Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2005 Oct;14(5):358–363. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014159

Multiplicity of medication safety terms, definitions and functional meanings: when is enough enough?

K Yu 1, R Nation 1, M Dooley 1
PMCID: PMC1744082  PMID: 16195570

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the terms and definitions used by organisations involved in medication safety and to examine differences in functional meaning using a novel scenario assignment method.

Methods: Medication safety related terms and definitions were sought from websites of organisations associated with medication safety. The functional meanings of terms and definitions were analysed and compared using a scenario assignment method where each definition found was assessed against four scenarios with a central theme.

Main outcome measures: Medication safety related terms and definitions currently in use, similarities and differences in their functional meanings, and practical implications of the use of these terms and definitions.

Results: Thirty three of 160 websites searched were found to have one or more definitions for medication safety related terms. Twenty five different terms with 119 definitions were found. The most frequently defined groups of terms were "adverse event" (8 different definitions), "error" (n = 9), "near miss" (n = 12), "adverse reaction" (n = 8), and "incident" (n = 4). Substantial diversity of functional meanings of definitions was demonstrated using the scenario-assignment method. Of the five groups of frequently defined terms, definitions within the "adverse event", "near miss", and "incident" groups resulted in three functional meanings each, while two functional meanings resulted for "error" and "adverse reaction".

Conclusion: The multiplicity of terms, definitions and, most importantly, functional meanings demonstrates the urgent need for agreement on standardisation of nomenclature describing medication related occurrences. This is an essential prerequisite to enable meaningful analysis of incidence data and development of medication safety improvement strategies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (80.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker G. Ross, Norton Peter G., Flintoft Virginia, Blais Régis, Brown Adalsteinn, Cox Jafna, Etchells Ed, Ghali William A., Hébert Philip, Majumdar Sumit R. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ. 2004 May 25;170(11):1678–1686. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates D. W., Boyle D. L., Vander Vliet M. B., Schneider J., Leape L. Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events. J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Apr;10(4):199–205. doi: 10.1007/BF02600255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates D. W. Medication errors. How common are they and what can be done to prevent them? Drug Saf. 1996 Nov;15(5):303–310. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199615050-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brennan T. A., Leape L. L., Laird N. M., Hebert L., Localio A. R., Lawthers A. G., Newhouse J. P., Weiler P. C., Hiatt H. H. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 7;324(6):370–376. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102073240604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Case R. L., Guzzetti P. J. A survey of adverse drug reaction reporting programs in select hospitals. Hosp Pharm. 1986 May;21(5):423-6, 431-4, 438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chaudhry Sarwat I., Olofinboba Kolawole A., Krumholz Harlan M. Detection of errors by attending physicians on a general medicine service. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):595–600. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20919.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dean B. Adverse drug events: what's the truth? Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Jun;12(3):165–166. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.3.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edwards I. R., Aronson J. K. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000 Oct 7;356(9237):1255–1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Flynn Elizabeth A., Barker Kenneth N., Pepper Ginette A., Bates David W., Mikeal Robert L. Comparison of methods for detecting medication errors in 36 hospitals and skilled-nursing facilities. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002 Mar 1;59(5):436–446. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/59.5.436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaplan H. S., Fastman B. Robin. Organization of event reporting data for sense making and system improvement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12 (Suppl 2):ii68–ii72. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaushal R., Bates D. W. Information technology and medication safety: what is the benefit? Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep;11(3):261–265. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.3.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Manasse H. R., Jr Medication use in an imperfect world: drug misadventuring as an issue of public policy, Part 1. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1989 May;46(5):929–944. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Morimoto T., Gandhi T. K., Seger A. C., Hsieh T. C., Bates D. W. Adverse drug events and medication errors: detection and classification methods. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Aug;13(4):306–314. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.010611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nebeker Jonathan R., Barach Paul, Samore Matthew H. Clarifying adverse drug events: a clinician's guide to terminology, documentation, and reporting. Ann Intern Med. 2004 May 18;140(10):795–801. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-10-200405180-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rubin G., George A., Chinn D. J., Richardson C. Errors in general practice: development of an error classification and pilot study of a method for detecting errors. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12(6):443–447. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.6.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schmidt Christopher E., Bottoni Thomas. Improving medication safety and patient care in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs. 2003 Feb;29(1):12–16. doi: 10.1067/men.2003.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Troutman William G., Doherty Kevin M. Comparison of voluntary adverse drug reaction reports and corresponding medical records. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003 Mar 15;60(6):572–575. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/60.6.572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Uribe Claudia L., Schweikhart Sharon B., Pathak Dev S., Dow Merrell, Marsh Gail B. Perceived barriers to medical-error reporting: an exploratory investigation. J Healthc Manag. 2002 Jul-Aug;47(4):263–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vincent C., Neale G., Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):517–519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Walshe K. Adverse events in health care: issues in measurement. Qual Health Care. 2000 Mar;9(1):47–52. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilson R. M., Harrison B. T., Gibberd R. W., Hamilton J. D. An analysis of the causes of adverse events from the Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust. 1999 May 3;170(9):411–415. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb127814.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilson R. M., Runciman W. B., Gibberd R. W., Harrison B. T., Newby L., Hamilton J. D. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust. 1995 Nov 6;163(9):458–471. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1995.tb124691.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES