Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the readmission experience of a large national prospective cohort of women up to 5 years after undergoing either transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) or hysterectomy to assess reasons for readmission and whether TCRE can be viewed as a definitive substitute for hysterectomy.
Design and participants: Data are from the VALUE/MISTLETOE prospective national cohort studies of hysterectomy and TCRE respectively. 5294 women who underwent hysterectomy for dysfunctional uterine bleeding in 1994/5 and 4032 women who underwent TCRE in 1993/4 and who responded to postal questionnaires were included. Surgeons gathered operative details. Women completed postal follow up questionnaires at 3 and 5 years after surgery asking about readmission to hospital and reasons for readmission. Adjusted proportional hazard ratios were calculated for likelihood of readmission in each category comparing types of surgery.
Results: 41.7% of women undergoing hysterectomy and 44.6% of women undergoing TCRE experienced one or more readmissions to hospital overall within 5 years (adjusted hazard ratio for all readmissions (AHR) 0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 0.95)). 12.6% of hysterectomy patients and 30.3% of TCRE patients were readmitted for gynaecological reasons (AHR 0.40 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.48)). Rates of readmission for gynaecological reasons were similar up to 6 months but were markedly reduced for hysterectomy compared with TCRE patients towards the end of the follow up period (AHR for readmission at 3–5 years 0.28 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.39)).
Conclusions: There are differences in the pattern of readmission to hospital after hysterectomy and TCRE for dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Women undergoing a hysterectomy are less likely to be readmitted to hospital up to 5 years after their operation overall, and are significantly less likely to be readmitted for reasons related to their operation, particularly for gynaecological reasons. Hysterectomy appears to be a more definitive operation. The different options for surgery for dysfunctional uterine bleeding are not interchangeable; they represent different patterns of care. Information should be available to women and practitioners to inform choices between these options.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (99.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bhavnani Vanita, Clarke Aileen. Women awaiting hysterectomy: a qualitative study of issues involved in decisions about oophorectomy. BJOG. 2003 Feb;110(2):168–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bridgman S. A., Dunn K. M. Has endometrial ablation replaced hysterectomy for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding? National figures. BJOG. 2000 Apr;107(4):531–534. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13274.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clarke A., Black N., Rowe P., Mott S., Howle K. Indications for and outcome of total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a prospective cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Aug;102(8):611–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11398.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clarke A. Readmission to hospital: a measure of quality or outcome? Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Feb;13(1):10–11. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.008789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coulter A., McPherson K., Vessey M. Do British women undergo too many or too few hysterectomies? Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(9):987–994. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90289-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crosignani P. G., Vercellini P., Apolone G., De Giorgi O., Cortesi I., Meschia M. Endometrial resection versus vaginal hysterectomy for menorrhagia: long-term clinical and quality-of-life outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jul;177(1):95–101. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70445-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kennedy Andrew D. M., Sculpher Mark J., Coulter Angela, Dwyer Nuala, Rees Margaret, Abrams Keith R., Horsley Susan, Cowley Deborah, Kidson Christine, Kirwin Catherine. Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002 Dec 4;288(21):2701–2708. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.21.2701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milne R., Clarke A. Can readmission rates be used as an outcome indicator? BMJ. 1990 Nov 17;301(6761):1139–1140. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6761.1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Overton C., Hargreaves J., Maresh M. A national survey of the complications of endometrial destruction for menstrual disorders: the MISTLETOE study. Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques--Laser, EndoThermal or Endorescetion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Dec;104(12):1351–1359. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith Blair H., Elliott Alison M., Hannaford Philip C., Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study Is chronic pain a distinct diagnosis in primary care? Evidence arising from the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception study. Fam Pract. 2004 Feb;21(1):66–74. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]