Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2005 Apr;14(2):80–86. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011957

Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technology

M Husch 1, C Sullivan 1, D Rooney 1, C Barnard 1, M Fotis 1, J Clarke 1, G Noskin 1
PMCID: PMC1743987  PMID: 15805451

Abstract

Background: Intravenous (IV) medication errors are a common type of error identified in hospitals and can lead to considerable harm. Over the past 20 years there have been several hundred FDA reported incidents involving IV pumps, many of which have led to patient deaths.

Objective: To determine the actual types, frequency, and severity of medication errors associated with IV pumps. To evaluate the likelihood that smart pump technology without an interface to other systems could have prevented errors.

Methods: Using a point prevalence approach, investigators prospectively compared the medication, dose, and infusion rate on the IV pump with the prescribed medication, doses, and rate in the medical record. Preventability with smart pump technology was retrospectively determined based on a rigorous definition of currently available technology.

Results: A total of 426 medications were observed infusing through an IV pump. Of these, 285 (66.9%) had one or more errors associated with their administration. There were 389 documented errors overall; 37 were "rate deviation" errors and three of these were judged to be due to a programming mistake. Most of the documented events would not have caused patient harm (NCC MERP category C). Only one error would have been prevented by smart pump technology without additional interface and software capabilities.

Conclusion: Medication errors associated with IV pumps occur frequently, have the potential to cause harm, and are epidemiologically diverse. Smart pumps are a necessary component of a comprehensive safe medication system. However, currently available smart pumps will fail to generate meaningful improvements in patient safety until they can be interfaced with other systems such as the electronic medical record, computerized prescriber order entry, bar coded medication administration systems, and pharmacy information systems. Future research should focus on the effectiveness of new technology in preventing latent and active errors, and on new types of error that any technology can introduce.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (81.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ash Joan S., Berg Marc, Coiera Enrico. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov 21;11(2):104–112. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baranowski L. Presidential address: take ownership. J Intraven Nurs. 1995 Jul-Aug;18(4):162–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barker K. N. Data collection techniques: observation. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1980 Sep;37(9):1235–1243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates D. W., Cullen D. J., Laird N., Petersen L. A., Small S. D., Servi D., Laffel G., Sweitzer B. J., Shea B. F., Hallisey R. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995 Jul 5;274(1):29–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bates D. W., Teich J. M., Lee J., Seger D., Kuperman G. J., Ma'Luf N., Boyle D., Leape L. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Jul-Aug;6(4):313–321. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1999.00660313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bates David W., Evans R. Scott, Murff Harvey, Stetson Peter D., Pizziferri Lisa, Hripcsak George. Detecting adverse events using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Mar-Apr;10(2):115–128. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bobb Anne, Gleason Kristine, Husch Marla, Feinglass Joe, Yarnold Paul R., Noskin Gary A. The epidemiology of prescribing errors: the potential impact of computerized prescriber order entry. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Apr 12;164(7):785–792. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.7.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown S. L., Morrison A. E., Parmentier C. M., Woo E. K., Vishnuvajjala R. L. Infusion pump adverse events: experience from medical device reports. J Intraven Nurs. 1997 Jan-Feb;20(1):41–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Calabrese A. D., Erstad B. L., Brandl K., Barletta J. F., Kane S. L., Sherman D. S. Medication administration errors in adult patients in the ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2001 Oct;27(10):1592–1598. doi: 10.1007/s001340101065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Flynn Fran, Mohr Lynn, Lawlor-Klean Phyllis. Right programming of pumps to prevent errors in the infusion process. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Jan;29(1):37-40, 1. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(03)29005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Herout Peter M., Erstad Brian L. Medication errors involving continuously infused medications in a surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2004 Feb;32(2):428–432. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000108876.12846.B7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaushal R., Bates D. W., Landrigan C., McKenna K. J., Clapp M. D., Federico F., Goldmann D. A. Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. JAMA. 2001 Apr 25;285(16):2114–2120. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.16.2114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McNutt Robert A., Abrams Richard, Arons David C., Patient Safety Committee Patient safety efforts should focus on medical errors. JAMA. 2002 Apr 17;287(15):1997–2001. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.15.1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. O'Neil A. C., Petersen L. A., Cook E. F., Bates D. W., Lee T. H., Brennan T. A. Physician reporting compared with medical-record review to identify adverse medical events. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Sep 1;119(5):370–376. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-5-199309010-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):768–770. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rosenthal Kelli. Smart pumps help crack the safety code. Nurs Manage. 2004 May;35(5):49–51. doi: 10.1097/00006247-200405000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stanhope N., Crowley-Murphy M., Vincent C., O'Connor A. M., Taylor-Adams S. E. An evaluation of adverse incident reporting. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Feb;5(1):5–12. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00146.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tamuz M., Thomas E. J., Franchois K. E. Defining and classifying medical error: lessons for patient safety reporting systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Feb;13(1):13–20. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2002.003376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Taxis K., Barber N. Causes of intravenous medication errors: an ethnographic study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Oct;12(5):343–347. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.5.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Taxis Katja, Barber Nick. Ethnographic study of incidence and severity of intravenous drug errors. BMJ. 2003 Mar 29;326(7391):684–684. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7391.684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Thomas Eric J., Lipsitz Stuart R., Studdert David M., Brennan Troyen A. The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 4;136(11):812–816. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-11-200206040-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilson Karen, Sullivan Mark. Preventing medication errors with smart infusion technology. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004 Jan 15;61(2):177–183. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/61.2.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES