Skip to main content
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2005 Aug;14(4):284–289. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.012542

Real time patient safety audits: improving safety every day

R Ursprung 1, J Gray 1, W Edwards 1, J Horbar 1, J Nickerson 1, P Plsek 1, P Shiono 1, G Suresh 1, D Goldmann 1
PMCID: PMC1744058  PMID: 16076794

Abstract

Background: Timely error detection including feedback to clinical staff is a prerequisite for focused improvement in patient safety. Real time auditing, the efficacy of which has been repeatedly demonstrated in industry, has not been used previously to evaluate patient safety. Methods successful at improving quality and safety in industry may provide avenues for improvement in patient safety.

Objective: Pilot study to determine the feasibility and utility of real time safety auditing during routine clinical work in an intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: A 36 item patient safety checklist was developed via a modified Delphi technique. The checklist focused on errors associated with delays in care, equipment failure, diagnostic studies, information transfer and non-compliance with hospital policy. Safety audits were performed using the checklist during and after morning work rounds thrice weekly during the 5 week study period from January to March 2003.

Results: A total of 338 errors were detected; 27 (75%) of the 36 items on the checklist detected ⩾1 error. Diverse error types were found including unlabeled medication at the bedside (n = 31), ID band missing or in an inappropriate location (n = 70), inappropriate pulse oximeter alarm setting (n = 22), and delay in communication/information transfer that led to a delay in appropriate care (n = 4).

Conclusions: Real time safety audits performed during routine work can detect a broad range of errors. Significant safety problems were detected promptly, leading to rapid changes in policy and practice. Staff acceptance was facilitated by fostering a blame free "culture of patient safety" involving clinical personnel in detection of remediable gaps in performance, and limiting the burden of data collection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (78.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker G. Ross, Norton Peter G., Flintoft Virginia, Blais Régis, Brown Adalsteinn, Cox Jafna, Etchells Ed, Ghali William A., Hébert Philip, Majumdar Sumit R. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ. 2004 May 25;170(11):1678–1686. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benneyan J. C., Lloyd R. C., Plsek P. E. Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12(6):458–464. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.6.458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brennan T. A., Leape L. L., Laird N. M., Hebert L., Localio A. R., Lawthers A. G., Newhouse J. P., Weiler P. C., Hiatt H. H. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 7;324(6):370–376. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102073240604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Classen D. C., Pestotnik S. L., Evans R. S., Burke J. P. Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients. JAMA. 1991 Nov 27;266(20):2847–2851. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cole Cynthia H., Wright Kenneth W., Tarnow-Mordi William, Phelps Dale L., Pulse Oximetry Saturation Trial for Prevention of Retinopathy of Prematurity Planning Study Group Resolving our uncertainty about oxygen therapy. Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 1):1415–1419. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.6.1415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cullen D. J., Bates D. W., Small S. D., Cooper J. B., Nemeskal A. R., Leape L. L. The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Oct;21(10):541–548. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30180-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grol Richard, Grimshaw Jeremy. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003 Oct 11;362(9391):1225–1230. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jha A. K., Kuperman G. J., Teich J. M., Leape L., Shea B., Rittenberg E., Burdick E., Seger D. L., Vander Vliet M., Bates D. W. Identifying adverse drug events: development of a computer-based monitor and comparison with chart review and stimulated voluntary report. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 May-Jun;5(3):305–314. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaushal R., Bates D. W., Landrigan C., McKenna K. J., Clapp M. D., Federico F., Goldmann D. A. Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. JAMA. 2001 Apr 25;285(16):2114–2120. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.16.2114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kendell J., Barthram C. Revised checklist for anaesthetic machines. Anaesthesia. 1998 Sep;53(9):887–890. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00462.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Leape L. L., Brennan T. A., Laird N., Lawthers A. G., Localio A. R., Barnes B. A., Hebert L., Newhouse J. P., Weiler P. C., Hiatt H. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 7;324(6):377–384. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102073240605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leape Lucian L., Berwick Donald M., Bates David W. What practices will most improve safety? Evidence-based medicine meets patient safety. JAMA. 2002 Jul 24;288(4):501–507. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.4.501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lehmann Christoph U., Conner Kim G., Cox Jeanne M. Preventing provider errors: online total parenteral nutrition calculator. Pediatrics. 2004 Apr;113(4):748–753. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.4.748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Miller Marlene R., Elixhauser Anne, Zhan Chunliu. Patient safety events during pediatric hospitalizations. Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 1):1358–1366. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.6.1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller Marlene R., Zhan Chunliu. Pediatric patient safety in hospitals: a national picture in 2000. Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):1741–1746. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Piotrowski Marcia M., Hinshaw Daniel B. The safety checklist program: creating a culture of safety in intensive care units. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Jun;28(6):306–315. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28030-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rozich J. D., Haraden C. R., Resar R. K. Adverse drug event trigger tool: a practical methodology for measuring medication related harm. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Jun;12(3):194–200. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.3.194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Suresh Gautham, Horbar Jeffrey D., Plsek Paul, Gray James, Edwards William H., Shiono Patricia H., Ursprung Robert, Nickerson Julianne, Lucey Jerold F., Goldmann Donald. Voluntary anonymous reporting of medical errors for neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):1609–1618. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thomas E. J., Studdert D. M., Newhouse J. P., Zbar B. I., Howard K. M., Williams E. J., Brennan T. A. Costs of medical injuries in Utah and Colorado. Inquiry. 1999 Fall;36(3):255–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vincent C., Neale G., Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):517–519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wilson R. M., Runciman W. B., Gibberd R. W., Harrison B. T., Newby L., Hamilton J. D. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust. 1995 Nov 6;163(9):458–471. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1995.tb124691.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES