Abstract
Problem: An initial audit of the care provided to emergency asthma patients by the ambulance service was carried out in 1996. Some under-recognition and under-treatment of severe asthma was found as well as a lack of documentation of patient condition on scene. A re-audit was undertaken in 1999.
Design: A multidisciplinary advisory group was reconvened. The same method was adopted as for the first audit. Patients included were those administered nebulised salbutamol by crews in the catchment areas of four hospitals and those diagnosed with asthma at the Accident & Emergency (A&E) departments of those hospitals between January and March 1999.
Setting: London Ambulance Service.
Key measures for improvement: (1) Accuracy of diagnosis and appropriateness of treatment, and (2) adherence to protocol.
Strategies for change: Following the first audit, treatment protocols were widened and brought into line with the British Thoracic Society guidelines for care of acute asthma patients. The results were widely disseminated within the service and training was initiated for all operational staff.
Effects of change: The number of patients included in the re-audit more than doubled (audit 1: n = 252, audit 2: n = 532). The increase occurred exclusively in those administered nebulised salbutamol by ambulance crews but diagnosed with conditions other than asthma in A&E (audit 1: n = 15, audit 2: n = 161). The proportion of patients diagnosed with asthma in A&E who were administered nebulised salbutamol by their attending crew rose from 58% to 75%. However, 43 asthma patients were not treated; several of these were not recognised as suffering from asthma and others fell within the changed protocols for treatment. Adherence to protocol for administration of salbutamol remained high. Pre-hospital documentation of key observations did not improve.
Lessons learnt: Messages from the first audit seem to have been acted upon selectively. Implementing change is complex, and re-audit is necessary to understand the effects of the changes made.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (62.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barriot P., Riou B. Prevention of fatal asthma. Chest. 1987 Sep;92(3):460–466. doi: 10.1378/chest.92.3.460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baumann U. A., Haerdi E., Keller R. Relations between clinical signs and lung function in bronchial asthma: how is acute bronchial obstruction reflected in dyspnoea and wheezing? Respiration. 1986;50(4):294–300. doi: 10.1159/000194941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berger A. Why doesn't audit work? BMJ. 1998 Mar 21;316(7135):875–876. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7135.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delbridge Theodore, Domeier Robert, Key Craig B. Prehospital asthma management. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2003 Jan-Mar;7(1):42–47. doi: 10.1080/10903120390937076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fergusson R. J., Stewart C. M., Wathen C. G., Moffat R., Crompton G. K. Effectiveness of nebulised salbutamol administered in ambulances to patients with severe acute asthma. Thorax. 1995 Jan;50(1):81–82. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gnanalingham J., Gnanalingham M. G., Gnanalingham K. K. An audit of audits: are we completing the cycle? J R Soc Med. 2001 Jun;94(6):288–289. doi: 10.1177/014107680109400609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harvey S., Forbes L., Jarvis D., Price J., Burney P. Accident and emergency departments are still failing to assess asthma severity. Emerg Med J. 2003 Jul;20(4):329–331. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.4.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnston G., Crombie I. K., Davies H. T., Alder E. M., Millard A. Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit. Qual Health Care. 2000 Mar;9(1):23–36. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowbury E. J., Babb J. R., Bridges K., Jackson D. M. Topical chemoprophylaxis with silver sulphadiazine and silver nitrate chlorhexidine creams: emergence of sulphonamide-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Br Med J. 1976 Feb 28;1(6008):493–496. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6008.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McFadden E. R., Jr, Warren E. L. Observations on asthma mortality. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 15;127(2):142–147. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-2-199707150-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Model D. Preventable factors and death certification in death due to asthma. Respir Med. 1995 Jan;89(1):21–25. doi: 10.1016/0954-6111(95)90066-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ong C. C., Chorbachi R. The difficulties encountered in completing an audit cycle in a district general hospital. Int J Clin Pract. 1998 Jul-Aug;52(5):298–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ormerod L. P., Stableforth D. E. Asthma mortality in Birmingham 1975-7: 53 deaths. Br Med J. 1980 Mar 8;280(6215):687–690. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6215.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinnock H., Johnson A., Young P., Martin N. Are doctors still failing to assess and treat asthma attacks? An audit of the management of acute attacks in a health district. Respir Med. 1999 Jun;93(6):397–401. doi: 10.1053/rmed.1999.0575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shim C. S., Williams M. H., Jr Evaluation of the severity of asthma: patients versus physicians. Am J Med. 1980 Jan;68(1):11–13. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(80)90155-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soriano J. B., Kiri V. A., Maier W. C., Strachan D. Increasing prevalence of asthma in UK primary care during the 1990s. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 May;7(5):415–421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wobig E. K., Rosen P. Death from asthma: rare but real. J Emerg Med. 1996 Mar-Apr;14(2):233–240. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(95)02108-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]