Skip to main content
Sexually Transmitted Infections logoLink to Sexually Transmitted Infections
. 2002 Apr;78(2):115–119. doi: 10.1136/sti.78.2.115

Chlamydia trachomatis infections in eastern Europe: legal aspects, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment

M Domeika 1, A Hallen 1, L Karabanov 1, K Chudomirova 1, F Gruber 1, V Unzeitig 1, A Poder 1, J Deak 1, I Jakobsone 1, G Lapinskaite 1, Z Dajek 1, V Akovbian 1, M Gomberg 1, A Khryanin 1, A Savitcheva 1, I Takac 1, L Glazkova 1, N Vinograd 1, M Nedeljkovic 1
PMCID: PMC1744451  PMID: 12081171

Abstract

Objectives: Knowledge concerning genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in eastern Europe is scarce. Data on the legal aspects, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of the infection have never been collected, summarised, and presented to the international scientific community. The aim of this study was to present the current situation on the main aspects of chlamydial infections in the countries of eastern Europe.

Methods: Written questionnaires concerning legal aspects, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of the infection were distributed among national STI operating administrators as well as researchers who had presented papers at earlier meetings of European chlamydia or STI societies.

Results: Most of the countries have not legalised reporting of chlamydial infections and in those who have done so, the quality of the reporting system is poor. Contact tracing is mostly done on a voluntary basis. Reported chlamydia incidence varies from 21 to 276 per 100 000 inhabitants. The most commonly used diagnostic test remains the direct immunofluorescence test; however, some tendencies towards nucleic acid amplification are in evidence. Diagnostic services are paid for by the patient himself, while treatment in many countries is partially or completely covered by public insurance.

Conclusions: This is the first report summarising data concerning the situation on C trachomatis infections in eastern Europe. The reporting system and diagnosis of C trachomatis infections remain suboptimal, which allows neither control of the epidemiological situation nor optimal treatment of the patients. The most urgent work currently necessary is the education of professionals and the general population.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (152.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gomberg M. A., Akovbian V. A. Resurgence of sexually transmitted diseases in Russia and eastern Europe. Dermatol Clin. 1998 Oct;16(4):659-62, ix-x. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(05)70029-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Linglöf T. Rapid increase of syphilis and gonorrhea in parts of the former USSR. Sex Transm Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(3):160–161. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199505000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rubins A., Rubins S., Jakabsone I. Syphilis and gonorrhoea in the Baltic countries. Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Jun;76(3):214–214. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.3.214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tichonova L., Borisenko K., Ward H., Meheus A., Gromyko A., Renton A. Epidemics of syphilis in the Russian Federation: trends, origins, and priorities for control. Lancet. 1997 Jul 19;350(9072):210–213. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01382-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES