Skip to main content
PMC home page
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2005 Feb;14(1):51–55. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011510

Paradoxes of French accreditation

M Pomey 1, P Francois 1, A Contandriopoulos 1, A Tosh 1, D Bertrand 1
PMCID: PMC1743956  PMID: 15692004

Abstract



 The accreditation system introduced into the French healthcare system in 1996 has five particular characteristics: (1) it is mandatory for all healthcare establishments; (2) it is performed by an independent government agency; (3) surveyors have to report all instances of non-compliance with safety regulations; (4) the accreditation report is delivered to regional administrative authorities and a summary is made available to the public; and (5) regional administrative authorities can use the information contained in the accreditation report to revise hospital budgets. These give rise to a number of paradoxes: (1) the fact that accreditation is mandatory lends itself to ambiguity and likens the process to an inspection; (2) the fact that decision makers can use the information contained in the accreditation report for resource allocation can incite establishments to adopt strategic behaviours aimed merely at complying with the accreditation manual; and (3) there is a tendency for establishments to reduce quality processes to nothing more than the completion of accreditation and to focus efforts on standardizing practices and resolving safety issues to the detriment of organizational development. All accreditation systems must be aware of these paradoxes and decide on the level of government involvement and the relationship between accreditation and resource allocation. With time, accreditation in France could benefit from both a professionally driven system and from the increased amount of freedom to focus on quality improvement which is necessary for organizational development.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (69.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Badrick T., Preston A. Influences on the implementation of TQM in health care organizations: professional bureaucracies, ownership and complexity. Aust Health Rev. 2001;24(1):166–175. doi: 10.1071/ah010166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berwick D. M., Nolan T. W. Physicians as leaders in improving health care: a new series in Annals of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Feb 15;128(4):289–292. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-4-199802150-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Briand S., Bazin A., Gerbaud L. Perceptions de la qualité dans le secteur sanitaire et impact sur la démarche qualité. Cah Sociol Demogr Med. 2001 Jan-Mar;41(1):29–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davidow S. L. Physicians taking the lead to improve patient care. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999 Mar;25(3):145–152. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30434-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Duckett S. J. Changing hospitals: the role of hospital accreditation. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(20):1573–1579. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(83)90102-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Firth-Cozens J., Mowbray D. Leadership and the quality of care. Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;10 (Suppl 2):ii3–ii7. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100003... [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hayes J., Shaw C. D. Implementing accreditation systems (23 May 1994, Treviso, Italy). Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Jun;7(2):165–171. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.2.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaiser L. R. The physician executive in a changing world. Physician Exec. 1999 Mar-Apr;25(2):10–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Milakovich M. E. Creating a total quality health care environment. Health Care Manage Rev. 1991 Spring;16(2):9–20. doi: 10.1097/00004010-199101620-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Motwani J., Sower V. E., Brashier L. W. Implementing TQM in the health care sector. Health Care Manage Rev. 1996 Winter;21(1):73–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roberts J. S., Coale J. G., Redman R. R. A history of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals. JAMA. 1987 Aug 21;258(7):936–940. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schwartz R. W., Pogge C. Physician leadership: essential skills in a changing environment. Am J Surg. 2000 Sep;180(3):187–192. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00481-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Scrivens E. International trends in accreditation. Int J Health Plann Manage. 1995 Jul-Sep;10(3):165–181. doi: 10.1002/hpm.4740100303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shekelle P. G. Why don't physicians enthusiastically support quality improvement programmes? Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Mar;11(1):6–6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.1.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shortell S. M., Levin D. Z., O'Brien J. L., Hughes E. F. Assessing the evidence on CQI: is the glass half empty or half full? Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1995 Spring;40(1):4–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sicotte C., Champagne F., Contandriopoulos A. P., Barnsley J., Béland F., Leggat S. G., Denis J. L., Bilodeau H., Langley A., Brémond M. A conceptual framework for the analysis of health care organizations' performance. Health Serv Manage Res. 1998 Feb;11(1):24–48. doi: 10.1177/095148489801100106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES