Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether a planned change from a walk-in service to a system in which 35% of appointments were prebooked and 65% obtained on the day, preserved access to the service for patients with, or at risk of, STIs. To describe patients' attitudes and behaviours in relation to accessing the clinic, and relate these to disease status and other epidemiological factors. To evaluate the effect of the change on clinical outcomes. To develop a tool for evaluating access to services.
Method: A natural experiment was studied, in which a cohort of patients attending just before the change in appointments policy (phase 1) was compared with a cohort following the change (phase 2). A questionnaire was administered to all new patients, and linked to disaggregated epidemiological and demographic data and case notes.
Results: The age, ethnic, symptom status, and disease mix of the clinic did not change significantly, and more patients were seen in phase 2. Time from telephoning to being seen did not change. Under 25s and Afro-Caribbeans used prebooked appointments less than others. Partner notification improved and HIV testing rates increased, while staff preferred the new system.
Conclusion: This specific appointment system in a GUM clinic preserved access for high risk groups. However, this may not generalise to systems with a higher proportion of prebooked appointments.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (146.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cassell J., Young A. Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research. J Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;28(5):313–317. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.5.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Catchpole M. Sexually transmitted infections: control strategies. BMJ. 2001 May 12;322(7295):1135–1136. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7295.1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Djuretic T., Catchpole M., Bingham J. S., Robinson A., Hughes G., Kinghorn G. Genitourinary medicine services in the United Kingdom are failing to meet current demand. Int J STD AIDS. 2001 Sep;12(9):571–572. doi: 10.1258/0956462011923732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foley E., Patel R., Green N., Rowen D. Access to genitourinary medicine clinics in the United Kingdom. Sex Transm Infect. 2001 Feb;77(1):12–14. doi: 10.1136/sti.77.1.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grun L., Tassano-Smith J., Carder C., Johnson A. M., Robinson A., Murray E., Stephenson J., Haines A., Copas A., Ridgway G. Comparison of two methods of screening for genital chlamydial infection in women attending in general practice: cross sectional survey. BMJ. 1997 Jul 26;315(7102):226–230. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7102.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harindra V., Tobin J. M., Tucker L. J. Triage clinics: a way forward in genitourinary medicine. Int J STD AIDS. 2001 May;12(5):295–298. doi: 10.1258/0956462011923101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hook E. W., 3rd, Richey C. M., Leone P., Bolan G., Spalding C., Henry K., Clarke P., Smith M., Celum C. L. Delayed presentation to clinics for sexually transmitted diseases by symptomatic patients. A potential contributor to continuing STD morbidity. Sex Transm Dis. 1997 Sep;24(8):443–448. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199709000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kinghorn G. R. Patient access to GUM clinics. Sex Transm Infect. 2001 Feb;77(1):1–2. doi: 10.1136/sti.77.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Low N., Sterne J. A., Barlow D. Inequalities in rates of gonorrhoea and chlamydia between black ethnic groups in south east London: cross sectional study. Sex Transm Infect. 2001 Feb;77(1):15–20. doi: 10.1136/sti.77.1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]