Abstract
Objectives: To use data from the 2001–2 National Stroke Audit to describe the organisation of stroke units in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and to see if key characteristics deemed effective from the research literature were present.
Design: Data were collected as part of the National Sentinel Audit of Stroke in 2001, both on the organisation and structure of inpatient stroke care and the process of care to hospitals managing stroke patients.
Setting: 240 hospitals from England, Wales and Northern Ireland took part in the 2001–2 National Stroke Audit, a response rate of over 95%. These sites audited a total of 8200 patients.
Audit tool: Royal College of Physicians Intercollegiate Working Party Stroke Audit Tool.
Results: 73% of hospitals participating in the audit had a stroke unit but only 36% of stroke admissions spent any time on one. Only 46% of all units describing themselves as stroke units had all five organisational characteristics that previous research literature had identified as being key features, while 26% had four and 28% had three or less. Better organisation was associated with better process of care for patients, with patients managed on stroke units receiving better care than those managed in other settings.
Conclusion: The National Service Framework for Older People set a target for all hospitals treating stroke patients to have a stroke unit by April 2004. This study suggests that in many hospitals this is being achieved without adequate resource and expertise.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (87.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Busse Otto. Stroke units and stroke services in Germany. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;15 (Suppl 1):8–10. doi: 10.1159/000068212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glader E. L., Stegmayr B., Johansson L., Hulter-Asberg K., Wester P. O. Differences in long-term outcome between patients treated in stroke units and in general wards: a 2-year follow-up of stroke patients in sweden. Stroke. 2001 Sep;32(9):2124–2130. doi: 10.1161/hs0901.095724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gompertz P. H., Irwin P., Morris R., Lowe D., Rutledge Z., Rudd A. G., Pearson M. G. Reliability and validity of the Intercollegiate Stroke Audit Package. J Eval Clin Pract. 2001 Feb;7(1):1–11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00274.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hommel Marc, Deblasi Alain, Garambois Katia, Jaillard Assia. The French stroke program. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;15 (Suppl 1):11–13. doi: 10.1159/000068206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langhorne Peter, Dennis Martin S. Stroke units: the next 10 years. Lancet. 2004 Mar 13;363(9412):834–835. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15771-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rudd A. G., Lowe D., Irwin P., Rutledge Z., Pearson M., Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party National stroke audit: a tool for change? Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10(3):141–151. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100141... [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stegmayr B., Asplund K., Hulter-Asberg K., Norrving B., Peltonen M., Terént A., Wester P. O. Stroke units in their natural habitat: can results of randomized trials be reproduced in routine clinical practice? Riks-Stroke Collaboration. Stroke. 1999 Apr;30(4):709–714. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.4.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]