Skip to main content
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2005 Dec;14(6):433–437. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014423

The OutPatient Experiences Questionnaire (OPEQ): data quality, reliability, and validity in patients attending 52 Norwegian hospitals

A Garratt 1, O Bjaertnes 1, U Krogstad 1, P Gulbrandsen 1
PMCID: PMC1744107  PMID: 16326790

Abstract

Objective: To describe the development and evaluation of the OutPatient Experiences Questionnaire (OPEQ) for somatic outpatients.

Design: Literature review, patient interviews, pretesting of questionnaire items, and a cross sectional survey.

Setting: Postal survey of adult outpatient clinics at 52 hospitals in all five regions of Norway during 2003 and 2004.

Subjects: 35 719 patients who had attended an outpatient clinic within the previous 3 weeks.

Results: 19 266 patients (53.9%) responded to the questionnaire. Low levels of missing data suggest that the questionnaire is acceptable to patients. Factor analysis of items applicable to all patients produced three factors: clinic access (two items), communication (six items), and organisation (four items). The remaining items contributed to the hypothesised scales of hospital standards (three items), information (six items), and pre-visit communication (three items). With the exception of the pre-visit communication scale, the levels of Cronbach's alpha were >0.7. With the exception of the hospital standards scale, all produced test-retest correlations that exceeded 0.7. Most of the results of validity testing were as hypothesised. Correlations between the OPEQ scores ranged from 0.30 (clinic access and hospital standards) to 0.73 (communication and information). As hypothesised, scores were significantly related to patient responses to questions about overall satisfaction, general health and age.

Conclusions: The OPEQ is a self-administered questionnaire that includes the most important aspects of patient experience from an outpatient perspective. It has good evidence for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (71.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avis M., Bond M., Arthur A. Satisfying solutions? A review of some unresolved issues in the measurement of patient satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 1995 Aug;22(2):316–322. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22020316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fitzpatrick R. Capturing what matters to patients when they evaluate their hospital care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):306–306. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Garratt Andrew, Bjertnaes Øyvind Andresen, Krogstad Unni, Gulbrandsen Pål. Pasienterfaringsinstrumentet PasOpp i somatiske poliklinikker. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2005 Feb 17;125(4):421–424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Guldvog B., Hofoss D., Pettersen K. I., Ebbesen J., Rønning O. M. PS-RESKVA--pasienttilfredshet i sykehus. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1998 Jan 30;118(3):386–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hall J. A., Dornan M. C. What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(9):935–939. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90284-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jenkinson C., Coulter A., Bruster S., Richards N., Chandola T. Patients' experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):335–339. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jenkinson Crispin, Coulter Angela, Gyll Robert, Lindström Pål, Avner Linda, Höglund Elisabeth. Measuring the experiences of health care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD): development of the Picker MSD questionnaire. Scand J Caring Sci. 2002 Sep;16(3):329–333. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00088.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pettersen Kjell I., Veenstra Marijke, Guldvog Bjørn, Kolstad Arne. The Patient Experiences Questionnaire: development, validity and reliability. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Dec;16(6):453–463. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sitzia J. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Aug;11(4):319–328. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.4.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sitzia J., Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Dec;45(12):1829–1843. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00128-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES