Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2005 Dec;14(6):438–442. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014233

Hospital quality improvement in context: a multilevel analysis of staff job evaluations

U Krogstad 1, D Hofoss 1, M Veenstra 1, P Gulbrandsen 1, P Hjortdahl 1
PMCID: PMC1744103  PMID: 16326791

Abstract

Objective: To investigate how much of the variance in data on nurse evaluation of different aspects of hospital work can be attributed to individual, ward, department and hospital levels, and to discuss the implication of the findings on quality improvement strategies.

Design and method: National survey data of work experiences were collected from hospital nurses working at 124 hospital wards in 36 departments in 15 hospitals across Norway during the autumn of 1998. The multilevel structure of the variation of nine indices of job satisfaction was explored by fitting four-level random intercept models (nurse, ward, department and hospital).

Results: A total of 2606 nurses (66%) responded. The indices showed varying clustering to organizational units. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) varied from 0.05 to 0.38, representing considerable higher level variation. The ward level was the dominating level for the clustering of nurses' job aspect evaluations.

Conclusion: Multilevel modelling of staff work experiences may identify which improvement goals can be addressed at which organizational level. Improvement efforts should be directed specifically towards each aspect of work and at its most relevant organizational level. Strategies aimed at the micro-organizational level (ward management) rather than the individual level or the macro level (hospital top management) might prove worthwhile.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (68.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams A., Bond S., Hale C. A. Nursing organizational practice and its relationship with other features of ward organization and job satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 1998 Jun;27(6):1212–1222. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00657.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams A., Bond S. Hospital nurses' job satisfaction, individual and organizational characteristics. J Adv Nurs. 2000 Sep;32(3):536–543. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01513.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams Ann, Bond Senga. Focus on staff stability: its role in enhancing ward nursing practice. J Nurs Manag. 2003 Sep;11(5):285–286. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2834.2003.00362.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aiken L. H., Clarke S. P., Sloane D. M., Sochalski J. Cause for concern: nurses' reports of hospital care in five countries. LDI Issue Brief. 2001 May;6(8):1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aiken L. H., Patrician P. A. Measuring organizational traits of hospitals: the Revised Nursing Work Index. Nurs Res. 2000 May-Jun;49(3):146–153. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200005000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Aiken L. H. The hospital nursing shortage. A paradox of increasing supply and increasing vacancy rates. West J Med. 1989 Jul;151(1):87–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Aiken Linda H., Clarke Sean P., Sloane Douglas M., International Hospital Outcomes Research Consortium Hospital staffing, organization, and quality of care: cross-national findings. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 Feb;14(1):5–13. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Allred C. A., Arford P. H., Michel Y. Coordination as a critical element of managed care. J Nurs Adm. 1995 Dec;25(12):21–28. doi: 10.1097/00005110-199512000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cho Sung-Hyun. Using multilevel analysis in patient and organizational outcomes research. Nurs Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;52(1):61–65. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200301000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Coulter A., Cleary P. D. Patients' experiences with hospital care in five countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001 May-Jun;20(3):244–252. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Davies H. T., Marshall M. N. Public disclosure of performance data: does the public get what the public wants? Lancet. 1999 May 15;353(9165):1639–1640. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)90047-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Davies H. T., Nutley S. M., Mannion R. Organisational culture and quality of health care. Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;9(2):111–119. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.2.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Elovainio Marko, Kivimäki Mika, Steen Nick, Vahtera Jussi. Job decision latitude, organizational justice and health: multilevel covariance structure analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2004 May;58(9):1659–1669. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00366-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Epstein A. M. The outcomes movement--will it get us where we want to go? N Engl J Med. 1990 Jul 26;323(4):266–270. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199007263230410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Krogstad Unni, Hofoss Dag, Hjortdahl Per. Doctor and nurse perception of inter-professional co-operation in hospitals. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Dec;16(6):491–497. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Krogstad Unni, Veenstra Marijke, Sjetne Ingeborg Strømseng, Østhus Randi, Røttingen John-Arne. Sykehusorganisasjoner sett med personalets øyne. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2002 Aug 20;122(19):1890–1894. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Leatherman S., Donaldson L. J., Eisenberg J. M. International collaboration: harnessing differences to meet common needs in improving quality of care. Qual Health Care. 2000 Sep;9(3):143–144. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.3.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MacKay R. C., Matsuno K., Mulligan J. Communication problems between doctors and nurses. Qual Assur Health Care. 1991;3(1):11–19. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/3.1.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McManus I. C., Winder B., Paice Elizabeth. How consultants, hospitals, trusts and deaneries affect pre-registration house officer posts: a multilevel model. Med Educ. 2002 Jan;36(1):35–44. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01123.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Scholten G. R., van der Grinten T. E. Between physician and manager: new co-operation models in Dutch hospitals. J Manag Med. 1998;12(1):33-43, 3. doi: 10.1108/02689239810225238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shortell S. M., Gillies R. R., Anderson D. A., Mitchell J. B., Morgan K. L. Creating organized delivery systems: the barriers and facilitators. Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1993 Winter;38(4):447–466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sitzia J., Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Dec;45(12):1829–1843. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00128-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Van Yperen N. W., Snijders T. A. A multilevel analysis of the demands--control model: is stress at work determined by factors at the group level or the individual level? J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Jan;5(1):182–190. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.5.1.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Veenstra Marijke, Hofoss Dag. Patient experiences with information in a hospital setting: a multilevel approach. Med Care. 2003 Apr;41(4):490–499. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000053229.70474.A3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES