Skip to main content
PMC home page
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2004 Oct;13(5):374–378. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.008292

Patients' experiences of an open access follow up arrangement in managing inflammatory bowel disease

A Rogers 1, A Kennedy 1, E Nelson 1, A Robinson 1
PMCID: PMC1743885  PMID: 15465941

Abstract

Background: Improving access is a key policy issue in improving quality of care and extending patient choice and participation. People's experience of changing from fixed outpatient appointments to more flexible direct access arrangements for chronic disease has been underexplored.

Objectives: To examine patients' views on using an open system of access compared with fixed outpatient appointments as part of a guided self-management intervention for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Design: Embedded qualitative study undertaken alongside a randomised controlled trial. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken to obtain an in depth understanding of patients' experience of the change in access arrangements.

Participants: A purposive sample (n = 30) was drawn from the intervention group (n = 700) according to a range of responses to the trial baseline and follow up quantitative measures.

Results: 28 interviews were included in the analysis. Compared with the previous system of fixed appointments, preference for the new open access system was based on enhanced personal control in contacting services and the view that it fitted better with everyday routine management and the requirement for urgent medical contact when symptoms fail to respond to medication. Preference for retaining fixed appointments was based on a sense of security from gaining access which did not require the individual to initiate the request for medical help.

Conclusions: Open access may fit better with patients' self-management of their condition and everyday routines, roles and responsibilities. Ensuring that outpatient organisational arrangements and personnel are responsive to patient initiated requests for appointments is likely to impact on the acceptability of this type of access arrangement. Some people may continue to prefer the fixed appointment system which should be retained if patient choice is to be respected.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (71.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arber S., Sawyer L. The role of the receptionist in general practice: a 'dragon behind the desk'? Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(9):911–921. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90347-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bury M. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociol Health Illn. 1982 Jul;4(2):167–182. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11339939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gallagher M., Pearson P., Drinkwater C., Guy J. Managing patient demand: a qualitative study of appointment making in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Apr;51(465):280–285. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hassell K., Whittington Z., Cantrill J., Bates F., Rogers A., Noyce P. Managing demand: transfer of management of self limiting conditions from general practice to community pharmacies. BMJ. 2001 Jul 21;323(7305):146–147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kennedy A., Rogers A. Improving self-management skills: a whole systems approach. Br J Nurs. 2001 Jun 14;10(11):734–737. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2001.10.11.10435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kennedy Anne P., Robinson Andrew J., Thompson David G., Wilkin David. Development of a guidebook to promote patient participation in the management of ulcerative colitis. Health Soc Care Community. 1999 May;7(3):177–186. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.1999.00174.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mansfield J. C., Tanner A. R., Bramble M. G. Information for patients about inflammatory bowel disease. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1997 Mar-Apr;31(2):184–187. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. O'Cathain A., Munro J. F., Nicholl J. P., Knowles E. How helpful is NHS direct? Postal survey of callers. BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1035–1035. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pencheon David. Intermediate care. BMJ. 2002 Jun 8;324(7350):1347–1348. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7350.1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Robinson A., Thompson D. G., Wilkin D., Roberts C., Northwest Gastrointestinal Research Group Guided self-management and patient-directed follow-up of ulcerative colitis: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2001 Sep 22;358(9286):976–981. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06105-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rogers A., Entwistle V., Pencheon D. A patient led NHS: managing demand at the interface between lay and primary care. BMJ. 1998 Jun 13;316(7147):1816–1819. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7147.1816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Von Korff M., Gruman J., Schaefer J., Curry S. J., Wagner E. H. Collaborative management of chronic illness. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Dec 15;127(12):1097–1102. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-12-199712150-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Williams G. The genesis of chronic illness: narrative re-construction. Sociol Health Illn. 1984 Jul;6(2):175–200. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10778250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Williams J. G., Cheung W. Y., Russell I. T., Cohen D. R., Longo M., Lervy B. Open access follow up for inflammatory bowel disease: pragmatic randomised trial and cost effectiveness study. BMJ. 2000 Feb 26;320(7234):544–548. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7234.544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES