Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2005 Apr;14(2):107–112. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.009357

Effect on the process of care of an active strategy to implement clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial

G Bekkering 1, H Hendriks 1, M W van Tulder 1, D Knol 1, M Hoeijenbos 1, R Oostendorp 1, L Bouter 1
PMCID: PMC1743983  PMID: 15805455

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effect on the process of care of an active strategy to implement clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain.

Design: A cluster randomised controlled trial comparing an active strategy with standard dissemination.

Setting: Primary care physiotherapy practices.

Participants: 113 physiotherapists were randomly allocated to receive the guidelines by mail (control group) or to receive an additional active strategy (intervention group) which consisted of a multifaceted programme including education, discussion, role playing, feedback, and reminders.

Main outcome measures: Adherence to the guidelines was measured by means of individual patients' forms recording the treatment completed by the physiotherapist. The forms were assessed using an algorithm based on the number of treatment sessions, treatment goals, interventions, and patient education.

Results: Physiotherapists in the intervention group more often correctly limited the number of treatment sessions for patients with a normal course of back pain (OR 2.39; 95% CI 1.12 to 5.12), more often set functional treatment goals (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.06 to 3.72), more often used mainly active interventions (OR 2.79; 95% CI 1.19 to 6.55), and more often gave adequate patient education (OR 3.59; 95% CI 1.35 to 9.55). They also adhered more to all four criteria (OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.15 to 3.65).

Conclusions: The active strategy moderately improved adherence to the guidelines. Active strategies are recommended to implement the clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (99.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams A. S., Soumerai S. B., Lomas J., Ross-Degnan D. Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Jun;11(3):187–192. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.3.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Assendelft Willem J. J., Morton Sally C., Yu Emily I., Suttorp Marika J., Shekelle Paul G. Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain. A meta-analysis of effectiveness relative to other therapies. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jun 3;138(11):871–881. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-11-200306030-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bekkering Geertruida E., Engers Arno J., Wensing Michael, Hendriks Henricus J. M., van Tulder Maurits W., Oostendorp Rob A. B., Bouter Lex M. Development of an implementation strategy for physiotherapy guidelines on low back pain. Aust J Physiother. 2003;49(3):208–214. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60240-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bero L. A., Grilli R., Grimshaw J. M., Harvey E., Oxman A. D., Thomson M. A. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ. 1998 Aug 15;317(7156):465–468. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7156.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cherkin Daniel C., Sherman Karen J., Deyo Richard A., Shekelle Paul G. A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy, and spinal manipulation for back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jun 3;138(11):898–906. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-11-200306030-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis D. A., Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ. 1997 Aug 15;157(4):408–416. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davis D. A., Thomson M. A., Oxman A. D., Haynes R. B. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995 Sep 6;274(9):700–705. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.9.700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grimshaw J. M., Shirran L., Thomas R., Mowatt G., Fraser C., Bero L., Grilli R., Harvey E., Oxman A., O'Brien M. A. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8 Suppl 2):II2–I45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grimshaw J., Freemantle N., Wallace S., Russell I., Hurwitz B., Watt I., Long A., Sheldon T. Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;4(1):55–64. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grol R., Grimshaw J. Evidence-based implementation of evidence-based medicine. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999 Oct;25(10):503–513. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30464-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grol R. Improving the quality of medical care: building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction. JAMA. 2001 Nov 28;286(20):2578–2585. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.20.2578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gross P. A., Greenfield S., Cretin S., Ferguson J., Grimshaw J., Grol R., Klazinga N., Lorenz W., Meyer G. S., Riccobono C. Optimal methods for guideline implementation: conclusions from Leeds Castle meeting. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8 Suppl 2):II85–II92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Koes B. W., van Tulder M. W., Ostelo R., Kim Burton A., Waddell G. Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001 Nov 15;26(22):2504–2514. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200111150-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kopec J. A., Esdaile J. M., Abrahamowicz M., Abenhaim L., Wood-Dauphinee S., Lamping D. L., Williams J. I. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995 Feb 1;20(3):341–352. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199502000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moulding N. T., Silagy C. A., Weller D. P. A framework for effective management of change in clinical practice: dissemination and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Qual Health Care. 1999 Sep;8(3):177–183. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.3.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schoppink L. E., van Tulder M. W., Koes B. W., Beurskens S. A., de Bie R. A. Reliability and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther. 1996 Mar;76(3):268–275. doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.3.268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wensing M., van der Weijden T., Grol R. Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective? Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Feb;48(427):991–997. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Woolf S. H., Grol R., Hutchinson A., Eccles M., Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999 Feb 20;318(7182):527–530. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. van Tulder M. W., Malmivaara A., Esmail R., Koes B. W. Exercise therapy for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000335–CD000335. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES