Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Sexually Transmitted Infections logoLink to Sexually Transmitted Infections
. 2000 Aug;76(4):268–272. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.4.268

Geomapping of chlamydia and gonorrhoea in Birmingham

M Shahmanesh 1, S Gayed 1, M Ashcroft 1, R Smith 1, R Roopnarainsingh 1, J Dunn 1, J Ross 1
PMCID: PMC1744196  PMID: 11026881

Abstract

Objective: To investigate if the core population hypothesis is applicable to patients with genital chlamydia infections.

Design: Retrospective cross sectional study.

Setting: Two genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics in the city of Birmingham and eight adjacent clinics.

Subjects: All patients with chlamydia (n = 665) or gonorrhoea (n = 584) attending between 1 October 1995 and 30 September 1996 with a postcode within the Birmingham health district. Controls were 727 patients seen in the same period with no infection.

Methods: Postcodes were used to calculate population prevalence rates per 100 000 aged 15–65 in the 39 wards of the city and to estimate the socioeconomic status using the Super Profile (SP). Ethnic specific rates were also calculated. Data were obtained on gonorrhoea and chlamydia isolation from all the major laboratories of the city over the same time period.

Results: GUM clinic attenders accounted for 67.6% and 82.5% of all chlamydia and gonorrhoea isolates reported by the laboratories and that were available for our epidemiological analysis. Both infections were more common in men and in black ethnic groups. However, patients with gonorrhoea only infection were more likely to be of black ethnicity than those with chlamydia only infection (p = 0.0001) and to have different SP distribution (p = 0.0001). On logistic regression age <20 years, male sex, black ethnicity, and living in neighbourhoods with SP J ("have nots") were predictive of both infections compared with controls. Overall chlamydia and gonorrhoea prevalence rates were 129 and 98.4 per 105 respectively. Corresponding rates for whites was 64.7 and 37.2 and for black ethnic groups 1105 and 1183 per 105 of each ethnic group. Eight adjacent wards accounted for 41% of the chlamydia and 66.5% of the gonorrhoea.

Conclusion: In a large urban setting patients attending GUM clinics with chlamydia belong to core population groups with similar, but not identical, sociodemographic characteristics to patients with gonorrhoea infection.

Key Words: gonorrhoea; Chlamydia trachomatis; geomapping; ethnicity

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (279.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barlow D., Daker-White G., Band B. Assortative sexual mixing in a heterosexual clinic population--a limiting factor in HIV spread? AIDS. 1997 Jul;11(8):1039–1044. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199708000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Becker K. M., Glass G. E., Brathwaite W., Zenilman J. M. Geographic epidemiology of gonorrhea in Baltimore, Maryland, using a geographic information system. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Apr 1;147(7):709–716. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blythe M. J., Katz B. P., Orr D. P., Caine V. A., Jones R. B. Historical and clinical factors associated with Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in female adolescents. J Pediatr. 1988 Jun;112(6):1000–1004. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(88)80236-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burstein G. R., Gaydos C. A., Diener-West M., Howell M. R., Zenilman J. M., Quinn T. C. Incident Chlamydia trachomatis infections among inner-city adolescent females. JAMA. 1998 Aug 12;280(6):521–526. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.6.521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ellen J. M., Aral S. O., Madger L. S. Do differences in sexual behaviors account for the racial/ethnic differences in adolescents' self-reported history of a sexually transmitted disease? Sex Transm Dis. 1998 Mar;25(3):125–129. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199803000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ellen J. M., Hessol N. A., Kohn R. P., Bolan G. A. An investigation of geographic clustering of repeat cases of gonorrhea and chlamydial infection in San Francisco, 1989-1993: evidence for core groups. J Infect Dis. 1997 Jun;175(6):1519–1522. doi: 10.1086/516491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ellen J. M., Kohn R. P., Bolan G. A., Shiboski S., Krieger N. Socioeconomic differences in sexually transmitted disease rates among black and white adolescents, San Francisco, 1990 to 1992. Am J Public Health. 1995 Nov;85(11):1546–1548. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.11.1546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Evans B. A., Bond R. A., MacRae K. D. Racial origin, sexual behaviour, and genital infection among heterosexual men attending a genitourinary medicine clinic in London (1993-4). Sex Transm Infect. 1998 Feb;74(1):40–44. doi: 10.1136/sti.74.1.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Evans B. A., Tasker T., MacRae K. D. Risk profiles for genital infection in women. Genitourin Med. 1993 Aug;69(4):257–261. doi: 10.1136/sti.69.4.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fisher M., Swenson P. D., Risucci D., Kaplan M. H. Chlamydia trachomatis in suburban adolescents. J Pediatr. 1987 Oct;111(4):617–620. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80134-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ford K., Norris A. Sexual networks of African-American and Hispanic youth. Sex Transm Dis. 1997 Jul;24(6):327–333. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199707000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fox K. K., Whittington W. L., Levine W. C., Moran J. S., Zaidi A. A., Nakashima A. K. Gonorrhea in the United States, 1981-1996. Demographic and geographic trends. Sex Transm Dis. 1998 Aug;25(7):386–393. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199808000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ghani A. C., Swinton J., Garnett G. P. The role of sexual partnership networks in the epidemiology of gonorrhea. Sex Transm Dis. 1997 Jan;24(1):45–56. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199701000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Handsfield H. H., Jasman L. L., Roberts P. L., Hanson V. W., Kothenbeutel R. L., Stamm W. E. Criteria for selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending family planning clinics. JAMA. 1986 Apr 4;255(13):1730–1734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lacey C. J., Merrick D. W., Bensley D. C., Fairley I. Analysis of the sociodemography of gonorrhoea in Leeds, 1989-93. BMJ. 1997 Jun 14;314(7096):1715–1718. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7096.1715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Low N., Daker-White G., Barlow D., Pozniak A. L. Gonorrhoea in inner London: results of a cross sectional study. BMJ. 1997 Jun 14;314(7096):1719–1723. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7096.1719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Marrazzo J. M., White C. L., Krekeler B., Celum C. L., Lafferty W. E., Stamm W. E., Handsfield H. H. Community-based urine screening for Chlamydia trachomatis with a ligase chain reaction assay. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Nov 1;127(9):796–803. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-9-199711010-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mosure D. J., Berman S., Fine D., DeLisle S., Cates W., Jr, Boring J. R., 3rd Genital Chlamydia infections in sexually active female adolescents: do we really need to screen everyone? J Adolesc Health. 1997 Jan;20(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(96)00157-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Potterat J. J., Rothenberg R. B., Woodhouse D. E., Muth J. B., Pratts C. I., Fogle J. S., 2nd Gonorrhea as a social disease. Sex Transm Dis. 1985 Jan-Mar;12(1):25–32. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198501000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rice R. J., Roberts P. L., Handsfield H. H., Holmes K. K. Sociodemographic distribution of gonorrhea incidence: implications for prevention and behavioral research. Am J Public Health. 1991 Oct;81(10):1252–1258. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.10.1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stary A. Chlamydia screening: which sample for which technique? Genitourin Med. 1997 Apr;73(2):99–102. doi: 10.1136/sti.73.2.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stergachis A., Scholes D., Heidrich F. E., Sherer D. M., Holmes K. K., Stamm W. E. Selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a primary care population of women. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Aug 1;138(3):143–153. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wasserheit J. N., Aral S. O. The dynamic topology of sexually transmitted disease epidemics: implications for prevention strategies. J Infect Dis. 1996 Oct;174 (Suppl 2):S201–S213. doi: 10.1093/infdis/174.supplement_2.s201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Winter A. J., Sriskandabalan P., Wade A. A., Cummins C., Barker P. Sociodemography of genital Chlamydia trachomatis in Coventry, UK, 1992-6. Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Apr;76(2):103–109. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.2.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Winter L., Goldy A. S., Baer C. Prevalence and epidemiologic correlates of Chlamydia trachomatis in rural and urban populations. Sex Transm Dis. 1990 Jan-Mar;17(1):30–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zenilman J. M., Ellish N., Fresia A., Glass G. The geography of sexual partnerships in Baltimore: applications of core theory dynamics using a geographic information system. Sex Transm Dis. 1999 Feb;26(2):75–81. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199902000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES