Abstract
Objective: To develop a framework for understanding factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement.
Design: Qualitative interviews with senior health professionals and managers and a review of the literature.
Setting: A quality improvement collaborative in Minnesota, USA involving teams from eight medical groups, focusing on how to use patient survey data to improve patient centred care.
Participants: Eight team leaders (medical, clinical improvement or service quality directors) and six team members (clinical improvement coordinators and managers).
Results: Respondents reported three types of barriers before the collaborative: organisational, professional and data related. Organisational barriers included lack of supporting values for patient centred care, competing priorities, and lack of an effective quality improvement infrastructure. Professional barriers included clinicians and staff not being used to focusing on patient interaction as a quality issue, individuals not necessarily having been selected, trained or supported to provide patient centred care, and scepticism, defensiveness or resistance to change following feedback. Data related barriers included lack of expertise with survey data, lack of timely and specific results, uncertainty over the effective interventions or time frames for improvement, and consequent risk of perceived low cost effectiveness of data collection. Factors that appeared to have promoted data use included board led strategies to change culture and create quality improvement forums, leadership from senior physicians and managers, and the persistence of quality improvement staff over several years in demonstrating change in other areas.
Conclusion: Using patient survey data may require a more concerted effort than for other clinical data. Organisations may need to develop cultures that support patient centred care, quality improvement capacity, and to align professional receptiveness and leadership with technical expertise with the data.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (75.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cleary P. D., Edgman-Levitan S., Walker J. D., Gerteis M., Delbanco T. L. Using patient reports to improve medical care: a preliminary report from 10 hospitals. Qual Manag Health Care. 1993 Fall;2(1):31–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cleary P. D. The increasing importance of patient surveys. Now that sound methods exist, patient surveys can facilitate improvement. BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):720–721. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hargraves J. L., Wilson I. B., Zaslavsky A., James C., Walker J. D., Rogers G., Cleary P. D. Adjusting for patient characteristics when analyzing reports from patients about hospital care. Med Care. 2001 Jun;39(6):635–641. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200106000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hibbard Judith H., Stockard Jean, Tusler Martin. Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts? Health Aff (Millwood) 2003 Mar-Apr;22(2):84–94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaluzny A. D., McLaughlin C. P. Managing transitions: assuring the adoption and impact of TQM. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992 Nov;18(11):380–384. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30559-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Landon Bruce E., Zaslavsky Alan M., Bernard Shulamit L., Cioffi Matthew J., Cleary Paul D. Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care. JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1744–1752. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rogers G., Smith D. P. Reporting comparative results from hospital patient surveys. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Jun;11(3):251–259. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.3.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rogut L., Newman L. S., Cleary P. D. Variability in patient experiences at 15 New York City hospitals. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1996 Winter;73(2):314–334. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shortell S. M., O'Brien J. L., Carman J. M., Foster R. W., Hughes E. F., Boerstler H., O'Connor E. J. Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement/total quality management: concept versus implementation. Health Serv Res. 1995 Jun;30(2):377–401. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tasa K., Baker G. R., Murray M. Using patient feedback for quality improvement. Qual Manag Health Care. 1996 Winter;4(2):55–67. doi: 10.1097/00019514-199600420-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vingerhoets E., Wensing M., Grol R. Feedback of patients' evaluations of general practice care: a randomised trial. Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;10(4):224–228. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100224... [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wensing Michel, Elwyn Glyn. Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care. BMJ. 2003 Apr 19;326(7394):877–879. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7394.877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wensing Michel, Vingerhoets Eric, Grol Richard. Feedback based on patient evaluations: a tool for quality improvement? Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Oct;51(2):149–153. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00199-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Øvretveit J., Gustafson D. Evaluation of quality improvement programmes. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep;11(3):270–275. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.3.270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]