Abstract
Objective: To develop and evaluate "Treat and Refer" protocols for ambulance crews, allowing them to leave patients at the scene with onward referral or self-care advice as appropriate.
Methods: Crew members from one ambulance station were trained to use the treatment protocols. Processes and outcomes of care for patients attended by trained crews were compared with similar patients attended by crews from a neighbouring station. Pre-hospital records were collected for all patients. Records of any emergency department and primary care contacts during the 14 days following the call were collected for non-conveyed patients who were also followed up by postal questionnaire.
Results: Twenty three protocols were developed which were expected to cover over 75% of patients left at the scene by the attending crew. There were 251 patients in the intervention arm and 537 in the control arm. The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex and condition category but intervention cases were more likely to have been attended during daytime hours than at night. There was no difference in the proportion of patients left at the scene in the intervention and control arms; the median job cycle time was longer for intervention group patients. Protocols were reported as having been used in 101 patients (40.2%) in the intervention group; 17 of the protocols were recorded as having been used at least once during the study. Clinical documentation was generally higher in the intervention group, although a similar proportion of patients in both groups had no clinical assessments recorded. 288 patients were left at the scene (93 in the intervention group, 195 in the control group). After excluding those who refused to travel, there were three non-conveyed patients in each group who were admitted to hospital within 14 days of the call who were judged to have been left at home inappropriately. A higher proportion of patients in the intervention arm reported satisfaction with the service and advice provided.
Conclusions: "Treat and Refer" protocols did not increase the number of patients left at home but were used by crews and were acceptable to patients. The protocols increased job cycle time and some safety issues were identified. Their introduction is complex, and the extent to which the content of the protocols, decision support and training can be refined needs further study.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (157.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Carey R. G., Seibert J. H. A patient survey system to measure quality improvement: questionnaire reliability and validity. Med Care. 1993 Sep;31(9):834–845. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199309000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen J. C., Bullard M. J., Liaw S. J. Ambulance use, misuse, and unmet needs in a developing emergency medical services system. Eur J Emerg Med. 1996 Jun;3(2):73–78. doi: 10.1097/00063110-199606000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenkinson C., Coulter A., Bruster S., Richards N., Chandola T. Patients' experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):335–339. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morris D. L., Cross A. B. Is the emergency ambulance service abused? Br Med J. 1980 Jul 12;281(6233):121–123. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6233.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Leary C., Bury G., McCabe M., Kelly C., McGoldrick F., Ward F. Ambulance-user analysis in an accident and emergency department. Ir Med J. 1987 Dec;80(12):422–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rademaker A. W., Powell D. G., Read J. H. Inappropriate use and unmet need in paramedic and nonparamedic ambulance systems. Ann Emerg Med. 1987 May;16(5):553–556. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(87)80684-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt T., Atcheson R., Federiuk C., Mann N. C., Pinney T., Fuller D., Colbry K. Evaluation of protocols allowing emergency medical technicians to determine need for treatment and transport. Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Jun;7(6):663–669. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02041.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snooks H. A., Dale J., Hartley-Sharpe C., Halter M. On-scene alternatives for emergency ambulance crews attending patients who do not need to travel to the accident and emergency department: a review of the literature. Emerg Med J. 2004 Mar;21(2):212–215. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.005199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snooks H., Wrigley H., George S., Thomas E., Smith H., Glasper A. Appropriateness of use of emergency ambulances. J Accid Emerg Med. 1998 Jul;15(4):212–215. doi: 10.1136/emj.15.4.212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snooks Helen, Williams Susan, Crouch Robert, Foster Theresa, Hartley-Sharpe Chris, Dale Jeremy. NHS emergency response to 999 calls: alternatives for cases that are neither life threatening nor serious. BMJ. 2002 Aug 10;325(7359):330–333. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7359.330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suserud B. O., Haljamäe H. Nurse competence: advantageous in pre-hospital emergency care? Accid Emerg Nurs. 1999 Jan;7(1):18–25. doi: 10.1016/s0965-2302(99)80096-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suserud B. O., Wallman-C:son K. A., Haljamäe H. Assessment of the quality improvement of prehospital emergency care in Sweden. Eur J Emerg Med. 1998 Dec;5(4):407–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]