Abstract
Problem: Ten percent of infants born will require admission to a neonatal facility. Coordinated activity to monitor and improve the quality of care for this high risk, high cost group of infants is considered a high priority. At the time of initiation of this project no system for collection and analysis of neonatal data existed in Northern Ireland.
Design: In 1994 an ongoing prospective centralised data collection system was implemented to facilitate quality improvement and research in neonatal care. We aim to ascertain if there has been a demonstrable improvement in the quality of care provided since the initiation of this system.
Setting: All nine Northern Ireland neonatal intensive care units returned prospectively collected socioeconomic, obstetric and neonatal episode data.
Key measures for improvement: Achievement of the agreed quality indicators relating to transfer patterns, thermoregulation, antenatal steroid administration, and timing of administration of surfactant during the period 1 April 1999 to 31 March 2000 were compared with data for the period 1 April 1994 to 31 March 1996.
Strategies for change: Monitoring included audit and annual feedback of timely clear and relevant data where results were provided confidentially as standardised reports, together with anonymised comparisons with other similar sized units. Draft recommendations were made at regional level and units were asked to adopt finalised consensus guidelines at the local level and to implement changes to clinical practice.
Effects of change: The proportion of transfers taking place in utero increased from 26% to 42% and antenatal steroid administration from 68% to 82%. Normothermia on first admission improved from 66% to 71% for inborn infants. The proportion of infants receiving surfactant where the first dose was given within an hour of birth increased from 13% to 66%.
Lessons learnt: A multiprofessional regional care network can facilitate the development of agreed standards and a culture of regular evaluation leading to quality improvement.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (121.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Black N. High-quality clinical databases: breaking down barriers. Lancet. 1999 Apr 10;353(9160):1205–1206. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00108-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crowley P. Corticosteroids after preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1992 Jun;19(2):317–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Curley A. E., Halliday H. L. The present status of exogenous surfactant for the newborn. Early Hum Dev. 2001 Mar;61(2):67–83. doi: 10.1016/s0378-3782(00)00122-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horbar J. D. The Vermont Oxford Network: evidence-based quality improvement for neonatology. Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):350–359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horbar Jeffrey D., Carpenter Joseph H., Buzas Jeffrey, Soll Roger F., Suresh Gautham, Bracken Michael B., Leviton Laura C., Plsek Paul E., Sinclair John C. Collaborative quality improvement to promote evidence based surfactant for preterm infants: a cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2004 Oct 30;329(7473):1004–1004. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horbar Jeffrey D., Carpenter Joseph H., Buzas Jeffrey, Soll Roger F., Suresh Gautham, Bracken Michael B., Leviton Laura C., Plsek Paul E., Sinclair John C., Vermont Oxford Network Timing of initial surfactant treatment for infants 23 to 29 weeks' gestation: is routine practice evidence based? Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):1593–1602. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenkins J., Alderdice F., McCall E., Neonatal Intensive Care Outcomes Research and Evaluation Group Making information available for quality improvement and service planning in neonatal care. Ir Med J. 2003 Jun;96(6):171–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jobe A. H. Pulmonary surfactant therapy. N Engl J Med. 1993 Mar 25;328(12):861–868. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199303253281208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kollée L. A., Verloove-Vanhorick P. P., Verwey R. A., Brand R., Ruys J. H. Maternal and neonatal transport: results of a national collaborative survey of preterm and very low birth weight infants in The Netherlands. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Nov;72(5):729–732. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lubchenco L. O., Butterfield L. J., Delaney-Black V., Goldson E., Koops B. L., Lazotte D. C. Outcome of very-low-birth-weight infants: does antepartum versus neonatal referral have a better impact on mortality, morbidity, or long-term outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Mar;160(3):539–545. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(89)80022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parry G. J., Gould C. R., McCabe C. J., Tarnow-Mordi W. O. Annual league tables of mortality in neonatal intensive care units: longitudinal study. International Neonatal Network and the Scottish Neonatal Consultants and Nurses Collaborative Study Group. BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1931–1935. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7149.1931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vohra S., Frent G., Campbell V., Abbott M., Whyte R. Effect of polyethylene occlusive skin wrapping on heat loss in very low birth weight infants at delivery: a randomized trial. J Pediatr. 1999 May;134(5):547–551. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70238-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wallace E. M., Chapman J., Stenson B., Wright S. Antenatal corticosteroid prescribing: setting standards of care. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Nov;104(11):1262–1266. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10972.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.