Abstract
Background: Myocardial ischaemia and infarction are significant perioperative complications which are associated with poor patient outcome. Anaesthetic practice should therefore focus, particularly in the at risk patient, on their prevention, their accurate detection, on the identification of precipitating factors, and on rapid effective management.
Objectives: To examine the role of a previously described core algorithm "COVER ABCD–A SWIFT CHECK" supplemented by a specific sub-algorithm for myocardial ischaemia and infarction in the management of myocardial ischaemia and/or infarction occurring in association with anaesthesia.
Methods: The potential performance of this structured approach for each of the relevant incidents among the first 4000 reported to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study (AIMS) was compared with the actual management as reported by the anaesthetists involved.
Results: Of the 125 incidents retrieved from the 4000 reports, 40 (1%) were considered to demonstrate myocardial infarction or ischaemia. The use of the structured approach described in this paper would have led to appropriate management in 90% of cases, with the remaining 10% requiring other sub-algorithms. It was considered that the application of this structured approach would have led to earlier recognition and/or better management of the problem in 45% of cases.
Conclusion: Close and continuous monitoring of patients at risk of myocardial ischaemia during anaesthesia is necessary, using optimal ECG lead configurations, but sensitivity of this monitoring is not 100%. Coronary vasodilatation with glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) should not be withheld when indicated and the early use of beta blocking drugs should be considered even with normal blood pressures and heart rates.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (110.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Auerbach Andrew D., Goldman Lee. beta-Blockers and reduction of cardiac events in noncardiac surgery: scientific review. JAMA. 2002 Mar 20;287(11):1435–1444. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.11.1435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edwards N. D., Reilly C. S. Detection of perioperative myocardial ischaemia. Br J Anaesth. 1994 Jan;72(1):104–115. doi: 10.1093/bja/72.1.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellis J. E., Shah M. N., Briller J. E., Roizen M. F., Aronson S., Feinstein S. B. A comparison of methods for the detection of myocardial ischemia during noncardiac surgery: automated ST-segment analysis systems, electrocardiography, and transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg. 1992 Nov;75(5):764–772. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199211000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fehr D. M., Chambers C. E., Thiele B., Mangano D., Kingsley C. P. Case 4--1995. Perioperative myocardial infarction in a patient undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm resection: perioperative risk assessment. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1995 Aug;9(4):452–459. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(05)80104-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall R. I. Anaesthesia for coronary artery surgery--a plea for a goal-directed approach. Can J Anaesth. 1993 Dec;40(12):1178–1194. doi: 10.1007/BF03009608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Landesberg Giora, Mosseri Morris, Wolf Yehuda, Vesselov Yellena, Weissman Charles. Perioperative myocardial ischemia and infarction: identification by continuous 12-lead electrocardiogram with online ST-segment monitoring. Anesthesiology. 2002 Feb;96(2):264–270. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200202000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- London M. J., Hollenberg M., Wong M. G., Levenson L., Tubau J. F., Browner W., Mangano D. T. Intraoperative myocardial ischemia: localization by continuous 12-lead electrocardiography. Anesthesiology. 1988 Aug;69(2):232–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Runciman W. B., Webb R. K., Klepper I. D., Lee R., Williamson J. A., Barker L. The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Crisis management--validation of an algorithm by analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993 Oct;21(5):579–592. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9302100515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shah K. B., Kleinman B. S., Sami H., Patel J., Rao T. L. Reevaluation of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients with prior myocardial infarction undergoing noncardiac operations. Anesth Analg. 1990 Sep;71(3):231–235. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199009000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skidmore K. L., London M. J. Myocardial ischemia. Monitoring to diagnose ischemia: how do I monitor therapy? Anesthesiol Clin North America. 2001 Dec;19(4):651–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slogoff S., Keats A. S., David Y., Igo S. R. Incidence of perioperative myocardial ischemia detected by different electrocardiographic systems. Anesthesiology. 1990 Dec;73(6):1074–1081. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199012000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith J. S., Cahalan M. K., Benefiel D. J., Byrd B. F., Lurz F. W., Shapiro W. A., Roizen M. F., Bouchard A., Schiller N. B. Intraoperative detection of myocardial ischemia in high-risk patients: electrocardiography versus two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation. 1985 Nov;72(5):1015–1021. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.72.5.1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Webb R. K., Currie M., Morgan C. A., Williamson J. A., Mackay P., Russell W. J., Runciman W. B. The Australian Incident Monitoring Study: an analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993 Oct;21(5):520–528. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9302100507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Webb R. K., van der Walt J. H., Runciman W. B., Williamson J. A., Cockings J., Russell W. J., Helps S. The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Which monitor? An analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993 Oct;21(5):529–542. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9302100508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]