) from 9.3 days to 8.3 days. No accidental extubations or other incidents were identified.

Lessons learnt: Relatively simple changes in sedation practice had significant effects on length of ventilator support. The change process was well received by the staff and increased their interest in identifying other areas for improvement.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (78.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barr J., Donner A. Optimal intravenous dosing strategies for sedatives and analgesics in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin. 1995 Oct;11(4):827–847. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brock W. A., Nolan K., Nolan T. Pragmatic science: accelerating the improvement of critical care. New Horiz. 1998 Feb;6(1):61–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brook A. D., Ahrens T. S., Schaiff R., Prentice D., Sherman G., Shannon W., Kollef M. H. Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 1999 Dec;27(12):2609–2615. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199912000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clemmer T. P., Spuhler V. J., Oniki T. A., Horn S. D. Results of a collaborative quality improvement program on outcomes and costs in a tertiary critical care unit. Crit Care Med. 1999 Sep;27(9):1768–1774. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199909000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Devlin J. W., Boleski G., Mlynarek M., Nerenz D. R., Peterson E., Jankowski M., Horst H. M., Zarowitz B. J. Motor Activity Assessment Scale: a valid and reliable sedation scale for use with mechanically ventilated patients in an adult surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1999 Jul;27(7):1271–1275. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199907000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kollef M. H., Horst H. M., Prang L., Brock W. A. Reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation: three examples of change in the intensive care unit. New Horiz. 1998 Feb;6(1):52–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kollef M. H., Levy N. T., Ahrens T. S., Schaiff R., Prentice D., Sherman G. The use of continuous i.v. sedation is associated with prolongation of mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1998 Aug;114(2):541–548. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.2.541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kress J. P., Pohlman A. S., O'Connor M. F., Hall J. B. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1471–1477. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Le Gall J. R., Lemeshow S., Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993 Dec 22;270(24):2957–2963. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.24.2957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marx W. H., DeMaintenon N. L., Mooney K. F., Mascia M. L., Medicis J., Franklin P. D., Sivak E., Rotello L. Cost reduction and outcome improvement in the intensive care unit. J Trauma. 1999 Apr;46(4):625–630. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199904000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McQuay H. J. Opioid use in chronic pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997 Jan;41(1 Pt 2):175–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04634.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mraović B., Jurisić T., Kogler-Majeric V., Sustic A. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine for analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997 Feb;41(2):193–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04664.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Plsek P. E. Quality improvement methods in clinical medicine. Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):203–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES