Abstract
Objectives: To assess the care process and clinical outcomes for two different models of GUM clinic for women: one led by specialist nurses and the other by senior house officers (SHOs)
Method: An open randomised controlled trial was carried out in a central London genitourinary medicine (GUM) women's clinic. Of 1172 women telephoning for an appointment, 880 were randomised to provide 169 eligible patients in the specialist nurse arm and 178 in the SHO arm. Of the eligible patients a total of 224 attended their appointment. The clinical records of the randomised women were audited for adequacy of care according to local guidelines. 30 key variables were objectively assessed and recorded on a standard audit form. An overall unitary index score (%) was calculated for each patient. The main variables associated with the outcome of specialist nurse and SHO decision making (diagnostic test request, preliminary diagnosis, and treatment provided) were then analysed independently.
Results: The median documentation audit scores for specialist nurses (n=103) and SHOs (n=121) were 92% and 85% respectively (p<0.0001). The specialist nurses' documentation was significantly (p<0.05) more complete than the SHOs' for five variables: details of menstrual cycle, physical examination, medication instructions given to patients, health promotion discussion, and provision of condoms. Specialist nurses performed equally to the SHOs with regard to requesting the correct diagnostic tests, providing the correct preliminary diagnosis, and providing the correct treatment.
Conclusions: A model of care using trained GUM nurses working within agreed protocols can provide comprehensive patient care for female patients that is equal to care provided by SHOs. Our results raise important issues regarding advanced GUM nursing education and training, protocol development, and accountability.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (134.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Allen D. Putting the experts in charge. Nurs Stand. 1998 Jan 14;12(17):22–23. doi: 10.7748/ns.12.17.22.s38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allen I. Challenges to the health services: the professions. BMJ. 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1533–1535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell N. C., Thain J., Deans H. G., Ritchie L. D., Rawles J. M., Squair J. L. Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: randomised trial of effect on health. BMJ. 1998 May 9;316(7142):1434–1437. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7142.1434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill J., Bird H. A., Harmer R., Wright V., Lawton C. An evaluation of the effectiveness, safety and acceptability of a nurse practitioner in a rheumatology outpatient clinic. Br J Rheumatol. 1994 Mar;33(3):283–288. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/33.3.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kinnersley P., Anderson E., Parry K., Clement J., Archard L., Turton P., Stainthorpe A., Fraser A., Butler C. C., Rogers C. Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting "same day" consultations in primary care. BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1043–1048. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lamagni T. L., Hughes G., Rogers P. A., Paine T., Catchpole M. New cases seen at genitourinary medicine clinics: England 1998. Commun Dis Rep CDR Suppl. 1999 Dec;9(6):S1–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rogers J. S., Adler M. W. Role and training of nurses working in departments of genitourinary medicine in England and Wales. 1. Role. Genitourin Med. 1987 Apr;63(2):122–126. doi: 10.1136/sti.63.2.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salvage J., Smith R. Doctors and nurses: doing it differently. BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1019–1020. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shum C., Humphreys A., Wheeler D., Cochrane M. A., Skoda S., Clement S. Nurse management of patients with minor illnesses in general practice: multicentre, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1038–1043. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutton A., Kingsland T., Ross S., Burke M., Gray T., Jenkins J. Nursing in genitourinary medicine: 10 years on from the Monks Report. The membership of GUNA. Genito-Urinary Nurses Association. Int J STD AIDS. 1999 Aug;10(8):539–542. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Venning P., Durie A., Roland M., Roberts C., Leese B. Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care. BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1048–1053. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]