Abstract
Background: A national cross sectional study was undertaken to explore the perceptions concerning the importance of, and progress in, aspects of clinical governance among board level and directorate managers in English acute, ambulance, and mental health/learning disabilities (MH/LD) trusts.
Participants: A stratified sample of acute, ambulance, and mental health/learning disabilities trusts in England (n = 100), from each of which up to 10 board level and 10 directorate level managers were randomly sampled.
Methods: Fieldwork was undertaken between April and July 2002 using the Organisational Progress in Clinical Governance (OPCG) schedule to explore managers' perceptions of the importance of, and organisational achievement in, 54 clinical governance competency items in five aggregated domains: improving quality; managing risks; improving staff performance; corporate accountability; and leadership and collaboration. The difference between ratings of importance and achievement was termed a shortfall.
Results: Of 1916 individuals surveyed, 1177 (61.4%) responded. The competency items considered most important and recording highest perceived achievement related to corporate accountability structures and clinical risks. The highest shortfalls between perceived importance and perceived achievement were reported in joint working across local health communities, feedback of performance data, and user involvement. When aggregated into domains, greatest achievement was perceived in the assurance related areas of corporate accountability and risk management, with considerably less perceived achievement and consequently higher shortfalls in quality improvement and leadership and collaboration. Directorate level managers' perceptions of achievement were found to be significantly lower than those of their board level colleagues on all domains other than improving performance. No differences were found in perceptions of achievement between different types of trusts, or between trusts at different stages in the Commission for Health Improvement (CHI) review cycle.
Conclusions: While structures and systems for clinical governance seem well established, there is more perceived progress in areas concerned with quality assurance than quality improvement. This study raises some uncomfortable questions about the impact of CHI review visits.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (156.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Buetow S. A., Roland M. Clinical governance: bridging the gap between managerial and clinical approaches to quality of care. Qual Health Care. 1999 Sep;8(3):184–190. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.3.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell S. M., Sheaff R., Sibbald B., Marshall M. N., Pickard S., Gask L., Halliwell S., Rogers A., Roland M. O. Implementing clinical governance in English primary care groups/trusts: reconciling quality improvement and quality assurance. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Mar;11(1):9–14. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freeman T. Measuring progress in clinical governance: assessing the reliability and validity of the Clinical Governance Climate Questionnaire. Health Serv Manage Res. 2003 Nov;16(4):234–250. doi: 10.1258/095148403322488937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freeman Tim. Using performance indicators to improve health care quality in the public sector: a review of the literature. Health Serv Manage Res. 2002 May;15(2):126–137. doi: 10.1258/0951484021912897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goddard M., Mannion R., Smith P. Enhancing performance in health care: a theoretical perspective on agency and the role of information. Health Econ. 2000 Mar;9(2):95–107. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(200003)9:2<95::aid-hec488>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halligan A., Donaldson L. Implementing clinical governance: turning vision into reality. BMJ. 2001 Jun 9;322(7299):1413–1417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7299.1413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roland M., Campbell S., Wilkin D. Clinical governance: a convincing strategy for quality improvement? J Manag Med. 2001;15(3):188–201. doi: 10.1108/02689230110403678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silimperi Diana R., Franco Lynne Miller, Veldhuyzen van Zanten Tisna, MacAulay Catherine. A framework for institutionalizing quality assurance. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 Dec;14 (Suppl 1):67–73. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.suppl_1.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singer S. J., Gaba D. M., Geppert J. J., Sinaiko A. D., Howard S. K., Park K. C. The culture of safety: results of an organization-wide survey in 15 California hospitals. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr;12(2):112–118. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wallace L. M., Freeman T., Latham L., Walshe K., Spurgeon P. Organisational strategies for changing clinical practice: how trusts are meeting the challenges of clinical governance. Qual Health Care. 2001 Jun;10(2):76–82. doi: 10.1136/qhc.10.2.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]